here's a text exchange from Feb 2, 2017 (in Grassley Dec 2020 drop) that gives some light on poorly documented early inauguration period as Comey led metastasis of Crossfire into resistance. On Jan 1, Crossfire had been decentralized. Prob to make it harder to uproot.
Interview with Danchenko had been on Jan 24, 2017. Auten said that he filed interview notes in case file and never briefed anyone on inconsistencies. Somma was transferred to new job. Comey and other FBI officials obtusely say that they know nothing about Danchenko interview.
3/ this is for context. Texts don't refute implausible obtuseness, but shed other light.
(a) Agent told Boone that OIO (FBI Office of International Operations) was discussing Steele with REDACTED and forwarded Boone an email from an OIO Undercover (UC) on Steele. This is new.
4/ (b) Agent also told Boone that WaPo planning a story on Steele and was concerned that WaPo "may name more subsources and will out REDACTED". Given time proximity, seems likely/plausible that this REDACTED is Igor Danchenko. Agent was headed to OPA (Office of Public Affairs).
5/ I've looked for a candidate story in Washington Post in first half February 2017 that would match this description and couldn't find one (nor do I recall one.) If anyone can find one, please let me know.
6/ the implication is that FBI must have persuaded WaPo to spike story on Steele and his sources. If WaPo actually knew and published identities of Danchenko and some of subsources (Vorontsov, Galkina), it would have been huge blow to Russiagate hoax before it became a monster.
7/ it's also possible that "sources" "known" to WaPo were the fantasy names: Trubnikov, Surkov - all implausible sources for different reason - also dealing blow to hoax.
8/ As WaPo itself says, "democracy dies in darkness". Hard to contemplate a more vivid proof of this epithet than the apparent subservience of Washington Post to FBI in spiking Steele story, thus permitting Russiagate hoax to further grow and metastasize.
9/ and what became of information from OIO undercover about Steele? No mention in Horowitz.
But something happened between the 1/5 meeting at which Comey (according to Jane Mayer's sources) used Steele info to alarm Obama officials into a sort of lawfare insurrection and Mueller
10/ since the avoidance of specific Steele allegations by Mueller investigators was so total. What happened between Comey 1/5 horror briefing and Mueller appointment to scare Mueller investigators away from Steele?
11/ Boone closed brief exchange by telling agent to coordinate with REDACTED "since there's so much crossover with Steele reporting". I wonder what that was. No apparent reference in Horowitz.
12/ Jen Boone appears to have had an important role in period in which Crossfire metastasized from the questionable but not seditious 2016 investigation into the 2017 lawfare insurrection culminating in Mueller appointment. Yet she wasn't questioned by Senate Committee.
13/ next Boone texts in Grassley package are 6 days later: Feb 9, 2017. Agent with longish name. First draft of something almost done. Wonder what it was. (For those who suggest Flynn 302, be wary of the "looking for keys under streetlight" bias. Almost certainly something else.)
14/ later in Boone texts, Mar 16, 2017, she and McGonigal discuss "TS FISA" being briefed to House HPSCI. Carter Page was being interviewed in NY as they were texting. Wonder what "TS" FISA is in this context? Seems to be other than Crossfire.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The impact of the descent into extremism of French Revolution in July 1793 reverberates today in Toronto in the re-naming of a major city street (Dundas St.) In April 1793, Henry Dundas had sponsored a bill to end slave trade in British empire. Today Dundas is being canceled
2/ for supposedly prolonging slave trade for decades. In fact, Dundas' 1793 bill, amended to put an end date of 1796 instead of 1800, was first bill passed in Commons to end slave TRADE (slavery already illegal in Britain itself), but defeated in Lords.
3/ an amendment for an earlier end date was defeated in Commons. Yet today's ahistorical partisans somehow blame Dundas for failure to end slave trade in April 1793. When issue was raised again in 1796, Britain was embroiled in war with revolutionary France.
and what did these generals do to stop Obama admin from regime change operations against Libya, Syria, Yemen. Did they ask why Obama admin was "so intent on attacking Syria"? Libya? Yemen? Why did generals sabotage Trump attempt to exit Syria?
what does New Yorker article archive.is/vlAuF actually show? That Trump had one set of advisers that were anti-Iran zealots and another set of advisers who weren't. Milley says that his belief was that "Trump did not want a war". Nor did Trump start one.
2/ Milley said that Trump "kept pushing for a missile strike in response to various provocations against U.S. interests in the region". I.e. exactly as Biden did on Feb 21 and again in June and what Trump had done in Jan 2020 cnn.com/2021/02/26/pol…
A new thread on Curveball and how he was eventually exposed as a fabricator.
In theory, source validation (as even FBI James Baker claimed) attempts to validate whether source was in location of supposed meeting or made alleged telephone call, or, as here, presence at accident
2/ a few analysts were suspicious of Curveball prior to Powell's notorious speech to UN and subsequent Iraq invastion, but suspicions ignored. After invasion, none of the project designers named by Curveball knew who he was, contradicting narrative that Curveball part of program
3/ in Sept 2003, inconsistencies began to accumulate. Curveball had claimed to be part of bioweapon program that began in 1995, but it turned out that Curveball had been fired in 1995 and could not have been part of any supposed program.
@BarryMeier@tafrank@praddenkeefe@HansMahncke@FOOL_NELSON@walkafyre 2/ examine original documents. We do not shrug when documents are redacted, but, using deep knowledge of the subject matter and ingenuity, interpolate and interpret the documents so that their story is revealed and not concealed.
@BarryMeier@tafrank@praddenkeefe@HansMahncke@FOOL_NELSON@walkafyre 3/ instead of advocating for secrecy and suppression of documents and concealing identity of fabricators like Danchenko and Steele, we believe in transparency and cleansing power of sunshine. Definitely not NYT "journalism", which whinged about identification of Danchenko
the report of the WMD Commission in March 2005 is important to read (or re-read) in light of our present knowledge that Danchenko/Steele fabricated Steele dossier. fas.org/irp/offdocs/wm…
2/ perhaps their most important concern was that CIA intelligence officials "failed to convey to policymakers new information casting serious doubt on the reliability of a human intelligence
source known as Curveball", whose information was relied on in intel assessment.
3/ the WMD Commission regretted that "once again", the intel community "failed to give policymakers a full understanding of the frailties of the intelligence on which they were relying."
one of the big mistakes by everyone in connection with Steele dossier is to think in terms of LeCarre's Cold War epics, when the reality is LeCarre's Tailor of Panama. Read this excerpt.
2/ Danchenko corresponds to Harry, the Tailor of Panama, who is recruited by Osnard, an ambitious and greedy idiot in UK spy agency. Harry needed money. Like Danchenko. Harry had no sources, so he made them up. Transforming nobodies into "sources", then making up stories.
3/ the plot line of Tailor of Panama is a re-make of Graham Greene's 1959 novella Our Man in Havana, another "spy" recruited by UK spy agency who had no sources, so he made everything up.