#SupremeCourt is hearing a petition filed by former Maharashtra home minister Anil Deshmukh, seeking protection from any "coercive action", in the money laundering case registered against him by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) @AnilDeshmukhNCP
Justice Khanwilkar: Where is the question of staying the further proceedings?
Anil Deshmukh, accused of money laundering, is being probed by the ED for alleged extortion from a bunch of orchestra bars in the city. @AnilDeshmukhNCP
Justice Khanwilkar: serve a copy on the standing counsel of Maharashtra
SC: In these writ petitions besides challenging the constitutional validity of the PMLA Act, prayer has been made for quashing the proceedings as under the PMLA provisions.
SC: Not a single order has been brought to our notice and only other cases have been brought before us to have no coercive steps against the petitioners. SG says it is time to revisit those orders. He has relied on 3 judge bench orders.
SC: This plea be listed on August 3 along with connected cases so that the relief of no coercive action be considered.
Adv Vikram Chaudhuri: The order being show is in GST batch. HC wanted to decide the PMLA cases but union filed a transfer plea here
Justice Khawilkar: we will deal with this on August 3.
Justice Khanwilkar: no one is pointing fingers at you. We will consider all cases together on August 3
SG: My submission is this case needs to be heard by this court as several HCs have taken different stand
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#BombayHighCourt to hear the plea filed by #ShilpaShetty to restrain publication of defamatory information against her in connection with the arrest of her husband #RajKundra in porn film racket case.
The New Indian Express, India TV, Free Press Journal, NDTV, Facebook, Instagram, and Facebook, among others have been made parties to the defamation suit by Shetty.
Delhi High Court to hear WhatsApp, Facebook challenge to single judge order refusing to set aside DG investigation ordered by Competition Commission of India into WhatsApp Privacy Policy
Justice GS Patel is informed in a case that a lawyer who earlier appeared for the defendant has now appeared for the plaintiff.
I know our standards have slipped but this much!?
There is no consideration of any consequence any longer.
Justice Patel: What happened to our ability to say no!
I don’t understand how this lawyer entertained the plaintiff in his office, forget about drafting the plaint, and taking instructions. Is it possible to say that, that was a different matter.. Really?
Justice Patel: I know how it is done to get around, but here there is no pretence.
Maybe we should just shop on the original side and go! Just close it down. Because then this has become a market place.
Sr Adv Sibal: The civil liberties of citizens, politicians belonging to opposition parties, journalists, court staff have been put under surveillance. This is a issue which is making waves in India and world over and requires an urgent hearing. @KapilSibal
CJI NV Ramana: We will hear the matter next week
@KapilSibal : Please dont keep it on Tuesday or Wednesday
Justice DY Chandrachud led bench of #SupremeCourt to hear plea by Late Swami Om Ji & Mukesh Jain, national chairman of Dharma Rakshak Shri Dara Sena in connection with plea by which SC slapped fine of Rs 10 Lakh for challenging the appointment of the then #CJI Dipak Misra
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: this is for cost reduction
Justice Chandrachud: Mukesh jain has been released from Balasore?
ASG Bhati: please keep in mind the allegations before reducing the cost
Adv AP Singh: Other cases are pending in Odisha and he is still in custody. There are three cases on same cause of action
Justice MR Shah: you are appearing for jain?
Justice Chandrachud: When will you pay?
Singh: during COVID he is in custody for over 1 year.
#BombayHighCourt administrative committee meeting decides the following effective from Monday.
1 - High Court shall work physically on 3 days and virtually for 1 day.
2 - Steps will be taken to implement fully hybrid system in all court rooms.
3 - Circulation of matters shall be via precipie sent by emails for the time being. Mentioning on virtual platform will be permitted.
4 - Litigants will be permitted inside court premises only if their presence is required by the Hon’ble Court
The Central Government and State Government officials will work out modalities to facilitate travel of lawyers and clerks/staff ( who have taken 2 jabs) to travel by train by issuance of a monthly pass.