A Leading Housing Finance Company concentrating on Affordable Housing
Put on your helmets & Enjoy the ride ๐
Retweet for wider reach ๐
1/ Performance Overview
~Annual Revenues exceeded Rs 1000 Cr for the first time
~AUM reached Rs 9454 Cr
~Spread at 5.76% in FY21
~Active Customer base at >1.25 Lacs
2/ 10 Year Report Card
~Developed Niche & maintained disciplined and conservative underwriting
~Scaled the business sustainably
~Promoted financial inclusion & led to the development of the sector
3/ Performing Through COVID-19
Despite the difficult environment, Aavas managed to
~maintain its book strength
~diversify borrowing sources
~leverage tech to enable the smooth running of the business
4/ Enhanced Return for Stakeholders and Improvements in
~Financial Capital
~Company Infrastructure
~Employee Strength
~Business Process & Operations
5/ Strategic Priorities
~Increasing Presence in Market Niche
~Strengthening Customer Engagement
~Building Proprietary Value Chain
~Expanding in Indian housing markets
6/ Strategic Priorities Contd
~Maintaining discipline in managing yields
~Enhancing long term liquidity
~Maximizing Capital Returns
7/ Technological Priorities
~Strengthen tech team and invest in new tech
~Leverage tech and enhance competitiveness
~Ethanol Demand to rise from Govt push for 20% ethanol blending by 2025
~Launched BioPrism tech portfolio for producing bio-based Renewable Materials
~Identified growth areas like Bioplastics, Lignin products, specialty
chemicals, & others
In the year 2010, @vijayshekharโs company One97 Communications, which owns Paytm, was looking to raise just 120 Cr. Valuing the whole company at around 500 Cr.
Fast forward 11 years.
A 370X jump in valuation.
That's the power of ownership of business and equity
Coincidentally, in 2010, India saw its biggest IPO till-date of Coal India
INR 15,200 Cr.
Paytm is all set to break that record this year with its
IPO
One of our investor friends is an ex @PPFAS but does not want his name to appear here.
He made some hard-hitting points to disprove the opinion formed in the above blog post which we believe cannot remain confined in a closed investor group.
So here we go.
~Comparison of PPFAS with NASDAQ 100 for the entire time period is a flawed logic (check image)
~35% allocation is overseas and not NASDAQ.
~allocation to NASDAQ based stocks was very low in the initial period