I started investing in 2013. Not in the US, but in Bangladesh.
Bangladesh market reached a stratospheric level in 2010 which is yet to be crossed after 11 years. The index is still ~20% below 2010 peak.
2/ I was a Senior in college in 2013 and decided to major in Finance. I thought I should get into investing.
When I started, the market experienced ~60% drawdown. Even though I had no clue what I was doing, it was hard to go wrong when you invest in such a market.
3/ After graduation, I got a job in research which definitely helped me understand investing a bit better.
Bangladesh market is almost entirely driven by retail investors as institutional investor base is pretty weak. In fact, most institutional investors behave like retail.
4/ While it's not easy to beat the index in the US, even the worst fund managers beat the index in Bangladesh since the index is filled with crappy companies.
In hindsight, it probably was the easiest market to start investing I could ever ask for, especially given ~60% drawdown
5/ Bangladeshis cannot invest outside Bangladesh, so it wasn't a choice that I made.
In US standard, I was earning peanuts, but saved a lot, and made enough money in the mkt after ~3 years that could afford me living expense in the US for 2 years. Broad market was choppy but up.
6/ In 2017, I moved to the US for MBA. A year later when I got my SSN, I finally started investing in the US in 3Q'18.
4Q'18 was tough as a newbie in the market and I started asking question whether it was too big a leap from Bangladesh to the US.
7/ And then it all became "easy" again, thanks to the bull market in the US.
Covid's bear market was over even before I could feel anything.
So you see, for better or worse, I have mostly invested during bull markets. While that's fortunate, it is also not quite comforting.
8/ Without facing an extended bear market, risk has become mostly a theoretical question for me. Of course, it will happen eventually although no idea when.
I spend a lot of time thinking about risk: how to respond and what not to do etc.
9/ One of the things that have deeply influenced me how I think about risk is this Morgan Housel presentation: "What Other Industries Teach Us About Investing"
10/ Housel talks about how you experience the market in your teens and 20s will leave a deep imprint on your psyche as an investor.
11/ Housel quoted Eisenhower to explain what Eisenhower thought military genius was: "the man who can do the average thing when everyone else is losing his mind"
"You don't have to have to make a lot of great decisions in investing, you just have to not screw up when it matters"
12/ What that speech truly taught me is risk is deeply personal. No degree/certificate can teach you how to think about risk.
Your individual experiences will shape you in a way that may not be easy to alter. But being *aware* of your own experience can help.
End/ My personal background, family, culture, life experiences will lead me to behave in a way that will never be captured in a formula.
I will know what and how I do when I experience it. The greatest joy of investing is you get to know yourself better.
Have a good weekend!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Another decent quarter, but FCF guidance for full year is slightly softer than earlier which perhaps led the stock to ~7% decline in AH. But after listening to the call, any potential concern related to FCF should evaporate.
Here are my notes.
2/ Revenue met high end of the guidance for the quarter. Low end of the topline guidance for the full year was increased, and so did margins.
But as mentioned earlier, FCF mid-point guidance for FY decreased from $1.61 Bn to $1.54 Bn.
3/ Why did FCF guidance fall?
ADSK used to have multi-year Enterprise Business Agreement (EBA) for which they would get paid cash upfront, but in exchange EBAs would receive ~10% discount.
ADSK is still doing multi-year EBAs, but switching to annual billings, so less cash...
“It isn’t that I don’t understand software products, but I don’t know how that industry is going to develop over 10 or 20 years… so anything that’s rapidly developing that has lots of change embodied in it, by my definition, I won’t understand.”
2/ Two companies that I recently studied ( $CRWD and $ROKU) reminded me of that Buffett quote.
Both are run by founders, have executed incredibly well over last few years and enjoyed secular tailwinds on their back. They were nimble, aggressive, and eating incumbents’ share.
3/ Both companies are valued in a way that assumes they will coast through the next 5-10 years.
But when you look at the rate of change in their respective industries, it makes you think whether such assumptions will indeed hold.
One of my core thesis for $Etsy is their ability to scale the brand in international markets. Building two-sided marketplace is not easy, but to do it in multiple countries is even more difficult.
But Etsy might just pull it off.
2/ In 2Q’20, international was 32% of total GMS. In 2Q’21, it reached 41%.
Important to remember how Etsy defines international. If either buyer or seller is outside the US, it is considered international.
3/ When both buyer and seller is in the same country outside the US, that’s considered “domestic international”.
In 1Q’21, Etsy mentioned “International domestic” GMS grew 2x faster than overall revenue.
I was listening to ILtB's episode with Sridhar who played instrumental role in Google's Search success, and is now building Neeva, a subscription based private search product.
As a $GOOG shareholder, I was curious and here's my notes.
2/ In 1Q'21 earnings call, Philipp Schindler explained drivers of search:
I. Number of queries
II. Percentage of queries that have commercial potential
III. Click-through rates
IV. Cost Per Click (CPC)
Sridhar condensed it further: volume of clicks multiplied by CPC
3/ "It turns out that persuading people to query more is next to impossible. All of us have a certain propensity to use search, and it varies from person to person."