- ... is there some official way we can vote to have NZ govern the UK?
I'm thinking of a "power of attorney", a sort of temporary measure until we come to our senses?
I have many friends who have had COVID, all of which were double vaccinated with plenty of time for the immune system to adapt ... I am somewhat surprised to hear people talk about "fully vaccinated" as though that prevents you from becoming infected ... it lessens the impact.
If we are going to follow a path of "living with COVID" that means mandatory masks, new vaccinations, isolation and distancing need to become a permanent part of every day life unless we actually mean "living with ongoing deaths and harm from COVID"?
This is what confuses me with the whole "freedom day" thing ... we haven't beaten covid, it's still here, we're talking 100,000 cases a day, we don't have zero covid ... so "freedom" from what? Freedom from collective responsibility? Freedom from ... reality?
Or maybe it's freedom to i.e. not to care any more or freedom to get infected or .... I can't help but think that the main beneficiary from the "Freedom Day" will be the COVID virus itself. It makes no sense to me.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gosh, this is depressing. What we need to be doing is adapting i.e embracing a more remote first world not trying to push ourselves back into the past. Yes, I know that many miss their status symbols of power, the top floor offices etc ... but this is so flawed in thinking ->
In terms of messaging, in terms of lack of challenge over procurement, in terms of muddled thinking ... I struggle to think of a more hopeless chancellor since ... welll, gosh ... maybe Lawson, that seems an apt comparison.
X : What's wrong with the office?
Me : I've just finished a population study, so I can say with some confidence that the following are the next generation of company behaviours ... however ...
I always have the freedom to simply accept a poisonous or unhealthy relationship. If I want freedom from it then I need to deal with it and get rid of it.
Freedom from covid means zero covid and not putting up with covid.
"we consider any strategy that tolerates high levels of infection to be both unethical and illogical" - thelancet.com/journals/lance… ... unethical, illogical and dangerous seems to be the new motto for the Conservatives of late.
X : That's unfair.
Me : No. Cutting £20 per week or £1,000 per year from the poorest people with the greatest needs, pulling another 400,000 children below the poverty line and calling it the "right way to help people" - mirror.co.uk/news/politics/… ... that's unfair.
X : You have to re-architect for serverless or the spend and performance are terrible
Me : Of course. The real value is from the practices not the technology i.e. DevOps over cloud (IaaS), but you can't take advantage of the practices without rearchitecting for the technology .
Me : ... unfortunately that need to re-architect gives rise to various attempts to persuade people that you can have the advantages without rearchitecting, a sort of "you can have the future but just like the past. All you need to do is buy the technology!"
It's snake oil ...
Me : ... as in "you can become data driven if you just buy a data lake" or "become cloudy by installing a virtual data centre".
There's a long history of this. Some is well intentioned, it's all wrong though. To compound this, we also have inertia from past practices ...
People talk about living with COVID. I do understand but if we're going to adapt to living with COVID that means permanent use of masks, continued vaccination against variants, isolation and ongoing distancing. The only path to returning to past "normality" is zero covid.
By not embracing that path at the beginning, we have chosen a path where COVID will become a permanent feature, like the flu, with new variants appearing etc. This was obvious from the beginning and why I expect this to be a continuing issue at the next election.
Loved this. One slide which says it all. Before anyone goes "serverless is the future" ... no, "serverless is the norm" - it's just that so many are yet to realise this. Give it time, another five years or so ->
At which point, between 2024 to 2029, we will be reaching the "Oh f&*k" stage of enterprise adoption of serverless and you won't be able to hire serverless developers because every other company will be scrambling to do the same.
X : What's the future then?
Me : The future is always about practices, the technology is the underlying cause. The practices you should be concerned about today are highlighted in green (the grey is what you should have been concerned about in 2011).
For reference, that particular image I made in 2012, not 2016 - blog.gardeviance.org/2012/07/magic-… ... however, that's splitting hairs on years, the point is still the same. Well done MSFT, a good win for Azure.
I called Open Stack a dead duck in 2012 because the people running it didn't know what they were doing. Sure, it made money but Telcos gambling huge amounts of shareholder money on a "no hope" cause because of executive decree and ego is normal, not a guide to the future.
The only people who seemed to play the game well with OpenStack was VMware ... they used it to buy years, if not a decade of time for their company.