One of my core thesis for $Etsy is their ability to scale the brand in international markets. Building two-sided marketplace is not easy, but to do it in multiple countries is even more difficult.
But Etsy might just pull it off.
2/ In 2Q’20, international was 32% of total GMS. In 2Q’21, it reached 41%.
Important to remember how Etsy defines international. If either buyer or seller is outside the US, it is considered international.
3/ When both buyer and seller is in the same country outside the US, that’s considered “domestic international”.
In 1Q’21, Etsy mentioned “International domestic” GMS grew 2x faster than overall revenue.
4/ Outside of the US, Etsy identifies 6 other countries as core markets: Canada, UK, Australia, Germany, France, and India.
“What are your favorite places to shop online?” Etsy is now among the top 10 in the US and UK. Etsy wants to replicate this in multiple countries.
5/ When Etsy felt its brand may not have the power to have a bite in Brazil, they acquired Elo7.
6/ The focus on international is evident by management’s willingness to not care about short-term margins.
7/ Interestingly, apart from $AMZN, none of the other US retailers/marketplaces have any focus on international markets.
It is quite revealing when you look at internet traffic in top 6 marketplaces over the last 3 years.
8/ Let’s first look at the US.
Please note I've defined “market” as top 6 retailers/marketplaces in the US. An important missing piece here is $SHOP stores.
$AMZN and $EBAY lost 200-300 bps market share to others in last 3 years in the US. Thanks to @Similarweb for the data.
9/ International is much more interesting.
$EBAY is losing relevance in international market much faster, and it appears other than $ETSY and $AMZN, others are not interested in international markets.
Again, thanks to @similarweb for giving me access to the data.
10/ Of course, international markets have their own platforms/marketplaces/retailers which are not being captured in the traffic market share data, so don’t confuse this with their actual market share in international markets.
11/ One of the reasons Etsy’s potentials in international market is underappreciated is how analysts model a company such as Etsy.
Analysts, including myself, project GMS based on # of sellers/buyers and GMS per seller/buyer. Forecasting based on geography is very difficult.
12/ It is tempting to fade # of buyers/sellers growth quickly while projecting in the future, but if Etsy can continue to penetrate international markets, our models may fail to capture that underlying long growth runway for Etsy in the international markets.
I started investing in 2013. Not in the US, but in Bangladesh.
Bangladesh market reached a stratospheric level in 2010 which is yet to be crossed after 11 years. The index is still ~20% below 2010 peak.
2/ I was a Senior in college in 2013 and decided to major in Finance. I thought I should get into investing.
When I started, the market experienced ~60% drawdown. Even though I had no clue what I was doing, it was hard to go wrong when you invest in such a market.
3/ After graduation, I got a job in research which definitely helped me understand investing a bit better.
Bangladesh market is almost entirely driven by retail investors as institutional investor base is pretty weak. In fact, most institutional investors behave like retail.
Another decent quarter, but FCF guidance for full year is slightly softer than earlier which perhaps led the stock to ~7% decline in AH. But after listening to the call, any potential concern related to FCF should evaporate.
Here are my notes.
2/ Revenue met high end of the guidance for the quarter. Low end of the topline guidance for the full year was increased, and so did margins.
But as mentioned earlier, FCF mid-point guidance for FY decreased from $1.61 Bn to $1.54 Bn.
3/ Why did FCF guidance fall?
ADSK used to have multi-year Enterprise Business Agreement (EBA) for which they would get paid cash upfront, but in exchange EBAs would receive ~10% discount.
ADSK is still doing multi-year EBAs, but switching to annual billings, so less cash...
“It isn’t that I don’t understand software products, but I don’t know how that industry is going to develop over 10 or 20 years… so anything that’s rapidly developing that has lots of change embodied in it, by my definition, I won’t understand.”
2/ Two companies that I recently studied ( $CRWD and $ROKU) reminded me of that Buffett quote.
Both are run by founders, have executed incredibly well over last few years and enjoyed secular tailwinds on their back. They were nimble, aggressive, and eating incumbents’ share.
3/ Both companies are valued in a way that assumes they will coast through the next 5-10 years.
But when you look at the rate of change in their respective industries, it makes you think whether such assumptions will indeed hold.
I was listening to ILtB's episode with Sridhar who played instrumental role in Google's Search success, and is now building Neeva, a subscription based private search product.
As a $GOOG shareholder, I was curious and here's my notes.
2/ In 1Q'21 earnings call, Philipp Schindler explained drivers of search:
I. Number of queries
II. Percentage of queries that have commercial potential
III. Click-through rates
IV. Cost Per Click (CPC)
Sridhar condensed it further: volume of clicks multiplied by CPC
3/ "It turns out that persuading people to query more is next to impossible. All of us have a certain propensity to use search, and it varies from person to person."