#AstraZenaca#vaccine and Guillain-Barre Syndrome: are the UK authorities missing a clear safety signal?
GBS can be caused by certain infections and there is also a small associated risk with some vaccinations, notably influenza.
What about the Covid vaccines?
In the UK the two main vaccines are AZ and Pfizer
The table below compares the incidence of GBS per million doses of each vaccine
GBS is reported 5 times as often after AZ than Pfizer
But could there be differences in the people who got AZ / Pfizer that could explain this?
GBS is most common in over 50s and older age groups are likely over-represented in the AZ group because of the JCVI guidance to prefer mRNA for under 40s
Can we quantify this? Unfortunately the UK is not transparent as to the age breakdown between the 2 vaccines
However...
In its weekly TTS reporting, MHRA provides just enough information to infer that around 14 million AZ doses were given to under 50s
Across the UK, around 29m doses of any vaccine have been given to under 50s
31% of AZ doses were given to under 50s (69% to over 50s)
52% of Pfizer doses were given to under 50s (48% to over 50s)
So we could expect the higher % of over 50s to explain some of the difference in GBS incidence, but not all
Since the proportion of over 50s in the AZ group is 44% (69/48) higher than the Pfizer group, we might expect the incidence of GBS to be 44% higher in AZ than Pfizer because of the age difference
But it's over 400% higher
Meanwhile, the EMA started looking into GBS+AZ in May
In a June update the EMA announced that it was still investigating a potential signal and had found 156 cases after 40m AZ doses
That's just under 4 cases per million AZ doses
In the UK we have 7 cases per million AZ doses, yet no acknowledgement of this by @MHRAgovuk
The EMA also requested healthcare professionals to report cases of GBS post vaccination
Has @MHRAgovuk done the same? I can't find any evidence of a similar communication in the UK
After being the last regulator in Europe to spot VITT, is MHRA asleep at the wheel yet again?
Anecdotal cases of GBS post AZ are finally being reported in the media
This 54 y/o man experienced GBS after AZ and his MP wrote to Nadhim Zahawi, the UK vaccine minister
The response from Zahawi?
Seek mental health advice or contact the Samaritans!
DVT as a feature of #VITT: unusual in the UK / Europe yet common in Australia - could cases have been missed?
NB this is a loose theory, not an assertion
Here are some observations
On 20 May ATAGI reported a breakdown of types of clot seen in 🇦🇺 VITT cases
Of 21 confirmed + 3 probable cases, DVT was present in 12 (50%)
Even excl. probables + assuming all 3 included DVT, that would mean DVT present in minimum 9 / 21 = 43% VITT cases tga.gov.au/periodic/covid…
In Europe only 3 / 45 (7%) cases across 4 published papers (Schultz, Greinacher, Scully, Tiede) + 1 unpublished study (Scavone) include DVT according to a paper by M Cattaneo
This is strikingly different from the Australian data - what could explain it?
As an add-on to my thread explaining why regulators are unlikely to detect an increase in the risk of blood clots generally due to the #AstraZenecaVaccine (annotated 100% with #JurassicPark GIFs!) I present:
Hang on a minute, *does* AZ increase overall clot risk??
[thread]
The previous thread outlined how the analysis done by #EMA and #MHRA to detect an increase in the incidence of #BloodClots after AZ was crap because they forgot they were dealing with vaccine reporting (reports filed *if* someone suspects vax link) and…
*not* a clinical trial where participants are monitored and all health issues are reported
So they ended up comparing a huge baseline rate to the tiny number of clots that actually got reported to them and now they think the AZ vaccine reduces the risk of blood clots by 98%
If AstraZeneca increased the risk of common blood clots, as well as the rare and dangerous ones, would we even know about it?
[thread]
The focus of the blood clot risk of the AstraZeneca vaccine has been on the clots in unusual (and dangerous) sites such as the brain and abdomen that have been found alongside low platelets (thrombocytopenia)
Thanks to Norway and Denmark, this new syndrome was rapidly identified and reported as a risk, even if certain parties were initially in denial (looking at you MHRA)
Oxford’s Dodgy Dossier (Part 1): How Oxford University researchers twisted facts and manipulated statistics to make the Oxford vaccine look better and mRNA vaccines look worse
Last week a group of Oxford scientists released a pre-print comparing the incidence of dangerous (1/x)
blood clots in the two weeks following 1) a Covid diagnosis 2) vaccination with the Oxford vaccine 3) vaccination with an mRNA vaccine
While the main headline grabber of the report was the claim that Covid infection carries a higher risk of blood (2/x)
clots than the Oxford vaccine, the paper also claimed the incidence of unusual, dangerous blood clots after mRNA vaccines was much, much higher than after the Oxford vaccine
To be specific, the paper claimed that 4 out of every million people vaccinated with an mRNA (3/x)