Tweet

Bar & Bench

13 Jul, 13 tweets, 8 min read

@NIA_India

#BombayHighCourt to hear the petitions filed by #BhimaKoregaon accused Rona Wilson and Shoma Sen seeking quashing of the chargesheet against them, alleging fraudulent evidence gathered by NIA.

Hearing before Justices SS Shinde and NJ Jamadar.

#ElgarParishad

@NIA_India

Hearing begins.

Sr Adv Indira Jaising: This is a set of two petitions. State has also filed the affidavit. I am ready to go on with the matter.

#BombayHighCourt #ElgarParishad

ASG Anil Singh: Just 5 minutes back, I have received 2 compilations. 700 pages and 160 pages.

Jaising: There is nothing new in the record. These are judgments of Supreme Court for the benefit of the court.
Another compilation is proceedings of trial court.

#BombayHighCourt

Jaising: Those proceedings are nothing new. It is their documents.

Court: We do not have those documents. If you want the Court to not read, while you go ahead with the matter.

#BombayHighCourt #ElgarParishad

Jaising requests for physical hearing of the case as it will be easier to assist the court.

#BombayHighCourt #ElgarParishad

Court: We will hear the matter on Monday 2.30 but not coming Monday.
And exchange the pleadings before the hearing so there shouldn’t be an excuse that documents are not received.

#BombayHighCourt #ElgarParishad

Jaising: Direct the state to file their reply in Shoma Sen’s petition. On the next hearing they will seek for time to file reply. The time for filing reply has long gone.

#BombayHighCourt #ElgarParishad

Court: We will say all pleadings to be completed by July 22, 2021?

#BombayHighCourt #ElgarParishad

Order: Satyanarayanan, advocate for petitioner has sent compilation of documents and also copies of the judgments.
The compilation of documents is taken on record. Compilation of judgments, the petitioners can refer those during course of hearing.

#BombayHighCourt #ElgarParishad

Order: Compilations to be served.

Court: What about affidavit in reply?

Order: Reply if any to be filed by July 23, 2021.
List the matter for physical hearing on July 26, 2021 subject to approval by the Chief Justice.

#BombayHighCourt #ElgarParishad

Court: How long will you take?

Jaising: We will need time. If not the rest of the day, another day, between the two of us.

Court: Very difficult question I asked you.

#BombayHighCourt #ElgarParishad

Jaising: We have to make submissions on the maintainability of the petition. It will take some time to persuade the court.

#BombayHighCourt #ElgarParishad

Hearing ends.

#BombayHighCourt #ElgarParishad

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @barandbench

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

14 Jul

Chief Justice of India NV Ramana led bench of Supreme Court to hear a plea by Major General S.G. Vombatkere challenging the constitutionality of Section 124A IPC which penalises for the offence of #Sedition

#supremecourt

Adv PB Suresh: We are challenging the constitutional validity of Section 124A

#SupremeCourt #Sedition

CJI: We will list it tomorrow then? (cannot see the video of the lawyer appearing)

#SupremeCourt #Sedition

Read 5 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

14 Jul

[Dawoodi Bohra suit hearing]

Justice GS Patel of #BombayHighCourt: I am not stopping any fair reporting of these proceedings, nor will I ever stop. Neither are the petitioners seeking that. I have a problem with the editorial comment on the cross examination and the commentary.

@UdaipurTimes

Justice Patel had called upon the Plaintiff and online publication Udaipur Times to explain how access to trial records pertinent to the case was made available to the media.

@UdaipurTimes

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

The defendant in the case had filed an interim applicant raising grievance that the plaintiff in the case was giving access of the pertinent trial records in an ongoing trial through social media.

#BombayHighCourt

Read 5 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

14 Jul

#BombayHighCourt to hear the PIL seeking directions to make use of A4 size paper printed on both sides mandatory for filing all pleadings in the High Court and subordinate courts in Maharashtra.

Hearing before Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni.

@ajinkyaudaneadv

Read details of the petition filed by Mumbai lawyer Ajinkya Udane @ajinkyaudaneadv

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

Hearing begins.

Adv SR Nargolkar for the HC administration submits that a notification amending the OS and AS Rules of High Court has been issued and the grievance stands redressed.

A4 size paper permitted to be used for filing and for internal work.

#BombayHighCourt

Read 5 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

14 Jul

Supreme Court to shortly hear the appeal of Uttar Pradesh govt against Allahabad HC’s order wherein it had passed directions in its suo motu COVID case for improving the medical facilities. A vacation bench had earlier stayed the order.
#supremecourt #suomotu #covid19

hearing begins

Matter has been passed over as SG Tushar Mehta is in another court

#supremecourt

Read 4 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

14 Jul

TRIBUNAL REFORMS ORDINANCE: JUDGMENT

#SupremeCourt to shortly deliver verdict on a plea by Madras Bar Association challenging Sections 12, 13 of the Tribunal Reforms Ordinance, 2021 and Sections 184 and 186(2) of the Finance Act, 2017 as amended by the Ordinance

#tribunals

One of the moot point of the hearing was whether the retrospective effect given to Section 184(11) of Finance Act would override the judgments of the Supreme Court.
#supremecourt #tribunalordinance

Madras Bar Association had argued that challenged provisions are in "contravention of principles of separation of powers, independence of the judiciary (both being part of the basic structure of our Constitution), and are against efficient and effective administration of justice"

Read 8 tweets

Bar & Bench

@barandbench

13 Jul

@KaruNagarajan1

#BREAKING: Madras High Court dismisses plea by State General Secretary of the BJP Karu Nagarajan against Tamil Nadu govt’s constitution of a nine-member panel to study the impact of #NEET on socially and economically backward students.

#MadrasHighCourt @KaruNagarajan1

#MadrasHighCourt ORDER: Setting up of the commission does not amount to subverting any process of (medical) admission, far less an act of defiance to any order passed by #SupremeCourt or even remotest challenge to the authority of the Union. #NEET

#MadrasHighCourt ORDER: The setting up of the commission can by no stretch of imagination be seen to be contrary to any Supreme Court order, whether letter or spirit or as a counter to any legislative action taken by the Union or process put in place. #NEET

Read 6 tweets

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!