Alright, it's Publius Ventidius Bassus time - the only person (that I am aware of, at least) to have walked in a triumph twice, first as a captive and second as a triumphing general.
It's time for one of the most meteoric rises in Rome politics (sources at the end). 1/xx
Alright, curtain up, it is 89 BC and Rome is in a serious trouble. The allied communities of Italy - whose military support Rome has relied on to win its empire - are upset about being locked out of Roman citizenship.
They tried politics, it didn't work, so they try war. 2/xx
So big civil war in Italy. Our hero, P. Ventidius Bassus is approximately zero years old, living in Asculum. Asculum opts to join the rebellion.
This turns out to be a huge mistake, as Gnaeus Pompey Strabo (not that Pompey, his dad) defeats and sacks the city. 3/xx
Pompey Strabo executes the rebel leaders of the cities, seizes their property, takes a bunch of captives and - the dream of all Roman generals - holds a triumph in Rome.
It's a grand military parade through the city, displaying the victorious army and the spoils it took. 4/xx
In this case, those spoils include...Publius Ventidius Bassus, carried - we are told - by his mother (unnamed 🙄). Publius doesn't immediately wreck Pompey Strabo because he is - again - about zero years old.
Don't worry though, revenge is gonna be sweet. 5/xx
So we aren't sure exactly how Ventidius or his unnamed mother get out of that spot. We can be reasonably sure Ventidius (and thus presumably his mother) were not enslaved, so perhaps they were ransomed by family as captives. 6/xx
Fast forward now to 59. Ventidius is now about thirty years old and he is making a living renting mules and carts; it is not a big business. We're told he worked his way up to this still-very-much-humble profession from basically nothing. 7/xx
But you know who is about to need a whole lot of mules and carts? Gaius Julius Caesar, that's who.
He's planning to get Gaul as his province and engage in some big inland military campaigns and he is going to need logistics support.
Mules and carts! 8/xx
So Ventidius, who had been working as a supplier for other Roman governors, ends up working for Caesar in Gaul.
Sadly, Caesar doesn't mention our boy in his commentaries on the Gallic Wars, but we know that he made one heck of an impression. 9/xx
Because by the time the civil wars start up, Ventidius is getting put in charge of field units and is besties with one of Caesar's other officers, the always disappointing Marcus Antonius (Marc Antony).
Yes, yes, you all loved him in Rome, the actual guy was a doofus. 10/xx
Ventidius backs Caesar 110%, so when it's Rubicon crossing time (49) that's what he does. Caesar wins against Pompey (son of Pompey Strabo), which must have felt pretty f***ing sweet for Ventidius.
Caesar takes notice and in 45, Ventidius is tribune of the plebs 11/xx
But then 44 rolls around and Ventidius has problems. Caesar accidentally fell on Brutus and Cassius' knives 23 times and so he's dead.
In exchange for an amnesty that no one will honor, Caesar's followers get his office assignments for the following year confirmed. 12/xx
43 is a mixed bag. On the upside, Ventidius is praetor - second highest office in the SPQR - probably a result of Caesar's assignments.
On the downside, Caesar's best bud Antony is feuding with Cicero and the Senate and Caesar's adopted son Octavian is siding with Cicero. 13/xx
Ventidius up and raises three legions. But he looks at Antony and Octavian, about to have themselves a nice big fight outside of Mutina and thinks...
You know what, I'll let you all work this one out on your own.
He goes to Picenum and chills. 14/xx
This is going to turn out to be a pretty great calculation. Antony gets wrecked at Mutina and retreats and *then* Ventidius joins him about ten minutes before Octavian, Antony and Lepidus decide to let bygones be bygones so that they can Bye! Gone! Cicero. 15/xx
Octavian, Antony & Lepidus decide to split up power between them and in the process Octavian resigns the consulship he had after having murdered everyone in between him and it.
