Bharat is not a Dharamshala.The priority must be to save Indic communities. It has to & must look out for itself first. It can't endanger its already precarious demographic balance to please the gallery & win empty humanitarian accolades. It can provide material aid & that's all.
Here's is an interesting exchange from Shri Chandraprakash Dwivedi's Chanakya on accommodating refugees citing "athithi devo bhava" because the problem is they won't be merely athithis for long -
Americans & Pakistanis have created this mess in Afghanistan. It is for them to clean it up,not Bharat.Demographic inversion is already a reality in several parts of Bharat & the Indian State shudnt worsen this situation. Only Indic communities are an exception to this position.
The Taliban isn't an airdropped group from the heavens. It has come from within d Afghan society with support from Pakistan and *elsewhere*.So don't let perpetually bleeding hearts guilt you into endangering Bharat & our future. Bharat's priority is its civilizational interest.
They will start candle light marches at Jantar Mantar,get tailor made op-eds published in Indian and foreign portals,and resort to all sorts of mushy exhortations. It is for us to be clear about our priorities & interests.Nobel Peace Prizes & praise from d West count for nothing.
The scope of d CAA must not be allowed to be expanded to include any other group other than d groups already mentioned. US every other nation that sent its troops to fight the US's war can and must open its doors for Afghan refugees.Bharat must protect Indic communities.Period.
If the Indian State still doesn't draw the right lessons from Kashmir, Bengal, Assam, Kerala, Lakshwadeep, and the Rohingya concentration in various parts of Bharat, it means the State has effectively chosen to hit the self-destruct button & has abandoned Indic communities.
What applies to Assam in the context of preserving its cultural identity equally applies to Bharat's civilisational identity as a country, especially in the context of influx of a group that could alter Bharat’s precarious demographic balance.
I have zero interest in entertaining arguments like "but there is a masterstroke at play here which mere mortals can't understand".My response to them is- take a hike.Bharat is not even a middling power today, so let it not operate under grandiose delusions of a moral obligation.
Bharat’s only moral & civilisational obligation is to provide sanctuary to Indic communities,and material humanitarian aid to non-Indic communities.There is no need to turn the country into Lajpat Nagar. It's time that ppl put civilisational interest over any other interest.
All those Islamic Republics, Emirates and Kingdoms which recognised the Taliban Government of 1996, and those who are currently open to recognising a Taliban-led Afghan Government should open their doors to non-Indic Afghan refugees. Bharat need not and should not.
Bharat must formally ask the Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC) to step in to address the refugee problem. After all, that organisation is most interested in looking out for the interests of the Ummah. Let it walk the talk and put its money where its mouth is.
If Bharat really wishes to become even a regional power, let alone superpower, it must stop pussy footing around these issues and understand the value and importance of realpolitik. Smaller countries do better than Bharat in this regard, and that's seriously unfortunate.
It's not enough to casually throw words like "civilisation-state".It *must* translate to concrete vision and policy-making.For me,the Afghan situation is certainly a test of the Indian State's commitment to preserving its civilisational interest under the current dispensation.
A country which cannot get hard-nosed about its civilizational interests and existential priorities shouldn't labour under delusions of becoming a Vishwaguru. Clarity in vision and a sense of purpose are the first steps to getting a seat at the high-table of global powers.
To be clear,I am not running down the aspiration of becoming a Vishwaguru.I welcome it.But my limited point is,if u r serious about it,demonstrate it by squaring up to realities.Consolidation of d Indic position at all levels is d only way to give effect to d Vishwaguru vision.
The most important lesson to be drawn on #PartitionHorrorsRemembranceDay is #NeverAgain should we encourage or contribute to those factors and conditions which led to the Partition and loss of sacred civilisational space and genocide of Indic communities.
