As someone who broke the news to Israeli leaders on Sweden’s handling of COVID-19 in Mar. 2020, I am so distressed to be reading this now m.ynet.co.il/articles/hj30k…
When will Homo Sapiens realize that we can never stop a tiny virus & re-engineer human biology by force not smarts?
Please note that the two translation are automatic. I give independent results from Microsoft and Google. The original is in Hebrew.
Taking this opportunity to rejoice in machine translation. It it so worthwhile to get used to its quirks.
Fortunately age-adjusted excess death in Israel for the 75 weeks from 1-Jan-20 to 6-Jun-21 is almost as small as that in Sweden (<2% of natural death in 75 weeks)
Economic, social, medical & educational cost to Israel likely higher than to Sweden.
Does anyone have good data?
Involved with Israel & Sweden since Mar-20, I add comparison of vaccination.
Both are now highly vaccinated, IL with Pfizer (mRNA), SE with AstraZeneca (Adenovirus DNA).
IL over 60% level 90 days earlier.
Should we worry SE has Delta wave ahead?
Is Pfizer == AstraZeneca?
Thanks for clarification that Sweden is mostly Pfizer mRNA. I was lazy in looking it up.
Still, if vaccination patterns are so similar, do we expect a Swedish Delta Wave 90 days after Israel’s Delta Wave.
Nice Deltoid muscle joke.
Delta certainly is a catchy Greek letter.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/8 Rather than make plots of one measure against another, we get the correlation coefficient of all pairs of measures.
Correlation coefficient, CC, of A to B is same as CC of B to A so table is symmetric. Correlation coefficient of A to A is always 1; it is whited out here.
1/7 Excess death (E) in any period is the difference between the actual all-cause deaths and those that are expected. Expected deaths in the current year, c, can be calculated in many ways. Easiest is to use the data from a few recent years as a reference (we use, 2017 to 2019).
2/7 Data can be used in 3 ways to calculate expected deaths. (1) as average death in the reference years. (2) as average corrected for the change in total population. (3) as average for each age band corrected for its population, what we call age-adjusted.
We use 5 age bands.
3/7 (1) If D(i) is death in reference years i, then expected death in year c is E(c)=average[D(i)]. (2) If P(i) is population; E(c)=P(c)*average[D(i)/P(i)]. (3) If (P(i,j) is population of age band j in year i, D(i,j) the corresponding death; E(c,j)=P(c,j)*average[D(i,j)/P(i,j)]
Excess deaths are related to total all-cause deaths. While subject to recording delays, this number avoids all uncertainty about what caused death. Often reported each week, total death can be converted to excess by subtracting a baseline of the total number of deaths expected.
The baseline can be calculated as an average over earlier years or even simply be the totals for a different year. Deaths can be reported anywhere but a larger population makes numbers more certain. The total death is shown here for Europe (350 million) euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps.
Notice the winter flu peaks that are large in 2016/17 & 2017/18 but smaller in the next two years. There is also a large peak centered at Week 14 in 2020. This is due to COVID19. The excess death from COVID19 is the total number of deaths above the baseline for the entire period.
Here is my clearer analysis of the Population Fatality Rate (PFR) related to influential predictions by Ferguson et al. 2020. It use data released by the Chinese CDC on 14Apr20 @ChinaCDCWeekly, not full-text indexed by Google @Google but released in The @guardian on 1Mar20.
A perceptive reader will ask for the Verity et al., 2020 IFR. My 25Mar report to UK scientific leaders used that data. After normalization to percent, Verity IFR data is identical (0.6% RMSD) to deaths/Chinese_population in Col. F on Tweet1 Excel. My numbers are unchanged.