Never has someone murdered so many people for an office he will try so hard not to occupy. 16/xx
But the rules say there always need to be two consuls, so replacements are required (suffect consuls). Ventidius gets chosen and so our War Captive and Used Mule Dealer is now a consul of the Roman Republic.
::air horn noises:: 17/xx
Actually, Aulus Gellius tells us that people talked a lot of s*** about our boy Ventidius. Cicero, before he got ultra-murdered, called him a mule-driver (ahem, that's mule, *renter* - very different!)... 18/xx
And when he was elected consul people posted the verses, "Augurs and Haruspices assemble!/a strange portent has flared up just now/for the guy who washed mules, is now made consul!"
Turns out the ancients had s***posting too. 19/xx
Ventidius shakes it off, finishes his year as consul and then gets a series of provincial assignments (we're not super clear about them). Finally in 40, he's made the proconsular governor of Syria under Antony. 20/xx
Antony, while he has been musing a Parthian campaign, has left that frontier under-defended in the mean time and in 40, the Parthians, with some pro-Pompey dead-enders, invade. Antony is off partying with Cleopatra.
The only man in their way? P. Ventidius Bassus. 21/xx
The Roman governor of Asia, L. Munatius Plancus, runs off and the Parthian/Pompeian force moves in. Ventidius meets their army at the Cilician gates in 39 and wrecks it. Labienus, the dead-ender Pompeian, is killed.
22/xx
The following year, the Parthians are thinking, "Well, that hurt a little, but surely we win round 2."
NOPE. Battle of Cyrrhestica, 38 BC, Ventidius completely ruins a Parthian army, the Parthian crown prince Pacorus killed in the battle.
Get wrecked, its BASSUS TIME. 23/xx
Now Ventidius here is clever - he knows that Antony wants all of the glory of a victorious Parthian campaign and that stealing that glory from Antony would be unwise.
So instead he secures the frontier and then hands the army over to Antony for his big campaign. 24/xx
Antony, being Antony, *promptly* f***s it up, advancing too far, failing to guard his supplies fully, running out of food, failing in a siege and losing most of his army.
Even James Purefoy's smile couldn't save that disaster. 25/xx
(continues)
Ventidius wasn't there to save that disaster because he was busy being back at Rome celebrating his triumph for having utterly ruined two Parthian armies and re-secured Rome's eastern frontier.
He's the first Roman to triumph over the Parthians. 26/34
The previous guy having tried, Crassus, ended up very dead in 53 having over-extended, failed to guard his supply lines and lost all of his army.
And of course as Ventidius is celebrating his triumph, Antony is busy doing his best Crassus impression, minus dying himself. 27/34
Ventidius is going to be the only Roman to triumph over the Parthians until Trajan more than a century later.
Turns out the muleteer-consul really was a portent! It's pretty clear that Ventidius was an individual of exceptional ability. 28/34
We lose track of Ventidius fairly quickly after this. He's inducted into the College of Pontiffs, a prestigious priesthood, probably in 43.
He's got to be at least 51 in 38 when he celebrates his triumph. 29/34
We don't know when he died, but we are told by Aulus Gellius that he received a public funeral (in Rome). Since Octavian was running the show there after 42, that's a strong indicator that Ventidius managed to keep friendly with both sides of the Octavian/Antony rivalry. 30/34
It's possible that Ventidius passed away before that rivalry turned into war in 32 or that like many other Caesarian partisans (e.g. Sallust) he slid into private life to avoid further conflict.
In any case, he clearly didn't cross Octavian, given the public funeral. 31/34
And that's our man Publius Ventidius Bassus. Born without Roman citizenship, captive in a triumph, low-end mule-renter - then praetor, consul of Rome, triumphator and victorious general over the Parthians.
A truly remarkable career. 32/34
Sources!
