Thread by @SethAbramson

(🔐) BREAKING NEWS: Three Obscure Pre-Insurrection Meetings Require Immediate Congressional Investigation

No matter how much you think you know about January 6, you probably haven't heard about these critical events. I hope you'll subscribe, read, and RT. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…

1/ I chafe when Democrats repeat their self-contradictory mantra on the insurrection, which somehow includes *both* the line "We know what happened on January 6" (half-right) *and* "We have to find out what happened on January 6" (half-right). This article underlines the problem.

2/ In the article's Introduction, I recap the *15* meetings that preceded the attack on the Capitol that are absolutely *essential* to any investigation of "what happened on January 6." Virtually all these meetings *preceded* January 6. The fact is, there is *much* we don't know.

3/ But the three meetings discussed in the article proper are *not* among those 15. PROOF, which has published more articles on pre-insurrection meetings than any other U.S. publication has, has *never* written about these three meetings before. They're almost entirely unknown.

4/ What they *aren't* is unimportant.

A pre-insurrection parking-garage meeting between the two domestic terrorists whose paramilitary organizations spearheaded the Capitol attack?

That's...pretty damn important. And I didn't need to be a former federal investigator to know it.

5/ A major national address by the sitting President of the United States to GOP legislators in every battleground state just 96 hours before the insurrection—on the subject of overturning the will of American voters? You'd think that topic would be on everyone's lips.

It isn't.

6/ A large GOP Congressional caucus contingent secretly meeting with insurrectionists—men advocating for Trump to impose martial law and seize control of overturning America's 2020 election via federal troops—a day before the Capitol attack? You'd *think* CNN would cover it.

No.

PS/ We know now that 100+ CNN employees follow this feed (the link below says 93 only because I haven't yet added 10+ more names my research revealed; I was too busy writing this article!) It's time for major media to stop its bloviating and report *news*. sethabramson.substack.com/p/proof-some-n…

PS2/ CNN, MSNBC, and other major media outlets could *easily* spend a *day* reporting on *each* of the 18 pre-insurrection meetings PROOF uncovered and wrote about at length using reliable sources—including, usually, eyewitnesses. Instead, we get talking heads.

It *has* to stop.

PS3/ I'd be amazed if anyone read the well-sourced article above and didn't say, "WTF? Why haven't I seen this on TV?"

That's a question I can't answer. Hopefully some of the thousands of journalists who follow this feed can (see the link above and this): sethabramson.substack.com/p/proof-some-n…

PS4/ As ever, PROOF owes a debt of gratitude to its readers for complementing the work PROOF has already done with an amazing volume of absolutely stunning research. A good deal of this content would have been impossible without that assistance.