Putting aside that even achieving elimination (no more left in your country) once you have reached high levels of disease is near impossible (see @TAH_Sci blog)
The costs of even trying to achieve this for somewhere like the UK would be astronomical
3/
But even if we did - then what? The virus is literally everywhere
LMICs will be trying to catch up with vaccination for years
We've seen even now countries like Aus with high restrictive controls (now utilising military) are struggling to keep it out
4/
There is no "end game" to zero covid, because ultimately, there is no zero covid. Restrictions continues indefinitely.
The only alternative to chasing this dream is facing reality, which is commonly referred to as "living with the virus". What does that mean?
5/
It means once you have a massive amount of your population vaccinated (most importantly older adults), you accept transmission will occur, but with substantially reduced levels of morbidity or mortality
You stop caring about "cases", and just about the harm they result in
6/
#COVID19 essentially blends into the background risks we accept from other infectious diseases
We already "live with" Flu, RSV, HMPV etc, and vaccination should reduce the morbidity and mortality of #COVID19 to be commensurate to these other risks
7/
It doesn't mean giving up. It doesn't mean not caring. It doesn't mean not taking #COVID19 seriously
It means reducing #COVID19 to a threat level which means highly invasive and disruptive methods of suppressing it are no longer worth-while
That's what vaccines do
8/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A randomised trial of daily testing of school contacts of COVID-19 cases found it was just as good (or maybe better) at preventing transmission than sending kids home
Some seems to be some confusion on why it's better to coincide easing of restrictions with schools closing for summer
If schools are not drivers of community transmission, why does it matter?
Don't worry, it's quite simple! Let me explain...
1/
Firstly, closing schools does not just stop transmission in school
When schools are closed, adults have to stay home, change their plans etc to look after children
This appears to be a pretty major source of reduction in R associated with school closures in general
2/
For example, modelling frequently shows closing Primary schools to reduce R by a greater degree than closing Secondary schools, despite more transmission occurring in Secondary age children
This is likely because closing primary schools forces more parents to remain home
3/