Professor of cultural studies and poet Yevheniia #Bilchenko was dismissed from Drahomaniv University in Kiev after a hate campaign instigated by ex-Nazi blogger #Sternenko for Bilchenko's dissenting views and speaking against removing Russian from Ukrainian public sphere.
The university disbanded Bilchenko's whole department in fact. She is offered a vacant position, but she believes it's a sheer formality. This happened thanks to the defense and support of Sternenko by U. civil society despite charges with heavy crimes like murder and kidnapping.
Right now, Sternenko leads similar campaigns against at least three other lecturers with dissenting views. A teacher of physics has been dismissed in just a few days from a school in Ternopil region after Sternenko published a poor record of him allegedly denying Ru. army in Ukr.
Sternenko accuses them of "Ukrainophobia" and "collaboration". His style is presenting "self-evident" facts of dissent from the nationalist interpretation of the events by the people working in public education and "poisoning" the students. There is no appeal to any legal norms.
The Ministry of Education does not join the calls to dismiss the lecturers like it actively did under the previous ministers Kvit and Hrynevych. However, it is not intervening to defend the lecturers either.
A deescalating position of the Ministry during the peak of the bullying campaign against Bilchenko has not protected her. Sternenko attacks the current minister Shkarlet for his pro-Yanukovych position before Maidan and blames Zelenskyi for suggesting him to the office.
Bilchenko got health issues. If you would like to help her, here are the account details: facebook.com/yevzhik/posts/…
This is exactly what coup plotters usually do: openly boast about their plans on TV well in advance. In fact, whether Zelenskyi would stay in the office till the end of his cadence has been discussed widely from the moment Z. was elected. First, by the nationalist opposition.
By Poroshenko "25%" supporters, by the "anti-capitulation" campaign who openly called for violent revolt in case Z. would proceed with Minsk accords. "Vova (meaning Z.), go to Rostov (the city Yanukovych escaped in 2014 to)". There were public violent threats to Z. himself.
Zelenskyi's office was assaulted by an ex-Nazi criminal-turned into a nationalist influencer and hate-monger Sternenko's supporters from a broad coalition of far-right and NGO "liberals". Nobody was seriously punished for anything of the above.
Some theory-driven and comparative thoughts on violence, geography, and political regime in #Kazakhstan uprising. There is no actual "youth bulge", it's not from the peripheries to the capital, the "authoritarian modernization" is overrated.
The Kazakhstan uprising very quickly escalated to violence in comparison with most other post-Soviet revolutions. The younger is the population, the likelier is political violence in the country. The median age in Kazakhstan - 32. In Russia, Ukraine, Belarus: 40-41.
But Kazakhstan is younger because of the kids under 14, not because of the "youth bulge" of 15-24 - a large number of frustrated youth of the "combat age" without jobs and career prospects fitting their ambitions - one of the key factors in revolutions and violent uprisings.
The highest popularity of pro-Soviet attitudes in the history of Levada-Center surveys in Russia has no relation at all to the popularity of left identity.
In August, 49% supported "the Soviet system as it was before the 90s", 18% - "the current system", 19% - "Western-style democracy".
Besides, 62% supported the economic system based on state plan and distribution, while only 24% supported the system based on private property and market relations.
Yeah, #Azov is like deliberately making fun of those propaganda "experts" who want us to believe "Azov is a regular unit of the National Guard" and "even if #Protasevich served in Azov, so what?"
Is "Kim", the Belarusian volunteer in #Azov, expressed far-right views in the interview for Radio Svoboda? Not touching whether he and #Protasevich are the same person, there are pros and cons. But, yes, his views are far-right.
He responds to a very generic question about his and other Belarusians' in "Pahonia" squad political views. First thing, he says we are all nationalists. Then he prefers limited democracy. Then about gays, then about migration, then about democracy without "some absurdities".
I think a proper stance on #Protasevich should accept the following: 1) Whataboutism is wrong. 2) He must be released, even though he is a propagandist, his Telegram Nexta provoked hate and violence, and he apparently spent some time with the far-right Ukrainian regiment Azov.
3) Ban on flights and sanctions beyond personal hurt primarily Belarusian (and Ukrainian) people, not Lukashenka.