New report from @NAOorguk out today on Local Authorities and #NetZero, with some interesting findings, particularly on funding streams. A thread π
First, a few stats. Fully 91% of 333 authorities have now set some form of #NetZero target.
And 20-21 saw grant funding levels jump to Β£1.2B from just Β£74m in 19-20 -- though fragmented across 21 separate grant schemes. (2/n)
Lack of coordination is a theme:
β no overall expectations from central govt on local authority role in meeting Net Zero
β no clear set of responsibilities or view of how govt will work together
β no clear central goverment lead
β‘οΈ first 2 recommendations focus on this (3/n):
On funding π·
β Neither MHCLG nor Treasury has assessed the totality that
central govt provides to local govt linked with net zero
β "The nature of grant funding can hinder value for money" due to short-termism & unequal distribution (as bigger LAs can bid more easily) (4/n)
And a key one to for officials to think about over the next few months as we go in to the Comprehensive Spending Review: (5/n)
Next up, #planning! π‘ππ£
βa critical opportunity in current planning reforms to make these #NetZero consistent (see @theCCCuk recommended Net Zero Test for how you might do this)
β‘οΈ a recommendation (6/n)
Also, recognition where recognition due - along with the big increase in grant funds, there have been some signs of progress, including a new X-govt working group, dedicated support in some areas... (7/n)
And new directions in funding, which could really help:
β new lending from UK Infrastructure Bank of up to Β£4B from summer 2021
β encouragement to use levelling up and other economic growth funding to meet Net Zero (8/n)
Other recommendations to note on improving consistency of reporting to make it easier to track progress (yes please! ππΌββοΈ) + joint work on skills + sharing best practice. (9/n)
At @theCCCuk we are doing work over the coming months on how government organises itself and makes decisions -- the delivery challenge and the role of loval delivery in this.
My quick THREAD π on a few developments in buildings which you might have missed, but which *could* be transformational.
Covering #PAS2035, a few gems from the #GreenFinanceStrategy and the forthcoming electrification demonstrator... (1/8)
1. Last week's Govt Green Finance Strategy contains some stuff which would have been in the 2018 Energy Efficiency Action Plan. BEIS & HMT commit to consult on measures to get mortgage lenders to disclose the *average performance* across their portfolio -cf πfleet average (2/8)
This could pave the way for future regulation, building on the v successful NABERS model pioneered in Melbourne commercial offices &covered in @theCCCuk 2016 Heat report (supported by #Betterbuildingspartnership in the UK) (3/8) bit.ly/2ejusW9 bit.ly/2XUOnkK
π£π£ 2 common misconceptions in (fairly decent) coverage of our #housing report. 1. We are only talking about NEW homes not connecting to gas grid. This is technology-neutral 2. Heat pumps do not cost 25k. That's a cost of retrofitting to EPC A / zero carbon homes spec... (1/5)
... which as we state, in practice you'd probably just not do. It's a thought experiment to show the benefit of designing more efficient ultra-low energy bill homes from the start for ~5k. A one time opportunity not to miss. (2/5)
For existing homes, we call for a heat strategy within 3 years which deploys low- and no-regret options and develops key options for remaining gas heated buildings (3/5)