(first, JCWI is a charity, it is extremely odd to refer to us as a 'left wing pressure group' & I hope the Times will amend this promptly)
Several asylum seekers are currently serving prison sentences for actions the CPS now admits should not have been prosecuted. It's not over.
The law against facilitating illegal entry has traditionally been used to prosecute smugglers.
People bringing migrants to the UK, often with no regard to their safety, for money.
Only recently has the govt started using it, horrifyingly, to prosecute asylum seekers themselves.
They have been pursuing these prosecutions despite the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders telling them in Dec 2019 that "there were no organised crime group members onboard the boats" & that smuggling gangs operate only in France. gov.uk/government/pubβ¦
There's more. The NCA also warned them that it had received intelligence of asylum seekers being subjected to forced labour by smugglers in France, that they had no choice but to assist by e.g. steering boats across the Channel. Essentially that they're victims of modern slavery.
This govt's approach to Channel crossings plays right into the hands of smugglers.
One refugee from Yemen said "[The smuggler] told me, βI can kill you here, no one will identify me & I will escape.β He said, βI could now accuse you of being a smuggler, you could be in jail."
That quote from this excellent Indy piece by Lizzie Dearden. The information about this stuff has been out there for months.
The government choses to continue to pursue the victims of smugglers EXACTLY as the smugglers themselves rely on them doing. independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-nβ¦
Finally the CPS has published new guidance clarifying the law: entering the UK to seek asylum, even when forced to do so through irregular means, is not a crime and must not be prosecuted.
This is a very good thing, an important protection for refugees in desperate situations.
Back to the astonishing response from the Tories in the Times article that got me ranting this morning. This is important, it's what they'll say when defending their awful Bill over the next months in parliament.
It is despicable to continue to smear asylum seekers as smugglers.
I also find it interesting that the Times has quoted both those MPs without naming them...
Still, of course Nick Timothy isn't shy to put his name to this complete rubbish, why would he be? A reminder that Timothy 'masterminded' Theresa May's election campaign Go Home vans...
Also unsurprising is Patel's response. Determined as ever to press on with her new Bill, which aims to further criminalise asylum seekers, dramatically increase sentences & crucially,
STILL not do anything that the criminal gangs of smugglers in France wouldn't want her to do.
I'll end it here, just with another reminder that Priti Patel is the smugglers' most helpful ally.
As long as our borders are closed and deadly, they can extort and exploit people who need passage. This will not stop until we offer people another way. theguardian.com/global-developβ¦
Thank you to the Times editors for correcting its description of JCWI. We are (of course) a politically neutral organisation and have simply pushed for the CPS guidance to reflect the existing law of this country for the protection of fundamental human rights. π #smallwins
Today is deadline day for EU citizens to apply to stay in their homes in the UK.
An incredible self-inflicted disaster. Starting tomorrow & over the next years, tens or even hundreds of thousands more people are going to lose rights & be forced into the hands of criminals.
Those people's landlords, employers and GPs are going to become gatekeepers for what essential services they can access.
We've already seen people wrongful turned away, there will be many, many more.
IPPR has found out over 100,000 of our EU citizen neighbours are still waiting in limbo. This settled status system was never going to work.
Add to that the Home Office's track record of incompetence and cruelty and this is a disaster waiting to happen.
Simply no justification whatsoever based on the idea of "safe first country" to send people to Rwanda.
Makes a complete mockery of their own flawed logic.
That was well explained by a @UNHCRUK rep on #r4today just now - UN being unusually vocal in its criticism of Patel's plans.
To be absolutely clear, though, this is not going to happen. This country won't stand for it and, frankly, nor will the likes of Rwanda. Patel and Johnson have misread the public again if they think there is widespread support for this level of abject, insensate cruelty #r4today
These are pathetic, re-hashed-from-the-90s, failed approaches of the past that our clueless Home Secretary will lay before Parliament in her new Bill come this week or next.
We must demand MPs throw them out with the contempt they deserve & introduce a real new approach #r4today
A world where the UK and Denmark are trying to palm off their responsibilities to refugees onto Rwanda... there's something wrong with this picture π€¦ββοΈ
Reading this now I just feel like crying. But there will be no crying. Only fighting back.
And there'll be no God forsaken refugee processing hub in Rwanda for fuck's sake.
They couldn't do offshore processing when they threatened to in the 90s, nor the 00s. And just cos zoomers are wearing low rise bootcut jeans now it's no bloody excuse to try it over again.
I'm hearing on #r4today that working class white kids have poor educational outcomes because of "the concept of white privelege" & not a series of Tory govts over 11 years that have alienated teachers' unions, cut youth services to the bone & torn up the benefits system ππ
So. That's a relief.
Asked what data supports claim that it is "white privelege" holding poor white kids back, we hear that Robert Halford is Jewish, actually. Fascinating.
Pushed on whether this is actually relevant he complains, I kid you not, about "pitching one group against another" π€¦ββοΈ #r4today
Anyone who thinks that the brain drain is a thing to be solved by trapping people in places without opportunities (or, in some cases safety), but isn't going to wall off London from immigrants from Blackpool can suck my dick.
Either everybody, not just brown people, stays put in the box they were born in and make the bloody best of it regardless... or we value people more highly than we do places, in which case, genuinely, stfu.
It's possible ofc, that this government really is aiming to achieve what the governments of the 80s were not QUITE racist enough to fully implement:
A free movement area with the "old" (white) colonies.
I highly doubt it, but no doubt some will characterise it as such either way.
More likely imho is an increase in limited legal migration pathways. I've banged on about the India deal here, explaining why a few thousand time-limited visas is likely, if anything, to *increase* the number of people who end up living here without papers