I think it’s time for a thread looking at the overall strategic situation in Afghanistan.
Why? Because there seems to be some sort of narrative that the Taliban are going to win and the government is useless
This sort of stuff from the Americans @CENTCOM who should really know better.
“strategic momentum is currently with the Taliban”
Well I’m not so sure about that
As I’ve said before - I don’t think the north was about Taliban brilliance, rather government repositioning to strategic areas, and admittedly government weakness in some areas.
There’s a lot of international attention there and lots of weapons are being moved in. Strong rumours the Indians are getting involved in defence of Kabul and we can expect US SOF to be involved as well.
So I think Kabul is safe.
The Taliban can try Jalalabad but that’s pretty pro-government and the echoes of 1989 are strong.
So the Taliban control a lot of dust and the government controls the cities.
Don’t mistake this as a defence of the gov - I think a lot of their security forces and especially allied militias are war criminals.
And most Afghans don’t want bullshit Taliban rule either.
But the government will not fall and the Americans and the international media are calling this wrong (the US esp should know better as they’ve just resumed air strikes which is a big strategic move).
Finally Afghan history teaches us that fighting coalitions tend to stick together when they are winning and they tend to drift apart when bogged down or losing. Watch this space as the ‘Taliban’ fragment.
And I think the Taliban in Doha are realising this.
And they have been receiving strong messages from the Chinese and Pakistanis that forceful takeover of Afg is not the way forward.
And so they come out with statements like this:
“I want to make it clear that we do not believe in the monopoly of power because any governments who (sought) to monopolize power in Afg in the past, were not successful governments,” said @suhailshaheen1, apparently including the Taliban’s own 5-year rule in that assessment.
So there we have it. Two fractured coalitions, just about holding together, now edging towards talks, hopefully supported by the wider region.
We are not yet at the beginning of the end, but perhaps we are at the end of the beginning.
As ever if you’d like to read more, check out my book, with a massive discount:
It’s looks like Kandahar is entering a critical stage. Here I’m going to try and pull together various sources. STRONG CAVEAT - this is fast moving and hard to confirm
The main headline is that it appears likely that there is going to be a post-Eid push to take Kandahar by the Taliban.
Needless to say, Taliban control of Kandahar would be the most significant aspect of the war so far, by some way.
Events are moving very fast in Afghanistan. Time for another thread:
What is the role of China now and in the future?
(Apologies to those expecting some thoughts on counter-narcotics but events are moving very fast)
Some basics:
- Afghanistan and China share a 76km border between Badakhshan and Xinjiang Provinces;
- There is no official border crossing point, and the route is mountainous;
A lot has been happening in Afghanistan recently. Time, I think, for another thread, this time focussing on the Taliban(s).
I will also put some questions to Zabihullah Mujahid (@Zabehulah_M33) who is the Official Spokesman of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan AKA the Taliban
So, regular followers will know that I'm pretty sceptical of the Taliban being this organised Maoist-type insurgency that is coordinated and organised, and has this grand plan of taking over Afghanistan and organising a government.
For sure, there are some Taliban leaders (mostly from the 1996-2001 TB government, or related to them) who entertain fantasies of going back to that time.
There seems to be a bit of an (internal) debate amongst US commentators (many of whom have never been to Afghanistan) about whether the US achieved its goals or whether it was worth it.
I’ve been feeling for a while that I should mention some stuff about Afghanistan.
A thread:
So we have this deal; which is nothing more than a smokescreen for the US (et al) withdrawing after completely failing in their objectives
/1
Don’t gimme that “oh they sorted out AQ” rubbish - they did that in ten minutes in ‘01.
I’m talking about their aims once they decided to go down the expansion around the country, developmenty, governancey, women rights, counter narco, counterinsurgency type aims (frm c2004)
/2