This is an important paper on flooding globally for several reasons

Do, H. X., Westra, S., & Leonard, M. (2017). A global-scale investigation of trends in annual maximum streamflow. Journal of Hydrology, 552, 28-43.

doi.org/10.1016/j.jhyd…
First, recognizing that there are regional differences, more locations saw decreasing trends than increasing trends

Overall, that means less flooding
Second - and this is really important - evidence of decreasing floods are contrary to evidence of increasing precipitation, and specifically maximum precipitation intensities

So YES extreme precip is going up (due to CC), but that does not mean that floods are also!
We actually addressed this apparent paradox more than 20 years ago!

Pielke, R. A., & Downton, M. W. (1999). US trends in streamflow and precipitation: Using societal impact data to address an apparent paradox. Bulletin-American Meteorological Society, 80, 1435-1436.
Back to Do et al
Third, trends in floods do not explain trends in damage

Exposure and vulnerability matter more (of course they do)
Fortunately there is now a large literature from around the world that assesses flood damage in the context of both precip/flood trends and trends in vulnerability exposure
doi.org/10.1080/174778…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roger Pielke Jr.

Roger Pielke Jr. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RogerPielkeJr

22 Jul
This is an interesting new paper
For heat outcomes, finds vulnerability reduction can be much more important than climate risk increase

Landreau et al 2021. Combining socio-economic & climate projections to assess heat risk. Climatic Change, 167(1), 1-20.
link.springer.com/article/10.100…
"The assessments of future climate risks are common; however, usually, they focus on climate projections without considering social changes"

True!

If you see a study with "no adaptation" used as a projection of the future, run away, fast!

This paper considers adaptation
How society develops will say more about how future heat risk evolves than will changing climate risk alone

The choices we make ... both emissions and societal will determine our collective future
Read 4 tweets
21 Jul
There is no doubt that attribution claims have run far out ahead of detection of trends

"Since 1951, the number of heavy rainfall days per year for the whole of Germany has hardly changed, almost independently of their definition"
mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/7…

HT @AndrewSiffert
Similarly for Zhengzhou
doi.org/10.1002/joc.51…
I'm not sure how the current strong attribution claims (it's obvious, right?) can be reconciled with the observational data, but I'm sure there is an explanation

If certain extreme events have become much more likely, then evidence should show them being more likely? Or not?
Read 10 tweets
20 Jul
So that was fun

Thanks to @SenateBanking @BankingGOP for the opportunity to testify

Some thoughts on the hearing follow ...
Testimonies of

Frank Nutter @TheRAA
banking.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…

@abdshafiee Abdollah Shafieezade
banking.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…

Smart & w/ much solid policy recommendations to improve resilience & reduce vulnerability

(But both should stop confusing economic loss with climate trends!)
In most hearings I've been in Ds only engage D-invited witnesses & Rs w/ R-invitees

This wall of tribalism broke down today for just a brief moment

@SenatorTester listened to my testimony & express real surprise to learn that disaster losses are down as % GDP

Two points ...
Read 9 tweets
18 Jul
Sport is still rife with doping
Between 10% and 40% of athletes in Tokyo might be cheating
economist.com/science-and-te…
From The Edge
See the EPO?
Pielke, R. (2018). Assessing doping prevalence is possible. So what are we waiting for?. Sports medicine, 48(1), 207-209.

@TheEconomist notes the results of a 2011 WADA/IAAF study of doping prevalence

WADA/IAAF tried to prevent its publication
Details⬇️
Read 7 tweets
18 Jul
I can’t get over how egregiously wrong this NYT article is

Vulnerability to weather extremes is currently lower than it has ever been - in rich and poor countries — ever!

This is one of the most significant science, technology & policy success stories of the past century👍
But what about flood vulnerability in Europe?
Sharply down over the past 150 years

Does that mean no floods? No tragic loss of life and damage?
No of course not

Reducing vulnerability is never completed but the trends are remarkable & that’s good news

nature.com/articles/s4146…
The idea that “no one is safe” (NYT)
Is as much misinformation as anti-vaccine propaganda

People around the world have never in all of history been more safe in the face of weather and climate extremes

Is there still vulnerability, exposure & loss?
You bet

More work to do?
Yes
Read 4 tweets
17 Jul
My piece in the WSJ today on the importance of climate adaptation
My discussion of Mike Hulme’s “climate reductionism” didn’t survive the edit, but it is a really important piece for understanding the incredible flattening of knowledge on climate

d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/52603703/2011_…
“In this new mood of climate-driven destiny the human hand, as the cause of climate change, has replaced the divine hand of God as being responsible for the collapse of civilizations, for visitations of extreme weather & for determining the new 21st-century wealth of nations”
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(