Thread by @TheUfoJoe

1 I'm pretty sure most people don't remember this...

The Tic Tac shot off to the left & that was the end of the encounter & video. Well, not according to @JTurner423, who was onboard the Princeton.

JT: "And then, once you see it where it takes off & goes to the left. That is

2 JT "when they started chasing this thing. And then it was making maneuvers that no human being could ever survive. The g-forces that would be put on these people would just…you would die…instantly. And then being in these… you know, the jets, the fighter jets and not being

3 JT: "able to keep up with them at all. That’s mind-blowing.”

@GaryVoorhis, who was also onboard the Princeton, says he saw a longer video of Tic Tac, too.

“We were watching it. We were watching the entire video, just like [Jason] Turner. He was lucky 2 have a top secret

4 GV: "clearance and a friend in a space that he could watch it. It was honestly amazing. This thing moved with no apparent inertial…gravity didn’t seem to affect it. It would stop and go. It never really ramped up in speed. It just went from point A to point B at X speed.

5 GV: "Period. And just as erratic as you would even imagine. After we got done watching the video and, you know…a bit stunned. But to me, I’ve always been very interested in physics, engineering and this object just showed me a level of physics and a level of engineering that

6 GV: "I didn’t even know is possible."

And Chad Underwood - @chad_vfa41 to @CBMDP...

"The thing that stood out to me the most was how erratic it was behaving. And what I mean by 'erratic' is that its changes in altitude, air speed, and aspect were just unlike things that I’ve

7 CU: "ever encountered before flying against other air targets. It was just behaving in ways that aren’t physically normal. That’s what caught my eye. Because, aircraft, whether they’re manned or unmanned, still have to obey the laws of physics. They have to have some source of

8 CU: "lift, some source of propulsion. The Tic Tac was not doing that. It was going from like 50,000 feet to, you know, a hundred feet in like seconds, which is not possible."

MP: "And it was doing that during your engagement too?"

CU: "Yes. That was the thing that was the

9 CU: "most interesting to me: how erratic this thing was If it was obeying physics like a normal object that you would encounter in the sky — an aircraft, or a cruise missile, or some sort of special project that the government didn’t tell you about — that would have made more

10 CU: "sense to me. The part that drew our attention was how it wasn’t behaving within the normal laws of physics." You’re up there flying, like, “Okay. It’s not behaving in a manner that’s predictable or is normal by how flying objects physically move.”

~Chad Underwood

11 What say you, #ufotwitter? What's going on?

Two links/sources...

Jason and Gary from March 2019...

Jason said the Tic Tac video he saw was 7-10 mins long.

More...

ufojoe.net/second-tic-tac…

Underwood from December 2019...

nymag.com/intelligencer/…

12 Notes these two comments from CU...

"So, at that point I didn’t see anything with my eyeballs."

"At that point, I did not actually see the object aggressively accelerate to the left, as the video shows, to actually prove that."

13 MP: "Bc u were at a distance where u couldn’t make visual contact w/ur own eyes."

CU: "Right."

* * *

If I say something like, "At that point, I didn't see it w/my eyes," I mean that at some other point, I DID.

Just my thoughts. Also, original had audio. I wanna hear CU.