Saw "Black Widow". Thought it was...the usual MCU quality level?
Disney and MGM should have broken whatever FTC rules necessary to collude to avoid putting trailers for "Shang-Chi" and "Snake Eyes Origins" near each other because I think it will actively hurt both movies...
I guess that's not the same set?
But I am most hyped for "Reminiscence". Yes give me this fell-off-the-back-of-a-truck-Christopher-Nolan, (seemingly) dead wife and all.
Literally watching the trailer (I'd never heard of the movie) I was like, did Christopher Nolan's nephew make this or something? Then "from an un-named creator of Westworld".
Am I being unfair...no, that is what it looks like. Still want to see it though.
It's funny how the Marvel/MCU sliding timeline deals with Black Widow not being old enough to be a Soviet agent by now (mostly, by ignoring it).
David Harbour was in his teens when the USSR collapsed, yet plays Red Guardian, someone who was presumably at least in his 20s when fighting for the commies. I know, "super-slow-aging" etc.
The only real fixed points are Captain America has to be a WWII veteran and Magneto has to be a Holocaust survivor. Everything else can shift and has.
Also why does Black Widow fall under the "Sokovia Accords". Does she have any powers? I feel like the movie actually tries to suggest she does but whatever.
I liked the ridiculous "Smells Like Teen Spirit" cover over the opening credits and am mostly mad we didn't get closing credits, which is unusual for the MCU. Maybe because there's only one credit scene.
But I like the elaborate closing credit sequences, it's part of the whole production.
I guess IDK if they ever have both elaborate opening credits AND elaborate closing credits. But the "Black Widow" opening credits were obviously meant as opening credits...
Anyway again I thought "Black Widow" was only an ok movie. But considering the track record of prequels and midquels, maybe it should be graded on a curve.
Slight spoiler, but disassociating the Black Widows from any particular government (maybe inevitable from both timeline wonkiness and uh, corporate delicacies in an international market perhaps) makes it all feel a bit more juvenile and over-personalized.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Maybe a little more. Depends on how you define it and I don't have that spreadsheet handy.
This says the region in green had 3 million residents in 2015, maybe that's 11% of the state population, presumably a smaller % of the state electorate.
"Loki" is reminding me of my pet theory that Cisco's old girlfriend on "The Flash" was supposed to be an alternate version of himself and they chickened out.
(I don't even know if this counts as a theory or if they just conveyed the information badly.)
I mean "Spy" with his co-star Jason Statham only has a 3.2 when it deserves around a 5.3, people can't be helped.
But that's kind of the point, sure such metrics underrate his genre, but the kinds of people who tell you to check out "Spy" or "Crank" with Jason Statham don't seem to often recommend "Skyscraper" or "San Andreas", either.
Hitler wasn't like, the secret grandson of Woodrow Wilson or the old Kaiser.
I mean it was handled badly across all three movies, what wasn't, but I don't think Snoke needed to be anything more than "the latest jerk with Force powers and an army" from JJ's own screenplay.