Back to Fred. Fred uses Ethereum to move dollars, so he's unwilling to spend more than $5 in gas to transact - else he'll go to TradFi.
So, regardless of the price of $ETH, Fred can only do his transaction when gas is $5.
I'll assume the average opportunity cost of transactions remains the same across all actors, at $5 - aka I'll assume everyone buying $ETH for gas is like Fred.
This won't be an empirically true assumption, Ethereum offers different value to different actors, but bear with me.
In that world, $5 buys same # of transactions whether at low ETH/high gas prices or high ETH/low gas prices bc regardless of $ETH price, I'm willing to spend $5 on gas, so gas prices will go to $5.
gas = 1ETH, ETH= $5
or
gas=5ETH, ETH=$1
same $5 opportunity cost to transact
This is why fees spike when $ETH is rocketing upwards AND when it is crashing downwards.
In both moments, speculators are willing to pay more to transact bc the opportunity cost of not transacting is higher. Gas fees rise as a result.
Gas Fees = opportunity cost
So now we understand why if opportunity cost of not transacting stays the same & unstaked $ETH prices rise, gas prices will fall.
Let's get back to the point.
People transacting on the network are $ETH buyers who are $ETH price-insensitive and gas price-sensitive.
Let's repeat some key facts about them:
- These are people who CANNOT replace their price insensitive $ETH buying with buying of staked ETH derivatives. They're limited to that small fraction of unstaked ETH.
- Did I mention that they're price insensitive?
The inevitable result is that the price of unstaked $ETH must rise so gas fee burn represents a smaller % of unstaked ETH OR demand for gas must fall.
The max gas fees as % unstaked ETH depends on *unstaked* ETH order book thickness because again, these buyers can't buy stETH.
Pause to think about what liquidity looks like here.
Do you think big institutional players who are HODLing ETH as an investment asset are holding the unstaked ETH?
Nope. They'd be pouring free yield down the drain in a yield starved world.
The unstaked $ETH order book will come solely from a actors moving within a small fraction of total $ETH supply.
It will be dominated by $ETH price insensitive buyers. Gas buyers.
This is where the rubber meets the road.
This is where the network's value accrues to price.
The wild thing is throughout the entire history of $ETH, price has always moved on speculator's assessment of future value.
Looking at transaction volumes on the Ethereum network has been a fun way to hype, but always just an indirect actor on price.
After PoS and EIP1559, (at least at these levels of transaction volumes), $ETH prices will be forcibly moved at a lower limit by Ethereum network activity itself.
This is another tail wagging the dog story as the value of that small supply of unstaked $ETH will determine the entire market cap.
(See my substack writeup linked above for why staked ETH must be at least as valuable as unstaked ETH at all times after the merge)
I mentioned that the reason gas prices go up when $ETH spikes up or crashes down is transactions are more valuable to speculators in those moments.
This is another way value can accrue to the network. The cost of *not* transacting could just get higher.
If transacting on $ETH becomes more valuable...
Concretely: If I'm willing to pay more of my monthly salary in gas each month because I *need* the transactions more than I do now...
Then total gas spent, the value of the Ethereum network, and the value of $ETH will rise.
What would make me *need* to transact on Ethereum more than I do now?
DeFi needs to make TradFi cost & trust prohibitive.
It needs to lower the barrier to learn to use its products & make products that I can't afford to not use everyday.
With DeFi comes $ETH. Fin.
I'd love to know what y'all think!
Also if you've been shouting this idea everywhere and I just missed it somehow, apologies - link & I'll happily RT.
For the #DeFi project to succeed, it must become an existential threat to traditional finance.
This is capitalism at its finest, and the war will be fought on many fronts.
I can't stop thinking that the @Visa - USDC announcement represents the first major battleground. 👇
Why would visa do this? Why now? The is not casual intrigue. For visa to settle with stable-coins they have to significantly invest in the crypto space.
Disclaimer on quality: this is stream of consciousness. I'm just riffing here haha
Predicting short-term price is speculative, but can be useful learning to get feedback on my feel for "the pulse" of the market and train 'market instincts'
@RyanWatkins_ inspired me to take a shot at this for $ETH as we break above $3k
I think I found something listening to @RealVision pod on the plane yesterday. I’ve been looking for a while for something with a discrete catalyst that occurs before the triple halving so I could raise some funds to buy more $ETH.
Listen to this episode. All uranium public equities combined are $20B market cap. That’s like 1/35 of $TSLA. Also supply has been 0, mines shut since Fukushima. France, Spain surprised by renewing contracts…there are forces at play. But more!
@malopez1975 tells @LynAldenContact that nuclear reactors are going to have to get new contract roughly end of Q2, early Q3. This is a concrete time frame - I paused, rewind like 4x to make sure I caught it.
I put everything I had into this piece. As a retail investor, I want to use this report to show how much I’ve learned about investing and share my current highest conviction idea. If I’m capable of writing institutional grade research - this is it.