ONE DOESN'T HAVE to be trained in linguistic text analysis to be able to see any anomalies indicative of deception.
THIS LETTER contains a number of (glaring) anomalies.
AS A FORMER @rcmpgrcpolice (Ret'd), I received specialized training in forensic interviewing.
@ps752justice
THIS LETTER contains a number of (glaring) anomalies.
AS A FORMER @rcmpgrcpolice (Ret'd), I received specialized training in forensic interviewing.
@ps752justice
2/16
FIRST PARAGRAPH of PAGE 2
First of the anomalies is actually a 'Biggie'
HERE @CommrRCMPGRC purports to answer a specific (but carefully-crafted and unasked) question. [Yellow]
LIKE THOSE fabricating a story,the Commissioner's (supposed) answer is simple and brief.[Green]
FIRST PARAGRAPH of PAGE 2
First of the anomalies is actually a 'Biggie'
HERE @CommrRCMPGRC purports to answer a specific (but carefully-crafted and unasked) question. [Yellow]
LIKE THOSE fabricating a story,the Commissioner's (supposed) answer is simple and brief.[Green]
3/16
LIKE ANY DECEPTIVE PERSON, she is minimizing the risk of exposure. Essentially, the fewer the facts that might be proved false, the better.
IN FACT, it doesn't answer the only question of any importance at this juncture, what I'll refer to as the 'actual' question, namely:
LIKE ANY DECEPTIVE PERSON, she is minimizing the risk of exposure. Essentially, the fewer the facts that might be proved false, the better.
IN FACT, it doesn't answer the only question of any importance at this juncture, what I'll refer to as the 'actual' question, namely:
4/16
🔳 « WHETHER THE DECISION to ❮NOT❯ open a domestic Canadian criminal investigation was ❮ACTUALLY❯ made by @CommrRCMPGRC @rcmpgrcpolice, OR if she (the Force) was acting under (other) direction? »
IN FACT, it flies in the face of provisions of Criminal Code, for example:
🔳 « WHETHER THE DECISION to ❮NOT❯ open a domestic Canadian criminal investigation was ❮ACTUALLY❯ made by @CommrRCMPGRC @rcmpgrcpolice, OR if she (the Force) was acting under (other) direction? »
IN FACT, it flies in the face of provisions of Criminal Code, for example:
5/16
INSTEAD, THE QUESTION Commissioner chooses to answer is set up, intended for her to state a safe known fact related to general jurisdiction, and having no bearing beyond a simple statement of fact.
HER ('SOI-DISANT') RESPONSE merely answers what is known and not in dispute.
INSTEAD, THE QUESTION Commissioner chooses to answer is set up, intended for her to state a safe known fact related to general jurisdiction, and having no bearing beyond a simple statement of fact.
HER ('SOI-DISANT') RESPONSE merely answers what is known and not in dispute.
6/16
WHAT IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWS can best be described as extraneous and adds little, if any, real value. [Purple]
THIS IS FOLLOWED with a lengthy 'misdirection' (a form of deception) intended to draw the attention of the families to Ukraine and away from the question. [Blue]
WHAT IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWS can best be described as extraneous and adds little, if any, real value. [Purple]
THIS IS FOLLOWED with a lengthy 'misdirection' (a form of deception) intended to draw the attention of the families to Ukraine and away from the question. [Blue]
7/16
The narrative balance of Ukraine portion is significantly longer than the preceding portions and the imbalance of its proportional weight (relative to what precedes) indicates a serious effort is being made to have families focus on this aspect and away from the question.
The narrative balance of Ukraine portion is significantly longer than the preceding portions and the imbalance of its proportional weight (relative to what precedes) indicates a serious effort is being made to have families focus on this aspect and away from the question.
8/16
THE PIVOT, while it precedes the Ukraine portion, is meant to facilitate the misdirection and like a shell game, the attention of the families is being drawn away from the pea (actual question).
