Data-driven design is a lot like offline RL. Want to design a drug molecule, protein, or robot? Offline model-based optimization (MBO) tackles this, and our new algorithm, conservative objective models (COMs) provides a simple approach: arxiv.org/abs/2107.06882

A thread:
The basic setup: say you have prior experimental data D={(x,y)} (e.g., drugs you've tested). How to use it to get the best drug? Well, you could train a neural net f(x) = y, then pick the best x. This is a *very* bad idea, because you'll just get an adversarial example!
This is very important: lots of recent work shows how to train really good predictive models in biology, chemistry, etc. (e.g., AlphaFold), but using these for design runs into this adversarial example problem. This is actually very similar to problems we see in offline RL!
Just like in offline RL, the problem is distributional shift: the new designs we want to evaluate might be out of distribution for our training data. So we can borrow some ideas from conservative Q-learning (CQL) to "robustify" our models, thus making them suitable for design.
Our method, conservative objective models (COMs), is very similar to adversarial training: just find "adversarial" designs that the model thinks are good, and make them look bad, while making the designs in the data look good to counterbalance this.
Just like CQL, we can guarantee that for a suitable regularizer weight, COMs gets us a lower bound on the true value of a design, providing a principled solution. It's also simple to use and implement.

Website: sites.google.com/berkeley.edu/c…
ICML talk:
Great collaboration w/ Brandon Trabucco, @aviral_kumar2, @YoungGeng. For more offline MBO papers, also check out these from our lab:
arxiv.org/abs/1912.13464
arxiv.org/abs/2102.07970

And these great papers from @jlistgarten's group:
arxiv.org/abs/1901.10060
arxiv.org/abs/2006.08052
We'll be presenting COMs at #ICML2021:

Thu Jul 22, 6:40am-6:45am PT
icml.cc/virtual/2021/s…

Poster: Thu Jul 22, 6am - 8 am PT

Or just watch the talk in advance here:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sergey Levine

Sergey Levine Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @svlevine

18 Jul
Since many people were interested in our recent offline MBO work, I'll also write about a recent paper on MBO by Justin Fu, which trains forward models for each possible objective value and uses them to compute a posterior via NML: arxiv.org/abs/2102.07970

A thread:
The basic idea, unlike COMs (which learn pessimistic models) is to get a posterior over values for a new design x. Justin's method (NEMO) trains a separate model *for every possible value y* for the design x (discretized), and uses the likelihood from these to get the posterior. Image
This corresponds to the normalized maximum likelihood (NML) distribution, which has appealing regret guarantees, which we extend in NEMO to provide regret guarantees on offline MBO as well! This is more complex than COMs, but potentially more powerful as we get a full posterior.
Read 4 tweets
14 Jul
Empirical studies observed that generalization in RL is hard. Why? In a new paper, we provide a partial answer: generalization in RL induces partial observability, even for fully observed MDPs! This makes standard RL methods suboptimal.
arxiv.org/abs/2107.06277

A thread:
Take a look at this example: the agent has a multi-step "guessing game" to label an image (not a bandit -- you get multiple guesses until you get it right!). We know in MDPs there is an optimal deterministic policy, so RL will learn a deterministic policy here. Image
Of course, this is a bad idea -- if it guesses wrong on the first try, it should not guess the same label again. But this task *is* fully observed -- there is a unique mapping from image pixels to labels, the problem is that we just don't know what it is from training data!
Read 9 tweets
8 Feb
What did we learn from 5 years of robotic deep RL? My colleagues at Google and I tried to distill our experience into a review-style journal paper, covering some of the practical aspects of real-world robotic deep RL:
arxiv.org/abs/2102.02915

🧵->
This is somewhat different from the usual survey/technical paper: we are not so much trying to provide the technical foundations of robotic deep RL, but rather describe the practical lessons -- the stuff one doesn't usually put in papers.
It's also a little bit out of date at this point (it's a journal paper, which took nearly a year to clear review, despite having very few revisions... but that's life I suppose). But we hope it will be pretty valuable to the community.
Read 5 tweets
18 Dec 20
RL enables robots to navigate real-world environments, with diverse visually indicated goals: sites.google.com/view/ving-robo…

w/ @_prieuredesion, B. Eysenbach, G. Kahn, @nick_rhinehart

paper: arxiv.org/abs/2012.09812
video:

Thread below ->
The idea: use RL + graph search to learn to reach visually indicated goals, using offline data. Starting with data in an environment (which in our case was previously collected for another project, BADGR), train a distance function and policy for visually indicated goals.

2/n
Once we have a distance function, policy, and graph, we search the graph to find a path for new visually indicated goals (images), and then execute the policy for the nearest node. A few careful design decisions (in the paper) make this work much better than prior work.

3/n
Read 6 tweets
11 Dec 20
My favorite part of @NeurIPSConf is the workshops, a chance to see new ideas and late-breaking work. Our lab will present a number of papers & talks at workshops:

thread below ->

meanwhile here is a teaser image :)
At robot learning workshop, @katie_kang_ will present the best-paper-winning (congrats!!) “Multi-Robot Deep Reinforcement Learning via Hierarchically Integrated Models”: how to share modules between multiple real robots; recording here: (16:45pm PT 12/11)
At the deep RL workshop, Ben Eysenbach will talk about how MaxEnt RL is provably robust to certain types of perturbations. Contributed talk at 14:00pm PT 12/11.
Paper: drive.google.com/file/d/1fENhHp…
Talk: slideslive.com/38941344/maxen…
Read 19 tweets
10 Dec 20
Tonight 12/10 9pm PT, Aviral Kumar will present Model Inversion Networks (MINs) at @NeurIPSConf. Offline model-based optimization (MBO) that uses data to optimize images, controllers and even protein sequences!

paper: tinyurl.com/mins-paper
pres: neurips.cc/virtual/2020/p…

more->
The problem setting: given samples (x,y) where x represents some input (e.g., protein sequence, image of a face, controller parameters) and y is some metric (e.g., how well x does at some task), find a new x* with the best y *without access to the true function*.
Classically, model-based optimization methods would learn some proxy function (acquisition function) fhat(x) = y, and then solve x* = argmax_x fhat(x), but this can result in OOD inputs to fhat(x) when x is very high dimensional.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(