"Origins tracing terrorism"?? China apparently sees any attempt to understand where SARS-COV-2 comes from as "terrorism" (sic). This is either stupidity -not something one normally expects from China-, rank incompetence, gross dereliction of duty, or an avowal of responsibility.
Your choice. Note: China is emulating the Russian use of multiple & mutually incompatible narratives when things go wrong: 1) it can't be a lab leak; 2) it came from a lab leak (Ft Detrick,Busan); 3) origin was natural transmission from bats; 4) virus didn't come from an animal;
...5) origin is of great importance hence need to bring US, Italy, foreign frozen food etc to account); 6) any attempt to find origin is terrorism. 7) CCP guidance has conquered the virus and democratic regimes have failed; 8) Delta is a huge threat leading to new restrictions;
9) China is incredibly good at upstream and downstream tracing of cases (ie @globaltimesnews on the recent outbreak of Delta in Nanjing); 10) China still doesn't have a clue on the spread of SARS-COV-2 emergence in Wuhan, the world capital of virology. So it goes...
Questions. Does this approach mean that China's leadership doesn't give a fig for what others may make of CCP's conduct? Or does the CCP fear the political consequences of exposure of its responsibility in this biological Chernobyl?/.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with François Heisbourg

François Heisbourg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FHeisbourg

27 Jun
Initial reaction to French regional elections #electionsregionales2021 :
Winners:
1) all incumbent regional region heads are re-elected (all fm mainstream parties).
2) with strong wins by Bertrand (North) & Wauquiez (Lyon area), the mainstream Right has 2 strong potential...1/
...presidential candidates. But it will have to decide who will be the actual candidate in order to have a chance to beat Macron. Losers:
1) The extremes:
LePen's party does as poorly as last Sunday. The defeat is particularly stinging in the South. LePen is badly hurt as a...2/
presidential candidate. She may face a challenge from her right (Zemmour)
The hard left has cratered. In the Paris area, the merged list of the greens (Bayou), hard left (Autain), Socialists (Pulvar) did less well than in the 1st round. Bad for Mélenchon (19% in 2017) 3/
Read 6 tweets
20 Jun
Lots of losers in the French regional elex #electionsregionales2021 : ultra-low voter participation (32%); poor figures for Macron's lists; abysmal results for hard left, mostly divided left+greens. But in strategic terms:1) Le Pen's party has failed worst, below 2015 outcome. 1/
2) mainstream right (but not official LR) candidates Xavier Bertrand in the North & ValériePécresse (Paris region) did well, making each a strong right wing contender for the presidential race. The 2d round next Sunday race may yet confirm the current configuration of the...2/
...presidential race, ie 2 lead candidates with LePen enjoying a narrow lead in opinion polls in 1st round but Macron winning in 2d round. Call this Option1: this could happen if LePen's list wins or comes close to a winning triangular contest in South. But other options may...3/
Read 5 tweets
30 Mar
Notwithstanding Macron's use of the word, it never was an "alliance" in the sense that Russia would side with China against Vietnam in the SCS, or that China would support Russia in its Georgian or Ukrainian ventures. If it had tried to be, it would have broken down. 1/
It is a strategic partnership in which the two parties have free hands to do what they want to do (eg Russia in Crimea, China in SCS...). China benefits from access to Russian military know-how, energy and not having to worry about Russia siding with US "à la Mearsheimer" 2/
Russia has piece and quiet on its long Eastern border. Both bolster each other at the UN and have a framework for managing Central Asian issues. It's not frictionless nor competition-free. But it may well be more stable than a partnership among equals à la Hitler-Stalin: 3/
Read 5 tweets
9 Jan
PANDEMIC'S PROGRESS ( thread
1. GLOBAL: This is possibly the darkest moment up to now, with ca 16K daily deaths worldwide. At this rate the 2 million toll will be reached by mid January. Remember: undercounting is the norm
2. SEASONAL OR NOT? Much hope is placed in Europe,US 1/
...on pandemic's supposedly seasonal nature because of SARSCoV-2's propensity for cool temperatures. Fact is that in Brazil, it's definitely not winter & pandemic is running amok as badly as it did a few months ago, at +1K daily deaths, breaching 200 K level on 8 JAN. 2/
3. VARIANTS: B117 variant probably explains the pandemic's rampage in UK with +1.3K daily deaths. What is less clear is whether insufficiently detected B117 (and/or South African V2) outside of UK & RSA are already playing a role, or not, in pandemic's ongoing global surge. 3/
Read 8 tweets
29 Jun 20
My take on French municipal elections THREAD:
1) a resounding defeat of President's party: not a single victory of note by "En Marche!". This is a personal setback
2) conversely, the no less resounding victory by Macron's PM at Le Havre is a big problem for Prez who can... 1/5
...hardly fire such a popular figure; but with such a popular PM, the President will inevitably be cramped in a way which will weigh on 2022 elex. And of course, Édouard Philippe can jump ship.
3) massive abstention (close to 60%) is in part a reaction to Covid mismanagement: 2/5
electors were called to vote in 1st round on 15 March as pandemic was picking up; this was widely seen as an unnecessary risk which was duly punished at this deferred 2d round. But low participation is also a sign of deeper democratic crisis.
3/5
Read 5 tweets
8 Apr 20
THREAD 1/5 Superb report on UK much of which could be applied word-for-word to the pre-March French situation: Special Report: Johnson listened to his scientists about coronavirus - but they were slow to sound the alarm | Article [AMP] | Reuters reuters.com/article/us-hea…
Both countries have similar populations & centralised top-down healthcare systems. Both had well-developed pandemic plans (largely related to interhuman transmission of H5N1 avian flu). Having been involved on the French version, I agree with the assessment that these plans...2/4
...were close to what we have been going through. People who now say this couldn't have been foreseen are wrong: it was. But we failed to maintain adequate stocks of PPE (France built up a stockpile early on but didn't renew it) & both failed dismally in our testing strategy 3/4
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(