Hitler wasn't like, the secret grandson of Woodrow Wilson or the old Kaiser.
I mean it was handled badly across all three movies, what wasn't, but I don't think Snoke needed to be anything more than "the latest jerk with Force powers and an army" from JJ's own screenplay.
Well it depends on what "theorizing" is. If you mean like, an explanation of the First Order's political origins, IDK where the space for that would be except in TFA itself, and JJ didn't bother. If you mean "Snoke was actually Plo Koon", even worse.
That all three movies, somehow, got made without anyone explaining just who was running the galaxy this time, that's bad. An explanation for Snoke's powers and position? IDK, there was a power vacuum, some jerk had the Force, saw an opportunity...I didn't have a problem with it.
I don't mean that the space wizard movie needed a detailed legislative structure, but just like, some normal people (after the first few minutes of TFA), were they scared, were they hopeful, did they care at all.
In the OT, it seems like people are kind of in denial about the Empire's control, for example.
Yeah this is why I don't have a problem with like, "Pycelle is a Lannister bastard" theories. It does fit THAT setting.
(I don't necessarily love it, I think I'd prefer if Pycelle is just like, some official foolishly over-impressed with Tywin's image, but it's plausible enough, follows the text.)
I feel terrible for all the people writing novelizations and things, who I'm sure all put in a lot more thought than JJ and co, to no avail.
Maybe a little more. Depends on how you define it and I don't have that spreadsheet handy.
This says the region in green had 3 million residents in 2015, maybe that's 11% of the state population, presumably a smaller % of the state electorate.
Saw "Black Widow". Thought it was...the usual MCU quality level?
Disney and MGM should have broken whatever FTC rules necessary to collude to avoid putting trailers for "Shang-Chi" and "Snake Eyes Origins" near each other because I think it will actively hurt both movies...
"Loki" is reminding me of my pet theory that Cisco's old girlfriend on "The Flash" was supposed to be an alternate version of himself and they chickened out.
(I don't even know if this counts as a theory or if they just conveyed the information badly.)
I mean "Spy" with his co-star Jason Statham only has a 3.2 when it deserves around a 5.3, people can't be helped.
But that's kind of the point, sure such metrics underrate his genre, but the kinds of people who tell you to check out "Spy" or "Crank" with Jason Statham don't seem to often recommend "Skyscraper" or "San Andreas", either.