On d eve of d 74th #IndependenceDay,I genuinely believe tht Bharat has turned d corner since 2014 on quite a few important fronts.But d most important front where a lot more needs to b done is d civilisational front.I hope V get our act together bfore it's too late.Vande Mataram.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. This is an appreciation thread for @rahulroushan and @UnSubtleDesi for launching @hinduphobia_tr,a much-needed documentation portal that catalogues atrocities against Hindus in as rigorous a manner as possible,something that only @UnSubtleDesi could have put together.
2.I have known Nupur for close to 9 years now.She's one of my dearest friends whose passion to work for the cause of Dharma is brilliantly complemented by her ability to commit herself to solid work. Not many are aware of the price she has personally paid for her Dharmic work.
3. She was forced to leave Mamata's Bengal after the 2021 post-poll violence & her best work,according to me,has come *after* that traumatic experience.The brilliant reportage of the Delhi Riots case, preparation of the dossier on Wikipedia, & now the launch of @hinduphobia_tr
1. In this thread,I will share whatever mails/messages I have received from #BangladeshiHindus without revealing their identities. Pls consider sharing this thread widely so that the world knows the terror they live in & how "healing" isn't remotely in their foreseeable future.
2. Read
3. Put yourself in the shoes of a #BangladeshiHindu parent and read this mail.
1. Why are certain "Kalpo"nik anonymous handles sharing only the case title instead of the link to the entire order in which I appeared as the arguing counsel for Puja Dileeprao Khedkar in 2020? Here's why. Link to the complete order - indiankanoon.org/doc/90472983/
2. I appeared as the arguing counsel in a petition relating to her representation to the UPSC seeking copies of her answer sheet in 2020 after she had *failed* to clear the prelims. The Petition I appeared in had nothing to do her with caste or disability certificates.
3. Neither her disability nor caste certificates were the subject of the Petition I appeared in. That was an altogether different Petition which she appears to have filed separately. I am sure the mischievous "Kalpo"niks could have found this out through a simple Google search.
1. As the day ends & the dust of election settles,I think,despite the losses,congratulations are in order to the BJP-led NDA for having the numbers to form a government for the 3rd consecutive time.All said & done,what could have been a Panipat was averted with a close shave.
2. As of this tweet, this is the final position. Come to think of it, but for UP, Rajasthan and Bengal, these numbers speak a lot but not enough. After all, numbers don't tell the entire story in my limited view as a layperson in the realm of psephology.
3. I don't have the resources or the first-hand knowledge to distill the reasons for the outcome. With this caveat, I will air a few general expectations which, in my view, are legitimate and reasonable. Whether they led to the outcome or not is for stakeholders to decide.
I will :-) Unsurprisingly,they are latching on to d edited title instead of responding to the contents of the 4 articles I have written thus far on the subject. At least 6 pieces on Dravidianism are in d pipeline. I expect a lot more whining from Periyarites and Blue Rageboys :-)
Late last yr,I appeared virtually from Delhi before d Madras HC for an Intervenor in d Udhayanidhi Stalin hate speech case. By then,I had started publishing d series on d anti-Dharmic origins of Dravidianism after Udhayanidhi Stalin's speech. Here's what happened in open Court.
The entire defense of Periyarites defending Udhayanidhi Stalin's hate speech against Sanatana Dharma was that his statement was fully covered by permissible free speech under d Constitution. So asking for eradication of Sanatana Dharma,according to them,was protected free speech.
@KhalidBaig85, I am not at all surprised at your disagreement.If u recollect,in my conversation with Amana ji & u,I had clearly said that reclamation isn't limited to Kashi & Mathura.Since both of u are so keen to get Hindus to support the Pasmanda Muslim cause,here's a thought.
The PoW Act expressly states that it doesn't prevent parties from a peaceful return of occupied sites through a mutual settlement. Since you are so concerned about confrontation,why can't you encourage the Pasmandas to support the Hindu case for return of occupied Hindu sites?
That way,acrimonious litigation in Courts & the confrontation you apprehend can also be avoided.And the claim that the Pasmandas r different from Ashrafs in their perception of Bharat’s history becomes credible. In any case,how can u justify continued occupation of Hindu sites?