The highest popularity of pro-Soviet attitudes in the history of Levada-Center surveys in Russia has no relation at all to the popularity of left identity. Image
In August, 49% supported "the Soviet system as it was before the 90s", 18% - "the current system", 19% - "Western-style democracy". Image
Besides, 62% supported the economic system based on state plan and distribution, while only 24% supported the system based on private property and market relations. Image
However, in September, only 18% responded positively to whether they can be called supporters of left, socialist views. There is a clear age correlation but even the majority of the Communist voters do not identify themselves as such (only 40%). Image
For comparison, significantly more (32%) called themselves supporters of market economic reforms. Image
On the one hand, it's a problem of disconnection of the left identity from its organic base. On the other hand, if the rise of pro-Soviet attitudes reflects the protest against Putin's regime, it has only a weak left dimension.
Need to argue against a possible interpretation of these data. The fact that pro-Soviet people do not feel themselves on the left does not yet mean that they feel themselves on the right.
Soviet was a concrete experience of modernization that has not been outpassed by anything that followed. This is a very material basis of the pro-Soviet feelings that are reproduced through generations even by the schoolkids born in the 2000s.
"Left, socialist" is just an abstract ideological thing for most of the post-Soviet people. The data reflect the weakness of all ideologies in post-Soviet societies, rather than the weakness of just left ideology. I've just written about this here
laender-analysen.de/ukraine-analys…
The political lesson to be taken from these data is that one needs to bridge "pro-Soviet" and "left" in Russia rather than to cherish an elitist "anti-Soviet" left identity.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Volodymyr Ishchenko

Volodymyr Ishchenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Volod_Ishchenko

29 May
Yeah, #Azov is like deliberately making fun of those propaganda "experts" who want us to believe "Azov is a regular unit of the National Guard" and "even if #Protasevich served in Azov, so what?"
Is "Kim", the Belarusian volunteer in #Azov, expressed far-right views in the interview for Radio Svoboda? Not touching whether he and #Protasevich are the same person, there are pros and cons. But, yes, his views are far-right.
He responds to a very generic question about his and other Belarusians' in "Pahonia" squad political views. First thing, he says we are all nationalists. Then he prefers limited democracy. Then about gays, then about migration, then about democracy without "some absurdities".
Read 5 tweets
26 May
Further evidence that #Protasevich could be not just a journalist in Donbass and could be close not simply to #Azov but to Ukrainian neo-Nazis
A much clearer picture of #Protasevich at the Azov parade in Mariupol in 2015. The account is a bot but here's the original from Azov Vkontakte

Read 8 tweets
25 May
I think a proper stance on #Protasevich should accept the following:
1) Whataboutism is wrong.
2) He must be released, even though he is a propagandist, his Telegram Nexta provoked hate and violence, and he apparently spent some time with the far-right Ukrainian regiment Azov.
3) Ban on flights and sanctions beyond personal hurt primarily Belarusian (and Ukrainian) people, not Lukashenka.
Read 7 tweets
24 May
Although it's really difficult to feel personal sympathies to #Protasevich, not only because he served in Azov but also for the provocative role his Telegram Nexta played in Belarusian protests, I don't think his far-right links have any significance in this case.
Really fun to see a wave of similar comments questioning the confirmation of Protasevich's link to Azov by one of the oldest reputable Ukrainian newspapers.
zn.ua/international/…
The Times:
"In 2014 Protasevich is reported to have travelled to eastern Ukraine, where he joined the Azov Battalion, a far-right group that fought Russian-backed separatists."
thetimes.co.uk/article/hijack…
Read 7 tweets
17 Apr
Some thoughts on the resumed talk that if #Ukraine implements the Minsk accords fully including the political provisions, it may throw the country into a civil war. /Thread
There are some very tentative hopes that Germany and France may start pushing a little bit harder within that "cluster" approach to the Minsk accords to make Ukraine finally implement at least some of the political provisions that they all signed in 2015. /1
This happens after six years of ignoring Ukraine's practical sabotage of the Minsk accords and only after Russia's recent "saber-rattling". I am not even sure that there is anything more than rumors and wishful thinking behind those hopes. /2
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(