July was a busy month as I objectively reviewed all my holdings and realised that I wasn't happy with all of them.
After witnessing the disaster show in Chinese stocks, I also realised how important governance is and that certain countries are inherently riskier..
...than others and why assets in such jurisdictions almost always appear 'cheap' and 'undervalued'.
Elsewhere, due to the spread of the COVID variants, I also realised how wonderful the recurring-revenue software businesses truly are, so I took advantage of the spring/...
....summer swoon and bought shares in $OKTA $PATH and $ZI. Furthermore, I also added to my positions in $PLTR and $SNOW.
It is my belief that these software businesses are truly special because they are mission critical for businesses, enterprises *need* them to function,....
...in most cases, they are deeply integrated into organisations' work flows, they have recurring revenues, they are growing like weeds, they have massive TAMs, most are Founder-led, they have super-juicy gross margins and at scale, they should generate 20-30% operating margins...
...If you recall, the Sage of Omaha has made his fortune by owning dominant businesses with predictable cash flows (insurance, consumer staples/brands, utilities etc) and he has largely stayed away from boom & bust, commodity-type businesses.
Well, in today's day and age....
....the software companies not only offer super stable recurring revenues + predictable cash flows, they are also re-investing and growing rapidly!
In addition to software, the dominant ecommerce and online payments businesses also offer similar business characteristics..
...i.e. repeat purchases from customers throughout the business cycle, sticky customers (who tend to stay), capital light operations, network effects, decent margins and fairly predictable cash flows.
IMHO, these businesses are the "modern-day utilities on steroids"....
... and some of them are the best asset-light compounding machines ever created in the history of capitalism.
Speaking of online payments, a couple of weeks ago, I also invested in D-Local $DLO which appears to be a fantastic high-growth South American payments business!...
$DLO is run by founders (collectively, they own ~50% of the company's shares!) and it helps enterprise customers in doing business/accepting payments in the developing markets.
Its customer-list is super impressive and currently, it derives approximately 90% of its revenue...
...from South America. Fortunately, the company is expanding in other parts of the world and some analysts are pitching it as the "Adyen of the emerging markets".
The business is very early innings, its penetration rate amongst its enterprise customers is still mid single...
...digits of their total payments (versus mid-30% for Adyen) so the growth runway is quite long.
As an added kicker, the company is already profitable and both revenues and profits are expected to grow rapidly over the next 3-5 years.
Turning to the eVTOL space, I recently..
came across a promising founder-led business "Lilium" which has a formidable management team and board (ex-CEO of Airbus, key executives from Airbus, Boeing and Rolls Royce etc) and was quite impressed by their company culture and aircraft design!
After researching...
...the business and learning about its long-term plans, I decided to change my horse in this race. I sold shares of Joby Aviation $RTP and invested in Lilium $QELL.
In order to raise cash for these new investments, during July I sold some of my lower-conviction holdings $DKNG $OZON $PINS $SOFI $UPST
As usual, I'm simply trying to allocate my capital to my highest-conviction, highest quality businesses which I can find and it is...
...inevitable that I'll continue to make mistakes along the way.
In fact, I can guarantee you that I'll pick some lemons (bad apples) in the future and I will also sell out of some companies which will turn out to be big winners.
Unfortunately, since investing is all...
...about the future and tomorrow is largely unknowable, mistakes are normal in this business and I'll also do some dumb things in the future.
However, I remain hopeful that I'll do more right than wrong and hang onto the rights for long periods of time so they more than...
...compensate me for my mistakes.
In any event, given the information known to me today, I firmly believe that my capital is currently invested in the most promising businesses but of course, when new data emerges, I reserve the right to change my mind.
This is why nobody...
...should blindly follow my moves or invest in my companies without doing adequate homework.
After all, only you know your circumstances, volatility tolerance, financial objectives and most importantly, your financial future is on the line.
Hope this has been helpful.
END.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Judging by some of the comments on here, many would rather sit through a gut wrenching decline (40-50% drawdown in their portfolio) and pray than put up with a few whipsaws when the market reverses higher soon after putting on a hedge.
Strange logic...beats me but hey-ho!
EVERY single stock market crash or major decline starts off as a 'normal pullback'. No way to differentiate which one(s) will turn out to be a hair-curler.
This is why best to take every signal and defend capital during every downtrend. Whipsaws are NORMAL and can't be avoided.
Whipsaws do NOT cause drawdowns in a portfolio, they simply cause one to miss out on some upside (portfolio stays more or less flat until hedges are removed).
When large declines come along (and they do), big profits from hedging tend to cover the whipsaw losses.
Leader in Robotics Process Automation
80%+ gross margin
Founder-led (he owns > 20% of shares)
Impressive revenue growth
TAM --> $60b+
145% $ based net retention rate
A number of you have asked how to hedge, so here is a thread....
Hedging allows one to stay long (participate in the upside) during uptrends, but it makes the portfolio "market neutral" during downtrends.
Hedging isn't fool proof and doesn't work...
...perfectly all the time. On some days, the portfolio goes up a little and on other days, it goes down a little (usually less than 50bps) *but* hedging does help in avoiding big drawdowns during stock market turbulence.
Hedging is akin to "fire insurance", it usually costs...
...in terms of some missed upside when the market quickly reverses higher but it pays off big time when there is a major stock market decline or crash.
In those instances, profits from the hedges can be invested in stocks (when they are severely beaten down) and this really...
When I post trades in real-time, trolls claim I'm pumping my book. When I don't post trades in real-time, the same people claim I'm faking trades with the benefit of hindsight.
Since so many have asked, on Tuesday I've sold my $UPST shares.
$UPST has guided for triple digit revenue growth this year but the growth estimates are pretty weak from '22 onwards. Company's valuation is pretty rich given the business slowdown on the horizon.
After thinking about this business for months, there are too many question...
....marks for my taste. Put simply, I just don't see a durable competitive advantage, a genuine secret sauce.
This is why, I've booked a tidy profit and moved on. I may be wrong, the business might turn out to be a big winner but this one isn't for me. "Too tough" pile.
Trimming or permanently selling out of winners for no good reason is a terrible idea!
The big returns are generated by holding, not by selling.
By "taking" a 20% or 30% of 40% profit, one misses out on 200% or 300% or 400% gains.
If you sell, you can no longer benefit from those stocks.
Very few companies compound like crazy, best to hold onto them for as long as possible.
IMHO, the reasons when a great stock should be sold -
- Business matures (can't grow)
- Management changes or deteriorates
- The business outlook deteriorates (competition)
- Cash is needed for a younger compounder
- Stock triples/quadruples within months
Discovered today that a few anonymous haters (one of whom is a convicted felon - he was imprisoned for defrauding investors out of hundreds of millions) published my "career history" a few weeks ago to smear my reputation.
Their biased summary is an attempt to rewrite history.
Some facts -
I was a Founding Director/major shareholder (one of three business partners) of my first investment management firm which was founded in 2001 (when I was 24 years old).
After discovering questionable conduct, I immediately resigned from that firm, sold...
...my shares and founded my own boutique investment management firm in 2005 which managed capital for companie, family offices and high net worth individuals.
I ran my firm until 2016, which is when I retired from the business and my company was acquired by a Hong Kong...