#swfc @KieranMaguire covers all the necessary ground in the article below from @AlexMiller91, and has even supplied headline numbers (), but I thought I'd jump in with some projections for 20-21 and 21-22 to sort of tie a knot on things in the thread below.
I'm currently deep into writing a season review/preview thing that also has a lot of financial data and analysis - obviously needs tinkering now the accounts are out 😜

Enough pre-amble, here are some charts:

Revenue likely to be halved in 20-21 and decrease further in 21-22:
If we add on transfer fees received (and what can be assumed to be compensation fee for Steve Bruce), as well as likely Covid 19 furlough compensation, we're up to £13.6m of income in 20-21, which is still half 19-20's:
So revenue and income has dropped off, then.

But so have expenses, from £45m in 19-20 to £30m in 20-21 and, as things stand, £15m in 21-22.

"As things stand" means only the wages of the current 12 first teamers under contract is included, so it'll be more than £15m, though!
Relegation has freed us from our "Profitability & Sustainability"/FFP overlords and the stadium sale in 18-19 means we'll have no issues for 2017-20.

The new name of the game is "Salary Control Management Protocol" (SCMP):

3 out of every 4 pounds revenue can be spent on wages.
With a projected £8.4m of revenue our limit for wages is £6.3m.

The 12 senior players under contract currently (July 7th) cost £5.7m in wages, so on the surface that's just £600k below the allowed limit:
An average established League One footballer is estimated to earn between £100k-£150k a year, so given that we can sign 4-6 established League One footballers without breaking the rules.
The sounds from within the club, according to local media, have been that the target is around 5-6 signings.

The above may explain why the players linked are all young and some even unestablished in senior football: They're inexpensive in wages.

But:
@KieranMaguire says SCMP is full of loopholes ().

1) only 50% of wages of player-coaches count towards SCMP.

2) on top of 75% of revenue, clubs can spend 100% of transfer fees received and 100% cash injections (not loans or shares!) from an owner.
So we can "spend what we want" provided Chansiri gifts the club money rather than loans it money or buys new shares in the club.

And we can spend more if we sell players with Windass, Iorfa and Bannan all either subject of bids or interest from the Championship.
Chansiri's combined investment 2015-2020 is £134m and I'd estimate £161m at the end of July 2021.

During Chansiri's time as legal owner he has, on average, invested £70,000 every single day (although it has slowed considerably, as costs have been cut, since 2018):
Report card time: I wasn't as precise with my 19-20 projections as I was for 18-19, but still within a reasonable range; certainly close enough to make projecting future financial numbers worthwhile:
If you would like to support me and see more stuff like the above I'll ask you kindly to consider donating a small amount to me via Ko-fi:
ko-fi.com/ploehmann

I'll still annoy you regularly with far too many charts even if you don't 😁

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter A. Løhmann

Peter A. Løhmann Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ploehmann

1 Apr
#swfc have 9 matches left to complete an unlikely relegation escape.

In the thread below, a look at the historical context of what a Great Escape would look like.

The points won by teams at the bottom of this season's Championship are tracking a typical season quite closely:
In general teams at the bottom improve their form more in the last 9 matches than teams further up the table, so we shouldn't assume the helping hand of a collapse by the teams above us:
The variation is quite big, though, and the most a team in 22nd after 37 matches ever won in the final 9 matches was 18 points. The same as the typical team in 1st:
Read 17 tweets
23 Mar
#swfc To follow up on @AlexMiller91's run through in the article below:

Wednesday's issue this season has been creating chances for the forwards, not the forwards converting their chances. A theme that has continued on from last season.

[thread below]
Our forwards this season are scoring at the same rate they were last season - a goal every third game/0.32 goals per 90 minutes - from the same general quality of chances (Expected Goals (xG) of 0.33 per 90 minutes):
The issue isn't so much our forwards scoring as it is our midfielders (and defenders) not scoring (and not getting chances).

The forwards are par for the course considering the quality of their chances, whereas defenders and midfielders "owe" 7-8 goals; same as last season:
Read 14 tweets
11 Mar
#swfc An attempt to make sense of our 2018/19 accounts, and football finance, in the far too long (sorry!) "read along" thread below.

tl;dr: Still in the purgatory of unsustainable spending and viable only for as long as Chansiri keeps underwriting £20m losses every year.
First things first: I'm just a dude in Denmark with a spreadsheet. There's no magic In The Know knowledge or other such things in what I do and have done. It's all based on publicly available sources of information treated to a bit of thinking.
How hard is it then to predict what the accounts will look like based on those public sources of information?

I've made projections repeatedly on Twitter over the last couple of years and perhaps summed up best in this blog post for @SWFCTrust:

swfctrust.co.uk/blog/wednesday…
Read 36 tweets
6 Mar
#swfc How did the season end from here in the last 22 seasons?

Not many teams escape the bottom 3 in the last 12 matches.

Only 8 of 88 Play-Offs contestants have come from outside top 8 after 34 matches. Historically speaking it's a myth that everything is still up for grabs:
21st, Birmingham, are currently on course for 46 points at season's end. 18 points more than we have currently.

But the points won per game in the last 12 is for the bottom positions is higher than the first 34 matches - whereas it actually declines for the top positions:
50% of 21st positions have had points per game between 0.07 and 0.43 points per game higher in the last 12 than the first 34 matches.

For 21st this season it's a points per game in the last 12 matches between 1.07 and 1.43, meaning a finish of between 47 and 51 points.
Read 12 tweets
27 Jan
#swfc are finally back in league action tonight 8pm GMT away to Coventry #pusb

A relegation six pointer to kick off our second half of the season with 7 points separating us in 23rd and them in 16th.

A look of our numbers and theirs below and what they can tell us.

[thread]
I looked at the survival prognosis for teams in our position yesterday ().

Thankfully a prognosis is not a prediction, but it does bear out just how important tonight's game is.
Can we quantify match importance then?

Well, @FiveThirtyEight have given it a right good go and how they've done it is explained here: fivethirtyeight.com/methodology/ho…

Their match importance rating ranges from 0 to 100 for a team.
Read 16 tweets
27 Jan
#swfc Derby's latest win over QPR leaves Wednesday six points adrift of 21st and safety with two matches in hand.

How have teams in those circumstances done in the previous 22 seasons?

[thread]
First off we have to equalise Derby's points tally to our number of matches.

If we use points won per game for everyone, and how many points that would give them after the same number of matches as us, 23, this is how the table would look:

A gap of 4, not 6, points.
After 23 matches, how often have teams been trailing 21st by 4 or more points?

24 times in the last 22 seasons.

Of those 24 teams just 4, 1 in 6, survived.

In their final 23 matches those 4 survivors won 27, 33, 35 and 40 points respectively:
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(