I mean "Spy" with his co-star Jason Statham only has a 3.2 when it deserves around a 5.3, people can't be helped.
But that's kind of the point, sure such metrics underrate his genre, but the kinds of people who tell you to check out "Spy" or "Crank" with Jason Statham don't seem to often recommend "Skyscraper" or "San Andreas", either.
Yeah I haven't seen either but the "Jumanji" sequels are about as organic a hit as franchise sequels could possibly be, they must be doing something right.
Maybe a little more. Depends on how you define it and I don't have that spreadsheet handy.
This says the region in green had 3 million residents in 2015, maybe that's 11% of the state population, presumably a smaller % of the state electorate.
Saw "Black Widow". Thought it was...the usual MCU quality level?
Disney and MGM should have broken whatever FTC rules necessary to collude to avoid putting trailers for "Shang-Chi" and "Snake Eyes Origins" near each other because I think it will actively hurt both movies...
"Loki" is reminding me of my pet theory that Cisco's old girlfriend on "The Flash" was supposed to be an alternate version of himself and they chickened out.
(I don't even know if this counts as a theory or if they just conveyed the information badly.)
Hitler wasn't like, the secret grandson of Woodrow Wilson or the old Kaiser.
I mean it was handled badly across all three movies, what wasn't, but I don't think Snoke needed to be anything more than "the latest jerk with Force powers and an army" from JJ's own screenplay.