A number of you have asked how to hedge, so here is a thread....
Hedging allows one to stay long (participate in the upside) during uptrends, but it makes the portfolio "market neutral" during downtrends.
Hedging isn't fool proof and doesn't work...
...perfectly all the time. On some days, the portfolio goes up a little and on other days, it goes down a little (usually less than 50bps) *but* hedging does help in avoiding big drawdowns during stock market turbulence.
Hedging is akin to "fire insurance", it usually costs...
...in terms of some missed upside when the market quickly reverses higher but it pays off big time when there is a major stock market decline or crash.
In those instances, profits from the hedges can be invested in stocks (when they are severely beaten down) and this really...
...helps with juicing one's returns.
I hedge my portfolio 100% which means if my stock exposure is $100, then I sell short ARK ETFs so am also short $100 exposure (therefore market neutral).
Example - if ARKK is trading at $10 and I want to hedge $100 worth of long exposure...
....then I'd sell short 10 units of ARKK ($100 / $10 = 10).
If one has a margin account with any online broker, then cash isn't required to put on the hedge. The broker uses the stock portfolio as collateral and when one shorts, cash is deposited into the account.
In terms...
...of timing, I use a medium-term exponential moving average as my "trend filter". In simple terms, this means that as long as price is above this level, I do *not* hedge.
In addition to this trend filter, I also use two shorter-term exponential moving averages (5/7)...
...which generate my trading signals.
So, if price is below my trend filter and 5ema is also below 7ema, I put on my hedge. When 5ema closes above 7ema *or* if price goes back above my trend filter, I cover my short and close my hedge.
One doesn't have to use these...
....exponential moving averages, as long as an investor/trader uses one medium-term exponential moving average as his/her "trend filter" and two shorter-term ones to generate trading signals, it'll do the job.
Most of my hedging signals produce losses (missed upside) and...
...only ~35% hedges hand out profits *but* over several years, the hedges tend to pay for themselves and if you take into account the re-investment in stocks (with hedging profits) after big declines, then I'd say this strategy becomes profitable - which is very good...
...considering hedging is an insurance policy. Normally, one has to pay for insurance...
Should you do it?
This is a personal decision which only you can answer. Personally, I do it because it reduces my drawdowns and stress during market turbulence; and allows me to sleep...
...well at night. Hedging also improves portfolio CAGR because lower drawdowns mean the portfolio doesn't have to do too much work to get back to its high-water mark.
Finally, I hedge off ARK ETFs because they are most correlated to my stocks but if one's portfolio..
...is comprised of different types of stocks, he/she should hedge off those ETFs or futures which are more correlated to his/her holdings.
Thats about it, hedging is "fire insurance" and removes stress - and over time, doesn't cost an arm and a leg.
Hope this is helpful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When I post trades in real-time, trolls claim I'm pumping my book. When I don't post trades in real-time, the same people claim I'm faking trades with the benefit of hindsight.
Since so many have asked, on Tuesday I've sold my $UPST shares.
$UPST has guided for triple digit revenue growth this year but the growth estimates are pretty weak from '22 onwards. Company's valuation is pretty rich given the business slowdown on the horizon.
After thinking about this business for months, there are too many question...
....marks for my taste. Put simply, I just don't see a durable competitive advantage, a genuine secret sauce.
This is why, I've booked a tidy profit and moved on. I may be wrong, the business might turn out to be a big winner but this one isn't for me. "Too tough" pile.
Trimming or permanently selling out of winners for no good reason is a terrible idea!
The big returns are generated by holding, not by selling.
By "taking" a 20% or 30% of 40% profit, one misses out on 200% or 300% or 400% gains.
If you sell, you can no longer benefit from those stocks.
Very few companies compound like crazy, best to hold onto them for as long as possible.
IMHO, the reasons when a great stock should be sold -
- Business matures (can't grow)
- Management changes or deteriorates
- The business outlook deteriorates (competition)
- Cash is needed for a younger compounder
- Stock triples/quadruples within months
Discovered today that a few anonymous haters (one of whom is a convicted felon - he was imprisoned for defrauding investors out of hundreds of millions) published my "career history" a few weeks ago to smear my reputation.
Their biased summary is an attempt to rewrite history.
Some facts -
I was a Founding Director/major shareholder (one of three business partners) of my first investment management firm which was founded in 2001 (when I was 24 years old).
After discovering questionable conduct, I immediately resigned from that firm, sold...
...my shares and founded my own boutique investment management firm in 2005 which managed capital for companie, family offices and high net worth individuals.
I ran my firm until 2016, which is when I retired from the business and my company was acquired by a Hong Kong...
If a business has a super bright future, usually pays to buy shares for the long haul.
Many keep waiting for big pullbacks and miss out on life changing returns.
Few % here or there makes no difference if stock goes up 100s of % over several years.
In my 20+ year career as an investor, I've lost out on most money by NOT buying into super high-quality businesses because their valuations seemed "too high".
Those stocks ended up rallying 100s of % and well, the cheap stuff usually underperformed. Strange but true.
Fortunately, I've learnt from the school of hard knocks ---
May was a tough month for growth companies as most related stocks came under the pump before stabilising.
Fortunately, my trend following indicators got me hedged in time and my portfolio remained market-neutral during most of the month which is reflected...