Were 4 Americans involved in a Chinese PsyOp against the US?
1. It all started in May when, for the first time, China hawk @amymaxmen agrees with an Uighur Genocide denialist then publishes in @NatureNV Chinese propaganda and disinformation on @DavidRelman and #drastic.
2. Maxmen quotes @angie_rasmussen's false allegation that racist Kevin McCairn is the same decent @KevinMcH from #drastic. They claim McCairn's attacks were inspired by the @DavidRelman group's letter in @ScienceMagazine asking for the lab leak hypothesis be seriously considered.
3. @angie_rasmussen's past work was funded by the Deptartment of Defense and now at @georgetown_ghss also by the FBI. How their values can be compatible with her anti-Semitism, harassment of other scientists with unfounded racism claims and a pro-China stance remains a mystery.
4. Days later, Amy & Angela coordinate to harass #drastic. Same day a pro-China troll attacks Angie. She plays the victim, claims she's stalked in real life. When she's told that user tweeted same threat to others, she blocks them. The ladies then shift the blame on Drastic.
5. Right2vote100 is also dddeeeeeeeee. He used same tweet to attack those criticizing China and called Fauci’s FOIA emails a conspiracy. He also instigated doxing police officers. In real life it seems he sells filtration systems for labs like those @angie_rasmussen worked in.
6. Same month, @Columbia@profvrr Racaniello, Rasmussen’s mentor & a regular on China Global TV, accuses same @DavidRelman of demanding more origin investigations. and the US Gov of politicizing the investigations. It's noteworthy he has received at least 67 NIH grants!
7. Few days later, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian quotes @profvrr Racaniello's earlier China Global TV attacks on Relman & the US Gov, to accuse the US of politicizing the science & condoning threats on scientists like @angie_rasmussen.
8. For these 4 Americans the campaign was a first & they likely coordinated. They focused on @DavidRelman, of the Intelligence Community Studies Board, who put the lab leak hypothesis on the table. @Ayjchan & @jbloom_lab were actually harassed by @angie_rasmussen. Not vice versa!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING NEWS! The entire website onehealtplatform.com has been deleted to cover-up One Health's ties to Peter Daszak. It has been replaced by worldonehealthcongress.org which makes no mention of him or the 5 year history of bat CoVs collection, research & biodefence policy. 1/7
The new site was launched after 27.04.20 and linked with the old one until 18.03.21, when the menu is striped of the old link, past events, etc. Until May 6th the old site redirects to the new one. Then onehealthplatform.com and Daszak's history get permanently deleted. 2/7
The '20 congress still invites Ecohealth but swaps Daszak for Karesh, promoted to chair. It's striking the Biodefence committee stays the same from the '18 congress in Canada. Poor Daszak was the only one to pay for the pandemic and had to do a talk at a One Health sideshow. 3/7
The thread were I first saw the screenshot of the "nazi" tweet. This must've refreshed her memory and prompted the cover-up. It has also confirmed my hunches:
NEW EVIDENCE The @pulitzercenter did try to hide the page of the conference attended by Daszak by:
1.Altering its URL in between Dec 2020 and Feb 2021
2.Using suboptimal SEO tags to reduce its Google visibility
3.Not making it visible on the participants’ profile pages 1/5
By deleting “from”, the new link would return no results from the Wayback Machine archive. By using the canonical tag instead of a 301 redirect, the page loses the previous visibility. The event was also hidden from the Maxmen and Shah's profiles, like it never happened. Why? 2/5
Maybe because Daszak revealed he was doing GOF research with his “Chinese colleagues.” In 2016 that was quite illegal because of the Obama ban. Watch those startled looks when he says it. Also look at the archiving frenzy of the NYAM conference webpage triggered by Daszak’s talk.
Before 2020, @amymaxmen was not shy to criticize China. So why does the @pulitzercenter and @KSJatMIT grantee now think the Uighur Genocide is just an internal Chinese affair? And 4 days latter aligns herself with the Chinese narrative in her @Nature article. What happened? 1/2
Well, @PeterDaszak and the Chinese influence over @Nature happened. In the same article, Amy and virologist @angie_rasmussen from @georgetown_ghss fabricate misinformation about the lab leak investigation group #DRASTIC, then spread it on Twitter. Maxmen with Daszak in 2016. 2/2
For the whole picture on the Chinese propaganda and China's influence in the western scientific media read @ianbirrell's article: unherd.com/2021/06/beijin…