@KeillerDon I looked at the 700 million year ago Snowball Earth theory about 15 years ago and it seemed very sketchy to me. Some Canadian geologists (who are very experienced in glacial geology) argued that formations more likely to be flood related than glacier related.
@KeillerDon 2/ a key proponent of Snowball Earth theory was Mann's friend, Richard Alley. I didn't try to parse relative merits of two theories, but, if I had to choose, would pick the Canadian geologists. If geological formations can be explained without glaciers,
@KeillerDon 3/ then physics problem of trying to explain entry into and exit from Proterozoic Snowball Earth become moot.
@KeillerDon 4/ in this perspective, the Pleistocene is end result of very profound and continuing cooling of the entire planet since the Eocene, gradually becoming more and more intense due to CO2 starvation with most recent Ice Age being a more or less uniquely intense cold phenomenon.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen McIntyre

Stephen McIntyre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClimateAudit

9 Jul
one of the big mistakes by everyone in connection with Steele dossier is to think in terms of LeCarre's Cold War epics, when the reality is LeCarre's Tailor of Panama. Read this excerpt. Image
2/ Danchenko corresponds to Harry, the Tailor of Panama, who is recruited by Osnard, an ambitious and greedy idiot in UK spy agency. Harry needed money. Like Danchenko. Harry had no sources, so he made them up. Transforming nobodies into "sources", then making up stories.
3/ the plot line of Tailor of Panama is a re-make of Graham Greene's 1959 novella Our Man in Havana, another "spy" recruited by UK spy agency who had no sources, so he made everything up.
Read 5 tweets
4 Jul
remember Mueller's famous "not in my purview" answers re Steele dossier (among others)?

Extraordinary to re-read transcripts of stonewalling in 2017 and 2018 where DOJ/RBI lawyers prevented witness questioning on Steele dossier because it was under investigation by Mueller
2/ here's one example (Many others.) Trisha Anderson (FBI deputy general counsel) attended "meetings with McCabe" about Steele reports and what FBI had "learned about facts
that might bear on his credibility as a source".
3/ one of the three FBI lawyers from Office of General Counsel stopped Anderson from answering, first to consult, then to refuse because "questions pertain to matters that are being looked at by the special counsel". (Side question: Why cloak senior FBI lawyers in redactions?)
Read 11 tweets
27 Jun
recent US Supreme Ct decision established narrow interpretation of computer hacking act USC 1030. jdsupra.com/legalnews/supr…

It is relevant to Assange extradition, which relied on 8 year statute of limitations for 1030. I discussed issue in 2019
The recent decision pointed to a split in circuit courts on broadness of Computer Fraud Act.
3/ in my 2019 commentary on Manning and Assange cases, I had noted that the same inconsistency between circuit courts was critical to Assange extradition:
Read 8 tweets
25 Jun
@shipwreckedcrew the "Russian guy" was the person to whom Danchenko attributed pee tape story. And the FBI interviewed him about Danchenko within (literally) one week, maximum two, of the supposed exchange of "information" about pee tape. So yes, files need to be searched.
@shipwreckedcrew 2/ furthermore, when Crossfire Hurricane analysts learned that Danchenko was Steele's Primary Sub-Source in late Dec/early Jan, it is inconceivable that they didn't search "Danchenko" name in FBI files. If they didn't, FBI is even more incompetent than we thought.
@shipwreckedcrew 3/ regardless of what Vorontsov may or may not have said in the June 2016 interview, Danchenko was already on FBI radar and the search of records by analysts in Dec 2016 ought to have turned up these records. If they didn't, then more incompetence.
Read 5 tweets
24 Jun
Lee Smith has interesting article on Vorontsov Affidavit. Reasonable people can disagree on interpretation of these murky events and I disagree totally on most of Lee's interpretation, while also being glad that he commented on document.
Lee asks the same question that I began asking a couple of days ago: it is astounding that FBI was asking a Danchenko sub-source about Danchenko seven months before Danchenko named Vorontsov as a sub-source.
Lee notes (as both of us have long said) that Steele's instantaneous, too instantaneous, "intelligence" was only possible because it was fabricated. Bespoke intel porn, so to speak.
Read 13 tweets
21 Jun
fascinating new documents on Danchenko. courtlistener.com/docket/6163126… Scroll to 153.
wow. In June 2016 (!?!), Vorontsov, while attending a reception at US ambassador, was "whisked away" by FBI agents and interviewed about Danchenko. June 2016!!
3/ if Danchenko was already on FBI radar in June 2016, his identification as Steele's Primary Sub-Source by FBI intel analysts in late 2016 ought to have set off five-bell alarm in FBI. 🔥😡🔥
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(