First, recognizing that there are regional differences, more locations saw decreasing trends than increasing trends
Overall, that means less flooding
Second - and this is really important - evidence of decreasing floods are contrary to evidence of increasing precipitation, and specifically maximum precipitation intensities
So YES extreme precip is going up (due to CC), but that does not mean that floods are also!
We actually addressed this apparent paradox more than 20 years ago!
Pielke, R. A., & Downton, M. W. (1999). US trends in streamflow and precipitation: Using societal impact data to address an apparent paradox. Bulletin-American Meteorological Society, 80, 1435-1436.
Back to Do et al
Third, trends in floods do not explain trends in damage
Exposure and vulnerability matter more (of course they do)
Fortunately there is now a large literature from around the world that assesses flood damage in the context of both precip/flood trends and trends in vulnerability exposure doi.org/10.1080/174778…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is no doubt that attribution claims have run far out ahead of detection of trends
"Since 1951, the number of heavy rainfall days per year for the whole of Germany has hardly changed, almost independently of their definition" mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/7…
I'm not sure how the current strong attribution claims (it's obvious, right?) can be reconciled with the observational data, but I'm sure there is an explanation
If certain extreme events have become much more likely, then evidence should show them being more likely? Or not?
My piece in the WSJ today on the importance of climate adaptation
My discussion of Mike Hulme’s “climate reductionism” didn’t survive the edit, but it is a really important piece for understanding the incredible flattening of knowledge on climate
“In this new mood of climate-driven destiny the human hand, as the cause of climate change, has replaced the divine hand of God as being responsible for the collapse of civilizations, for visitations of extreme weather & for determining the new 21st-century wealth of nations”