🧵1/ This thread is about a trend advocating for preventing Omar al-Bashir, wanted for crimes against humanity, from being sent to the ICC. It's a fantastic example of how artificially amplified and manipulated trends pretend to be grassroots sentiment #Disinformation#Sudan
2/ firstly, this shouldn't be taken lightly. The warrants against al-Bashir include the worst charges, from extermination, torture, and intentional targeting of civilians. Up to 500,000 are thought to have been killed as a result of the Darfur genocide (although figures vary).
3/ The trend translates as 'Surrending al-Bashir is an insult to Sudan'. It started trending on the evening of the 11th August. Then, @sabqorg an Arabic newspaper, ran a story about the trend saying it reflected 'popular (Gulf) outrage' about al-Bashir's plight #disinformation
4/ But is it really a reflection of popular outrage? Let's look in more detail at the hashtag. This analysis involves around 11,000 interactions taken from 11th-13th August involving around 7600 unique Twitter accounts. #disinformation#ICC#Sudan
5/ Firstly, who are the big influencers on the hashtag. Well it, seems they are the following, s_hm2030, a_albander, cressfiles, mjathlani, faljubairi, monther72, 5aldi Those who follow my threads may recognize these names. They are prominent on many dodgy gulf trends
6/ Now maybe many of those sharing this opinion genuinely believe it, though the narrative seems to be generally the same. It's a breach of state sovereignty and 'true Arabs' should reject this Western imposition of law/rules. In other words, Bashir should face justice in Sudan
7/ But can this same group of influencers, who often engage in fake trends, and many of whom recently weighed in on the Tunisia issue - really be misinterpreted as a good barometer for Arab public opinion? Well the manipulation present would indicate - no -Read on #disinformation
8/ The network graph below shows areas of manipulation (circled in red). These areas indicate clusters of fake accounts boosting the hashtag. They are defined by sockpuppet accounts all using the same app (Twitter Web App) to automatically RT a specific account #disinformation
9/ For example, The following community are accounts retweeting ANOTHER hacked verified account, this one belongs to @LeighEBuchanan the editor for @Inc magazine (who have over 2 million Twitter followers). It's been hacked by some mobile phone vendor in Saudi. Drop 'em a line!
11/ This cluster is similar, hundreds of sockpuppets retweeting marketing accounts advertising things like massages - also with Saudi whatsapp numbers. Check out the @TheChadSakada for a massage, and some Omar al-Bashir Spam! Total sockpuppets in the cluster, around 529. #disinfo
12/ Similarly, in this cluster there are around 144 sockpuppet accounts. Shout out to @steveknott020 whose interests include selling phones and Omar al-Bashir spam
13/ This is an interesting cluster, as it's embedded within the main network and retweeting what appears to be a real verified account mjathlani. I estimate this cluster to include between 300-358 sockpuppets. They mostly RT the same accounts and tweet generic content #disinfo
14/ So the TL;DR is that there around 1029 sockpuppets boosting the trend advocating not surrending al-Bashir to the ICC. It is unclear how many of these boosted trends are done by opportunistic marketing agencies, or they are enlisted to boost a trend. Some clearly are RT
15/ certain messages in a way that appears to be to increase the prominence of the hashtag. Generally though, the same group of influencers we often see on disinfo trends appear to be very prominent. The Cressfiles account is an interesting one. A related incarnation
16/ Cresstove was suspended by Twitter soon after it was active in a big disinformation campaign. Anyway, While @sabqorg report this as public opinion, at least 14% are sockpuppets, and I'll wager this trend reflects top-down policy (even if many agree). #disinformation
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ THREAD: On populist gaslighting and the war on truth-tellers 🧵
2/ Something concerning is happening in our information ecosystem: populists aren't just spreading misinfo, they're systematically trying to undermine the very concept of verifiable truth
3/ When fact-checkers or experts present evidence contradicting false claims, they get labeled as "elitist manipulators" or 'censors' - effectively inverting reality
🧵 THREAD: Meta's disturbing new "free speech" announcement is a masterclass in how platforms enable digital harm under the guise of freedom 1/9 theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Meta announces it's getting rid of factcheckers & "restrictions" on gender/immigration content. This isn't about free speech - it's about platforming hate & disinformation under the guise of "mainstream discourse" 2/9
Key red flags: ❗️❗️❗️
Moving content teams to Texas "for less bias" (read: political motivation)
Replacing factcheckers with "community notes"
Framing basic content moderation as "censorship" 3/9
1/ 🧵This graph shows X posts by impressions in the first six hours after the Magdeburg attack. Specifically these are posts falsely attributing the attack to an Islamist terror attack or a Syrian, or using it as an opportunity to attack immigration or muslims #disinformation
2/ The usual suspects are there - that is, the anti-Islam disinfluencers (routine spreaders of disinformation). As you can see, one of the most widely viewed is @visegrad24 - who shared at least 6 posts falsely claiming the attacker was an Islamist
3/ The posts falsely claiming that the attacker was a Muslim or Islamist gained at least 38,000,000 views. False claims that he was Syrian resulted in around 8.4million views (remember this is just an approx 6 hour period).
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.