Today President Biden will issue an executive order on”Promoting Competition in the American Economy”, I’ll save the conversation about doing this action by EO for reg experts like my @aaf colleagues @DtheGman and @Dan_Bosch but some early thoughts on what’s known to be in it
And here’s the link to what I’m basing these thoughts/discussion on whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
First, the EO is overly concerned about concentration and seems to indicate Big will always mean bad for consumers. This is not true as @ITIFdc’s work has discussed itif.org/publications/2…
I’d also point you to their (@ITIFdc) recent piece about how alarm over increasing concentration is not the reality when more closely examined itif.org/publications/2…
Secondly, it should be pointed out that this EO impacts a wide range of industries from agriculture to technology.
Notably it will allow after the fact challenge of mergers that were not previously reviewed.
The problem with this is that it’s
hard to prove what a counter factual would have looked like (ie would the success happened separately) and it can punish companies that take risky bets that benefit consumers
Okay continuing let’s get to the parts about tech and telecom
Beginning with the EO’s requirement to restore #netneutrality. Because more regulations and requirements will make it easier on smaller players to enter the market somehow? 🤷‍♀️ (and yes there are small ISPs)
I really don’t want to rehash the whole #netneutrality debate in this thread but in short the doomsday definitely did not occur and you can read my most recent thoughts on it here: americanactionforum.org/insight/the-pr…
Okay now on to the #bigtech section
It opens with greater scrutiny of mergers an idea that is largely related to the myth of the kill zone. My go to piece on that is this one from @WillRinehart medium.com/cgo-benchmark/…
Then it moves on to calls for data regulation to protect small businesses. When what it is effectively calling for is to do away with those pesky consumer harming generics like AmazonBasics and the Kirkland brand.
Oh and it throws in right to repair. I haven’t dealt with that topic in a while but you can read and old piece I wrote on it here: readplaintext.com/should-you-be-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jennifer Huddleston

Jennifer Huddleston Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jrhuddles

8 Jul
It’s late so I’ll save more thoughts for but ICYMI the latest big tech #antitrust case has been filed
These days whenever such a case is filed my first 2 questions are: what actions do they allege are negatively impact consumer welfare (particularly when consumers often benefiting) & what are they considering the market (this seems to be particularly an issue for tech cases)?
More thoughts and links to relevant work to come tomorrow
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(