one of the big mistakes by everyone in connection with Steele dossier is to think in terms of LeCarre's Cold War epics, when the reality is LeCarre's Tailor of Panama. Read this excerpt.
2/ Danchenko corresponds to Harry, the Tailor of Panama, who is recruited by Osnard, an ambitious and greedy idiot in UK spy agency. Harry needed money. Like Danchenko. Harry had no sources, so he made them up. Transforming nobodies into "sources", then making up stories.
3/ the plot line of Tailor of Panama is a re-make of Graham Greene's 1959 novella Our Man in Havana, another "spy" recruited by UK spy agency who had no sources, so he made everything up.
4/ but the truth is stranger than fiction. The real plot of the Steele dossier narrative only begins after the election, when Comey and the FBI weaponized Danchenko's fantasies to undermine the incoming Trump administration by imposing Mueller-Weissmann special counsel.
5/ to be precise, above excerpt is from a contemporary book review of Tailor of Panama, not a quote from LeCarre (who would never articulate his plot line like this; LeCarre plot lines unfold gradually.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@KeillerDon I looked at the 700 million year ago Snowball Earth theory about 15 years ago and it seemed very sketchy to me. Some Canadian geologists (who are very experienced in glacial geology) argued that formations more likely to be flood related than glacier related.
@KeillerDon 2/ a key proponent of Snowball Earth theory was Mann's friend, Richard Alley. I didn't try to parse relative merits of two theories, but, if I had to choose, would pick the Canadian geologists. If geological formations can be explained without glaciers,
@KeillerDon 3/ then physics problem of trying to explain entry into and exit from Proterozoic Snowball Earth become moot.
remember Mueller's famous "not in my purview" answers re Steele dossier (among others)?
Extraordinary to re-read transcripts of stonewalling in 2017 and 2018 where DOJ/RBI lawyers prevented witness questioning on Steele dossier because it was under investigation by Mueller
2/ here's one example (Many others.) Trisha Anderson (FBI deputy general counsel) attended "meetings with McCabe" about Steele reports and what FBI had "learned about facts
that might bear on his credibility as a source".
3/ one of the three FBI lawyers from Office of General Counsel stopped Anderson from answering, first to consult, then to refuse because "questions pertain to matters that are being looked at by the special counsel". (Side question: Why cloak senior FBI lawyers in redactions?)
The recent decision pointed to a split in circuit courts on broadness of Computer Fraud Act.
3/ in my 2019 commentary on Manning and Assange cases, I had noted that the same inconsistency between circuit courts was critical to Assange extradition:
@shipwreckedcrew the "Russian guy" was the person to whom Danchenko attributed pee tape story. And the FBI interviewed him about Danchenko within (literally) one week, maximum two, of the supposed exchange of "information" about pee tape. So yes, files need to be searched.
@shipwreckedcrew 2/ furthermore, when Crossfire Hurricane analysts learned that Danchenko was Steele's Primary Sub-Source in late Dec/early Jan, it is inconceivable that they didn't search "Danchenko" name in FBI files. If they didn't, FBI is even more incompetent than we thought.
@shipwreckedcrew 3/ regardless of what Vorontsov may or may not have said in the June 2016 interview, Danchenko was already on FBI radar and the search of records by analysts in Dec 2016 ought to have turned up these records. If they didn't, then more incompetence.
Lee Smith has interesting article on Vorontsov Affidavit. Reasonable people can disagree on interpretation of these murky events and I disagree totally on most of Lee's interpretation, while also being glad that he commented on document.
Lee asks the same question that I began asking a couple of days ago: it is astounding that FBI was asking a Danchenko sub-source about Danchenko seven months before Danchenko named Vorontsov as a sub-source.
Lee notes (as both of us have long said) that Steele's instantaneous, too instantaneous, "intelligence" was only possible because it was fabricated. Bespoke intel porn, so to speak.
wow. In June 2016 (!?!), Vorontsov, while attending a reception at US ambassador, was "whisked away" by FBI agents and interviewed about Danchenko. June 2016!!
3/ if Danchenko was already on FBI radar in June 2016, his identification as Steele's Primary Sub-Source by FBI intel analysts in late 2016 ought to have set off five-bell alarm in FBI. 🔥😡🔥