The more I think about cryptos, the more I believe it's not "democratizing" finance for anyone.
Rather, it's a social status game for those that have the discretionary income to play around with the "future" of finance.
I'm MOST LIKELY wrong, but a thread on my thoughts ...
1/ Crypto-bros/gals claim that BTC (and others) help democratize finance, giving opp. to those that otherwise couldn't.
Yet today's popular use cases are the antithesis of that movement/goal.
Some examples:
- Trading/Speculation
- Earning "income" from games
- Selling NFTs
2/ The average, middle-to-lower class American doesn't have the time to engage in these activities.
They're working for $USD to pay for rent, food, and child's education.
Most don't have extra cash to buy the "democratizing" currency of the future, let alone gamble it.
3/ I also wonder if anyone *actually* cares about the current use cases outside our small, FinTwit echo-chamber.
Buying ownership in online articles has zero interest to the average American, yet we view that as proof that Crypto/Blockchain is "working to change finance."
4/ Of course, we should distinguish Blockchain tech from cryptocurrency. Blockchain tech will have tremendously positive impacts.
But it won't come in the form of harvesting coins playing online games or selling GIFs to the next Greater Fool.
5/ If we can't find a way to bring the benefits of crypto/blockchain to the masses, $BTC and $ETH will be another play-toy enjoyed by those that have the means to entertain themselves.
To raise their level in the online social status game.
But is that *really* worth it?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ “We can have no finer role model. He was a value investor — a member of that eccentric tribe that believes it’s better to underpay than to overpay.”
This thread reveals the story of the greatest value investor you've never heard of.
The story of Floyd Odlum.
THREAD
2/ With a decent income from his job as a law clerk, Odlum started trading in the stock market. He initially saw the market as a rich, fertile ground for speculative profits. Far from his cemented legacy as a deep value investor.
3/ Yet like most beginning speculators, Odlum too paid his fair share of market tuition.
After losing all his $40,000 starting capital, Odlum retreated from the markets. One newspaper revealed it, “took [Odlum] a while to pay back that sum”.