The most striking thing to me isn't the headline numbers, it's this graph.
Basically, it says the heatwave was statistically "impossible". Let me elaborate...
The graph, shown above, looks at temperature patterns observed in the Pacific Northwest over the last 70 years and applies what is known as Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) theory to it.
The fit, shown in red, looks pretty reasonable. 2/
One of the features of GEV is that it sometimes predicts that a statistical system as a finite limit.
That occurs when the data presents a downward curving slope, as it does here. 3/
To be concrete, the analysis presented above says:
In the 70 years prior to 2021, the worst observed heatwave for the region corresponds to an average of ~35 °C (95 °F).
The GEV model estimates the worst possible is ~37 °C (99 °F).
But in 2021, we reached 39.5 °C (103 °F).
4/
The GEV model said that 39.5 °C was "impossible", but it happened anyway.
Now obviously, if it happened then it was actually possible, so what is it really telling us?
5/
It suggests that the 2021 heatwave may have had a qualitatively different origin or dynamics than all the other Pacific Northwest heatwaves of the last 70 years.
6/
That kind of thing happens sometimes with extremes in physical systems.
For example, 70 years of normal rain data may badly fail to predict how much rain is possible during a hurricane, because a hurricane is dynamically different from normal rain-producing processes.
7/
The statistics suggest that the Pacific Northwest heat storm was not merely more extreme than past events, but perhaps also qualitatively different.
So, *if* the event was qualitatively different from past events, then we ask in what way?
8/
The first option is that the heat storm was a proverbial hurricane, e.g. a rare dynamical interaction that has always been possible, but so rare that in 70 years of data we never observed a weather pattern that was qualitatively similar.
9/
The second option is that we are seeing unfamiliar dynamics because the climate system has changed at large scales in ways we don't yet fully understand.
I consider this the scarier option.
10/
Right now, we don't know the answer.
In all likelihood, entire PhDs will be written about the Pacific Northwest heat storm.
But nature has thrown us a scary curve ball, and we'll have to wait and see if this was just an exceedingly rare one-off or a sign of more to come.
11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One way to measure a heatwave is by how much temperatures have exceeded normal conditions.
By that metric, the heatwave in the Pacific Northwest has essentially tied, or possible even exceeded, the most severe summer heatwave ever observed anywhere in North America.
The previous graphic also helps to clarify why it is so shocking to have been seeing these weather models forecast temperatures +36 °F (+20 °C) above normal.
Historically, that essentially never happens, anywhere in North America during the summer months.
Yesterday, Portland International Airport reported 112 °F (44.4 °C) far exceeding any historical precedent.
That would be like Dallas reaching 130 °F (54 °C) or Madrid at 120 °F (49 °C).
Today, Portland is forecast to be even hotter at 114 °F (45.5 °C).
❌ In a national referendum, Switzerland has repealed their local "CO₂ Law", rolling back the associated carbon tax, and severely undermining Swiss efforts to locally reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
Firstly, the result. The referendum on the "CO₂ Law" was narrowly decided:
Support 1,568,036 (48.4%)
Repeal 1,671,150 (51.6%)
59.7% of voters participated which is very high for Switzerland.
2/
The repeal of the Swiss CO₂ Law makes it very likely that Switzerland will ultimately miss their stated goal of a 50% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions by 2030 relative to 1990 levels.
Under existing laws, only a bit more than 1/2 of this target reduction is expected.
3/
Simple comparison between global mean temperature and carbon dioxide.
This is not the whole story of global warming, far from it, but it is a useful place to start.
Of course, correlation is not causation.
That's why physical understanding is needed.
We have understood for well over 100 years that carbon dioxide (CO₂) absorbs thermal radiation from the Earth's surface and contributes to the greenhouse effect.
The greenhouse effect is the process by which Earth's atmosphere captures and recycles energy from the Earth's surface.
This results in an Earth approximately ~30 °C (55 °F) warmer than one would expect without an atmosphere.
Human actions have been transforming the Earth's surface for thousands of years.
A selection of time slices from the animation to further emphasize the shifts from uninhabited and sparsely inhabited land use type to more heavily populated and agricultural land uses.
The authors of the paper (with @EarthOutreach) have previously provided an online mapping tool for exploring the changes over time on local and regional scales.
A year ago, when COVID was just taking off in many places, I never expected that China would actually end up as one of the least affected countries.
China's official COVID death toll stands at 4,636.
That's probably an undercount for several reasons, but even if the truth were twice as high it would still be a very low rate of death compared to most Western countries.
What China appears to have achieved early in the pandemic was the complete elimination of local transmission.
Few countries seriously tried to do this, and even fewer succeeded.