As usual, Monday’s modelling thread produced some excellent questions, and apologies that I wasn’t able to answer all of them. But as a small corrective, I’d like to offer answers now to four of the most common / relevant questions, in a short thread:
Q1: what happens if you vaccinate teenagers? As it happens I did look at this, but ran out of time & space to give you the results on Monday. The short answer is that it doesn’t make much difference to the model results, because I’m assuming that...
…(as per @PaulMainwood analysis) we don’t have enough mRNA supply to vaccinate more than a small % of teenagers before September, and by then the summer wave is mostly over. The one exception is in the scenario (below) where we delay opening…
to September, and my assumptions are proved badly wrong (on the downside) so we get a second autumn wave, then the teenage vaccinations can have a material impact – see below
BUT that’s not to say we shouldn’t do it, and this is one area that I’d be particularly cautious in using my model to drive a policy recommendation, because it’s not fully age-stratified, and I could easily imagine getting a different result from a more sophisticated model.
Q2: what’s the split of vaccinated and unvaccinated in those who end up in hospital? The answer is it’s about 40% unvaccinated, and 60% vaccinated (with at least 1 dose). This varies a bit by age group – it’s more like 25% unvaxxed in the over-70s, and 80% in the under-50s.
This is a very predictable consequence of the assumptions on vaccine take-up and the effectiveness (vs. severe disease) of the vaccines - and the variation by age group or JCVI category is due to different assumptions on vaccine take-up in the different groups.
Q3: how many people are infected / hospitalised in your exit wave? Roughly speaking, the exit wave in the central case has about 5.7m infections, and 90k hospitalisations. At peak, we’re looking at around 750k infections (and 12k hospitalisations) in a week….
….so just over 100k infections per day (and just under 2k hospitalisations per day). Allowing for the fact that we don’t record all infections as cases, that’s maybe 50-60k cases per day. And a shade over 2% prevalence at the peak, which would be similar to January.
Q4: what does your model say about Long Covid? The short answer is “not much” because I haven’t tried to model it – but that doesn’t mean I don’t think it’s real or important, just that I haven’t had time yet to study the data closely enough to decide on a model parameter.
If you have a view on how many people (as a % of infections) are likely to have ongoing symptoms of a particular type or severity, then you can multiply that by the infection figure I’ve given above to estimate the number of sufferers arising from the exit wave. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So it’s time for me to come off the fence re 19th July. I’m in favour of:
a) Opening up on 19/7, but with stronger mitigating baseline measures than the govt is proposing
b) Opening up vaccinations to 12-17s as supply permits, starting with the vulnerable.
Long🧵follows...
I’m very conscious that many people will disagree with something I’ve said there, and possibly all of it. And I have good friends on all sides of these debates, who I don’t want to lose. So it may help to say: just because you oppose (or support) vaccination of teenagers…
…doesn’t mean that I think you’re a psychopath. And just because you might support extending regulations for another few weeks, doesn’t mean I think you’re a “bedwetter”, or uncaring about those who have suffered during lockdown. So I’d be grateful if you…
and if you prefer to look at the case data instead of growth rates, here it is:
and if you just prefer numbers, here are two to consider:
- England cases in 20-24 age group, specimen date 28th June: 4510
- same figure 7 days later, on 5th July: 4548
(and yes, I know there could still be some late tests reported for that date tomorrow or thereafter)
This is my new favourite graph of the week: case growth rates down (or roughly flat) over the last week in nearly every age group. There’s just one fly in the ointment: rising growth in the 90+, which is not the group I would choose for that pattern.
Here’s the more familiar graphs by age group, starting with the 0-30s:
There’s plenty of bad news on the dashboard this evening, with hospitalisations and deaths joining cases in growing by over 40% week-on-week. But is it just me, or does that case curve look like it’s starting to curve over to the right?
Of course, this will be no surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention to the age-stratified growth rates over the last week. And the pattern here continues, with growth rates continuing to fall in the under-30s:
I’m not going to do a very long model update thread, because it’s a busy week at work and I do actually need to get some sleep at some point. But I thought you might appreciate some headline conclusions from the latest version, as it might help inform the debate re. 19 July 1/n
I’m also not going to give you a policy recommendation, because it’s a genuinely tough call, and as usual I’m going to take it to the wire before getting off the fence (and I’ll stop the mixed metaphors there, before I do myself a nasty – if imaginary – injury). 2/n
So as usual I’ve updated to all the latest data and made a few other adjustments in an attempt to get as close as possible to a genuine “central view” i.e. as likely to be wrong on the upside as the downside. This week, those changes have included: 3/n