The sources for Ventidius are spread out. He pops up in Plutarch's Life of Antony, briefly in Appian's Civil Wars and even more briefly in Vellius Paterculus' history. He has shit talked about him in Cicero's letter to Plancus (Cic. Ad. Fam. 10.18.3). 33/34
Two more sustained narratives comment on his life. Pliny gives him a few sentences as a remarkable example of gaining honors (Pliny, Natural History 7.135) and a longer section in Aulus Gellius' Attic Nights (15.4).
And there you have it. 34/end
Oh, and Hollywood types, yes I will absolutely consult for your miniseries on the Exciting Life of P. Ventidius Bassus entitled "All About That Bassus" in exchange for the low, low price of all of the money.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ok, so this ill-informed take has been bouncing around twitter for a day, so let's put it out of my misery.
@pegobry here is just wrong about the Sacred Band and thus has managed the rare feat of being wrong about something in the ancient world we are fairly certain about. 1/19
Ancient evidence being what it is (acoup.blog/2021/03/26/fir…), almost everything in ancient history comes with at least some residual uncertainty, but this fellow has managed to pick something quite certain to be wrong about.
So let's go through the evidence. 2/19
Plutarch is our clearest source and he relates (Plut. Pelop. 18.1-2, but also in the Moralia, etc) that the Theban Sacred Band, formed by Gorgidas, was "three hundred chosen men...some say composed of lovers and beloved." 3/19
It's focused specifically on Joseph Henrich's recent 'WEIRD' book, but the critique is more broadly useful. 1/9
In some ways, the article's focus on Henrich is actually unfortunate (though this is one of those 'this isn't the article I'd have written things, so grain of salt at the ready) because it leads it into a bit of a rabbit hole about 'the West' particular to that work... 2/9
...whereas to me the more direct issue here - if I may indulge in a strained analogy - is not the particular ugly face mounted on the top of the data-driven pseudo-history statue, but the clay feet at the bottom. 3/9
I keep coming back to the metaphor of a 'playbook' when it comes to pre-modern logistics. I think it is much better than trying to think in terms of a logistics 'system.'
That's not to say that pre-modern logistics is dumb or underdeveloped though.... 1/21
The difference is that prior to railroads, steamships and trucks, logistics (which in that context mostly means the 4Fs - food, fodder, firewood and f-water - hey, alright, it sounded cooler than the 3FnW) is much more sensitive to local conditions. 2/21
The modern brute-force solution of 'transport everything from strategic supply reserves in the home country' isn't possible when overland transport is so expensive and naval transport may be unavailable due to geography, winds, sailing season, etc. 3/21
And to be clear, I'm not dismissing or ripping on the CAS. I'm sure they're pushing hard with the resources they have to do what they can. But I've never gotten the sense their efforts are central to how @scsclassics views itself.
Good thread. 'The discipline and the public culture' want the research work of lots of teaching-track and adjunct historians (and classicists, by the by), but have no idea how - or worse yet, no intention to - fund that. Or really incentivize it at all. 1/20
And it does need to be funded. While a lot of pop history can be written with nothing more than google and a public library (though not necessarily written well!), doing real, rigorous historical research requires expensive resources. 2/20
The books needed for research are often very expensive, meaning that you really need the support of a university library which can buy these things. Research trips to archives or museums to examine primary source material directly are expensive and need to be funded. 3/20
I am going to engage in some #ClassicsDiscourse; you will all have to forgive me.
When I saw that @AntigoneJournal was running a bit by Peter Singer, I was disappointed. When I *read* the bit by Singer I was...confused?
This? This is what you flushed your reputation for?
1/14
I will, I hope, spare you all from reading it (google will provide if you must) but for the better part of 800 words, Singer tells that he had never known about Apuleius' Metamorphoses (aka 'The Golden Ass') until quite recently. "Hey I just read this" - not a great start. 2/14
He concludes, and I am not at all kidding you, that this must be because it is *bad* - because how else would noted ::checks notes:: philosopher, animal rights advocate and eugenicist (careful, that last step is a doozy) have missed it?