This is wrong.
I hoped the most benign interpretation was that the government was bullying young people. (And that's not very 'benign', is it?) But no, they seem committed to introducing an illiberal ID system that robs you of bodily autonomy.
I hoped the most benign interpretation was that the government was bullying young people. (And that's not very 'benign', is it?) But no, they seem committed to introducing an illiberal ID system that robs you of bodily autonomy.
https://twitter.com/talkRADIO/status/1418168163091558403
And this is despite 9/10 Brits having antibodies already. (ONS.) 88.1% adults had 1st dose vax already and 69.1% 2nd dose. Introducing a passport now is beyond the point of diminishing returns. Where is the cost benefit analysis? The scientific evidence? The impact statement?
If this was a genuinely medical necessity then negative tests would and natural immunity would suffice. The vaccine does not prevent transmission. It reduces severity of symptoms.
The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee inquiry concluded against vaccine passports: committees.parliament.uk/publications/6…
Egregious use of fear and behavioural psychology have softened people up for these draconian measures as I explore in my book A State of Fear.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
