It's not revisionist, Francois. A lot of us pointed this out very much at the start- remember the John Snow Memo. While you were signing letters supporting a strategy of focused protection - a letter that stated cases would've declined in our 1st wave without lockdown anyway. 🧵 
And there is no 'logistical support' that makes this viable as many of us pointed out & as this study shows. Vulnerable people are part of society. They live in households & form part of interconnected networks in society. You cannot protect them without containing the pandemic.
Maybe have the humility of accepting you promoted a flawed strategy, rather than attacking the people who challenged it rightly from the start (not in retrospect). Some self-reflection wouldn't go amiss here.
you've already blocked me, but do feel free to continue to attack/troll me, or subtweet about me, and others who've called it right from the start.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