WHILE the preceding portion contains extraneous and arguably, befogging detail
THE PIVOT, while it precedes the Ukraine portion, is meant to facilitate the misdirection and like a shell game, the attention of the families is being drawn away from the pea (actual question).
WHILE the preceding portion contains extraneous and arguably, befogging detail
9/16
it also contains two references to 'other influences', which are not specified.
EVEN LIARS prefer not to lie. Outright lies carry the risk of detection. The bigger the lie, the greater the enormity of the perceived risk of exposure. Even 'clever' people cannot completely
it also contains two references to 'other influences', which are not specified.
EVEN LIARS prefer not to lie. Outright lies carry the risk of detection. The bigger the lie, the greater the enormity of the perceived risk of exposure. Even 'clever' people cannot completely
10/16
conceal their deception.
THE INCLUSION of "other advisors" and "consider related issues" in juxtaposition (and perfectly alligned syntax) is significant. It is not unlike the arsonist who remains/returns to watch the fire he/she has set.
conceal their deception.
THE INCLUSION of "other advisors" and "consider related issues" in juxtaposition (and perfectly alligned syntax) is significant. It is not unlike the arsonist who remains/returns to watch the fire he/she has set.
11/16
IN CLOSING - AND IN MY OPINION - with this letter @Commissioner has opted for an elaborate shell game in an attempt to mislead (deceive) the families. She gives the appearance of addressing the question, but sidesteps it entirely. The pea, the actual question (Frame 4)
IN CLOSING - AND IN MY OPINION - with this letter @Commissioner has opted for an elaborate shell game in an attempt to mislead (deceive) the families. She gives the appearance of addressing the question, but sidesteps it entirely. The pea, the actual question (Frame 4)
12/16
is not to be found under any of these figurative YELLOW PURPLE BLUE 🟨🟪🟦 SHELLS.
IN MY OPINION, the 'other influences' are the telltale fingerprints of someone « OTHER THAN » the Commissioner on this decision.
IF CORRECT, the Commissioner has been rendered to a
is not to be found under any of these figurative YELLOW PURPLE BLUE 🟨🟪🟦 SHELLS.
IN MY OPINION, the 'other influences' are the telltale fingerprints of someone « OTHER THAN » the Commissioner on this decision.
IF CORRECT, the Commissioner has been rendered to a
13/16
signature and that for presentability only.
THIS RAISES THE QUESTION: WHO are the other unnamed 'advisors' and WHAT are the 'other related issues' that they are included but remain veiled.
signature and that for presentability only.
THIS RAISES THE QUESTION: WHO are the other unnamed 'advisors' and WHAT are the 'other related issues' that they are included but remain veiled.
14/16
LET NONE OF US FORGET that 55 Canadian citizens, members of our Canadian family, were murdered aboard Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752.
FOR REASONS NOT KNOWN, this government is prepared to walk away from pursuing real justice for the victims and their families.
LET NONE OF US FORGET that 55 Canadian citizens, members of our Canadian family, were murdered aboard Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752.
FOR REASONS NOT KNOWN, this government is prepared to walk away from pursuing real justice for the victims and their families.
16/16
@JavadSoleimani8 @Daniel_Ghods @kourosh1959 @esmaeilion @SalmanSima @Ardeshirz @NahidGhani @NahayatT @CBCNews @rcmpgrcpolice
#ps752justice #PS752 #ps752atrocity #CrimesAgainstHumanity #terrorism #cdnpoli
#مایا_زیبایی
#هواپیمای_اوکراینی
@JavadSoleimani8 @Daniel_Ghods @kourosh1959 @esmaeilion @SalmanSima @Ardeshirz @NahidGhani @NahayatT @CBCNews @rcmpgrcpolice
#ps752justice #PS752 #ps752atrocity #CrimesAgainstHumanity #terrorism #cdnpoli
#مایا_زیبایی
#هواپیمای_اوکراینی
@threadreaderapp please unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
