Dear @AgnesCallamard kudos to you for diversifying @amnesty into an IT surveillance company as well while doing all these campaigns. But this diversification of yours raises more unanswered Qns and doubts abt ur motivation! 
https://twitter.com/alok_bhatt/status/1417358206674767873
Although the integrity of the supposed database claimed to have been the record of 50,000 telephone nos chosen for snooping by countries allegedly using NSO software - @AgnesCallamard you all have not said a word abt that
https://twitter.com/alok_bhatt/status/1417359024840876032
The association and collusion of @amnesty and motivated organisation like @citizenlab is established by the fact that they are loaning their employees to you for running Shane projects like #PegasusProject
https://twitter.com/alok_bhatt/status/1417366645127794693
Via a report released on 18 July 2021, @AgnesCallamard your organisation claimed to have developed a methodology to catch NSOs Pegasus - it is another matter that after 15 days you r now training ur guns on VCs funding cyber tech cos/ wonder who is funding this witch hunt!
Coming back to this report of 18th July - whereby @AgnesCallamard , @amnesty’s newly diversified IT surveillance unit run by @tenacioustek claimed to have developed a tool called MVT - or mobile verification toolkit - classic modus operandi of breaking democracy forces like urs!
On the MVT, can you @AgnesCallamard or @tenacioustek answer few Qns around this tool kit released by amnesty
1) it claims to gather traces - we all know how there are plethora of tools like UFED, Magnet, Spyier, Termux etc - all developed by IT cos and not Human Right org
1) it claims to gather traces - we all know how there are plethora of tools like UFED, Magnet, Spyier, Termux etc - all developed by IT cos and not Human Right org
In view of that, what is the guarantee that your tool is not a malicious attempt to infect phones with your malware to support your hypothesis. This is important as NSO has already rejected your claims and integrity of ur data is questionable @AgnesCallamard
https://twitter.com/alok_bhatt/status/1422230015006052355
2. All the tools are developed using some test data - here your tool, from the word go is focussed on a 50,000 phone numbers database that you had produced out of thin air and efficacy as well as integrity thereof is questionable - how is that justified @AgnesCallamard
3. @AgnesCallamard - given your association with shady organisations like Sherpa and OSF and selection of 11 countries proves that the motivation behind releasing this tool is abt keeping a dead story alive to hit the detractors of your funders - can you counter this claim?
4. Ur claimed methodology defies all norms of IT development cycle and besides-
1) tool that u claim to have developed is aimed at a co that is your/ your associate’s target since 2016
2) the data used to develop was already in Q
3) you have issued a warning against its usage
1) tool that u claim to have developed is aimed at a co that is your/ your associate’s target since 2016
2) the data used to develop was already in Q
3) you have issued a warning against its usage
I call upon IT pros on my tool to demolish @amnesty and it’s methodology as enunciated in this amnesty.org/en/latest/rese… or this github.com/mvt-project/mvt
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
