As @UNESCO decides whether the Great Barrier Reef is world heritage in danger, it’s crucial to understand the history of the failure of Australian politicians to protect the Reef. Weirdly, it all began with a beautiful promise. A thread: #auspol#ForNature
In 1981 the Great Barrier Reef was declared as World Heritage under UNESCO, and Australia promised the world that “to the utmost of its resources” our nation would “do all it can” to protect the Reef: whc.unesco.org/en/conventiont…
It is important to remember that the Fraser Coalition Government chose to nominate the Great Barrier Reef - and the achievement of World Heritage status was something that we were proud of as a nation. Of course we would protect the Reef!
Flash forward three decades to 2012. Despite some significant conservation successes over time, a new report found the Reef had lost half its coral since 1985. Clearly much more effort was needed: pnas.org/content/109/44…
Then in early 2016, the first great bleaching event occurred. Scientists estimated 22% of coral was killed, clearly linking this to climate change and noting the need for urgent action. nature.com/articles/d4158…
Despite this, the Australian government lobbied a few months later to ensure the Reef was omitted from a report on World Heritage sites threatened by climate change. theguardian.com/environment/20…
In early 2017, for the first time in recorded history, the reef suffered back-to-back mass bleaching events. e360.yale.edu/features/insid…
In the middle of this unprecedented heatwave event, it was reported that the Marine Park Authority was forced to scale back surveys due to lack of funding for monitoring. theguardian.com/environment/20…
After these two catastrophic events, in 2018 the Australian government awarded $443 million to a tiny organisation with links to the mining industry without proper due diligence, transparency or tendering - purportedly to ‘protect the Reef’ joshfrydenberg.com.au/latest-news/re…
In early 2019, it was confirmed the Reef had suffered an 89% collapse in new coral after the 2016-17 climate change-induced mass bleaching events. nature.com/articles/s4158…
This was right around the time that Adani’s Carmichael Mine was moving swiftly through approvals despite its potentially huge contribution to climate change: just one of many fossil fuel projects subsidised and championed by the Australian government. theguardian.com/environment/20…
Despite the recorded catastrophic loss of coral life and countless studies on the growing implications of the climate crisis, in May 2019 Scott Morrison claimed his government had ‘saved the Great Barrier Reef.’ theguardian.com/environment/20…
In August 2019, the @gbrmarinepark's outlook report found that Reef health had deteriorated from poor to very poor for the first time. This included clear warnings that urgent national and global action was required to address the climate crisis. abc.net.au/news/2019-08-3…
Just a month later, Scott Morrison addressed the UN saying Australia was ‘doing its bit’ on climate, with a ‘vibrant, resilient and protected reef’ despite having no federal climate policy. theconversation.com/defiant-scott-…
In March 2020, the most widespread bleaching event on record was clearly reported. This was the third mass bleaching in five years, finding severe bleaching across a quarter of the reef attributable to climate change. theconversation.com/we-just-spent-…
In June 2020, experts said the Australian Government had violated its legal obligations to protect the Reef under the World Heritage Convention: theguardian.com/environment/20…
In August 2020, the government’s own GBR envoy urged his fellow MPs to do more on climate change, noting that climate change was having a growing impact on the reef and was unequivocally its greatest long-term threat. environment.gov.au/system/files/r…
In October 2020, a new research report found that corals on the Reef have more than halved over the past 25 years. washingtonpost.com/climate-enviro…
No policy or action taken can truly protect the Reef, and no leader can suggest they are conserving it, without being supported by meaningful climate action. This is the big lie countless Australian politicians have hid behind for years. theguardian.com/sustainable-bu…
A new report this week found Australia has increased its fossil fuel subsidies by 48% since signing the Paris Agreement in 2015. The burning and mining of coal, oil and gas is the biggest contributor to the climate crisis. assets.bbhub.io/professional/s…
Australia’s Reef 2050 Plan, supposedly designed to protect and preserve the GBR, contains no action to reduce emissions which are driving climate change which is the greatest threat to the Reef’s survival. theguardian.com/environment/20…
As long as Australia has no credible target or mechanism for slashing emissions and continues to promote fossil fuels, the substance of the government’s de facto national approach is the destruction of the Reef. crikey.com.au/2012/10/05/why…
Whatever @UNESCO formally decides this week, our #GreatBarrierReef is in mortal danger. If politicians will not do their job, then the people of Australia must step in, to force change, to give our beautiful Reef a fighting chance. #auspol#ForNature
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here’s a business case study for our times. @AGLAustralia is a huge Australian company with a massive problem. AGL is Australia’s worst climate polluter. Investors are recoiling. The share price is tanking. But there is a solution. Here’s a thread: #auspol#ClimateAction
In the mid-2010s, AGL’s CEO Andy Vesey had a plan: AGL would respond to rapidly changing business conditions, by transitioning away from generating electricity from burning dirty coal and would embrace renewable energy.
AGL made a positive start on Vesey’s plan by announcing the closure of the ageing dirty polluting Liddell coal burning power station. But this brought a backlash from the coal lobby and coal-friendly politicians who attacked the move.
Hey @ScottMorrison this week your ministers said they were “stunned” & “blindsided” by UNESCO saying that the #GreatBarrierReef should be listed as in danger. Why? Here's a sample of 15 expert warnings in the last 5 years about the mortal threat to the Reef from #climatechange.
In early 2016, the first of recent mass bleaching events occurred in the Great Barrier Reef. Scientists estimated 22% of coral was killed, clearly linked this to climate change and noted the need for urgent action to counter impacts. nature.com/articles/d4158…
Also in 2016, the UN released a major report on climate change with a key chapter focussing on the Great Barrier Reef. (You might remember that the government intervened prior to its release, objecting that the information would harm tourism). theguardian.com/environment/20…
As a candidate for general secretary of the @OECD Mathias Cormann deserves to be judged on his record. So, for ease of reference, here is a thread setting out some of Mr Cormann’s record of using his position of power to thwart effective action on climate change:
Back in 2009, when the Liberals were in opposition, Mr Cormann opposed any support for a national emissions trading scheme in the absence of a global agreement: abc.net.au/4corners/malco…
In 2011, again from opposition, Mr Cormann claimed to parliament that the Gillard government's “push to put a price on carbon on the basis that it would help reduce global greenhouse gas emissions [was] a very expensive hoax": bit.ly/2MVsIVn
This week at the #NationalPressClub, Australia’s Prime Minister @ScottMorrisonMP outlined his new vision for the nation in the face of catastrophic fires.
Let’s call it the ‘Shonk Doctrine’.
Here’s a thread on the ‘Shonk Doctrine’ and how it works.
Morrison’s Shonk Doctrine combines elements of what @NaomiAKlein called ‘Shock Doctrine’ with a whole lot of our Prime Minister’s characteristic shonkiness.
It is a dangerous combination.
Naomi Klein coined the expression ‘Shock Doctrine’ to describe the phenomenon of vested interests using moments of ‘shock’ (eg wars & disasters) to force through aggressive neoliberal policies targeting ordinary people and the public domain:
1/12. The #Australianfires have been an absolute disaster for wildlife and nature. But there is an important background story: even before the fires, the Coalition government had declared War on Nature.
Here’s a thread:
2/12. The Coalition government’s #WarOnNature has been prosecuted through funding cuts, attempted law changes, support for disastrous projects and attacks on environmental defenders.
Here are 7 examples:
3/12. In December 2013, the newly elected federal Coalition government slashed $10 million in funding from the public-interest Environmental Defenders Offices.