Curiously, on the FCA's site...it does state that, "This firm is authorised for specific activities and product types" (doesn't specify what those are)
4/ Scrolling further down on that site, there's additional information about @Binance.
Honestly shocked that @binance was somehow able to resolve w/e issues they had with the FCA in less than two months...
5/ Let's not forget that @Binance literally could not obtain *any* banking in the UK just *two* short months ago.
HSBC, Santander, NatWest *and* Barclays all announced they were dropping @Binance as a client *last month!*
6/ What's even crazier is that @Binance reinstated their GBP deposits *and* withdrawals yesterday (Aug. 25th, 2021).
How has @Binance managed to slide under the radar with this? No matter - let's continue on.
7/ Going back to that FCA compliance check page - let's see what "restrictions" are imposed on the @Binance UK entity (if any at all).
7a/ Appears the first stipulation states @binance can't operate as a fractional reserve. Meh - nothing.
8/ Here's the other stipulation imposed on @Binance
Essentially just restricts them from 'promoting' or 'accepting' "any new applications for lending by retail customers through the operation of its Electronic Lending System" (?)
9/ Moving further along here, there's a section titled, 'Activities and services' where the FCA claims to provide greater info about what "regulated activities...this firm has FCA and/or PRA permission to provide" (among other info)
9a/ Expanding from there, a list of 9 individuals whom (don't expect to find them all in these four pictures ; this information can be extracted easily from the FCA's site though.
10/ Curiously, it appears that @binance is still allowed to operate in 'Gibraltar', specifically.
11/ Since we're here, we might as well be thorough! Let's check out who @Binance is "connected to" (according to the FCA).
Their records currently identify:
- Arch Emerging Markets Partner Ltd.
- ViCoHo Reg. Services Ltd.
12/ Last but not least, we can see that the FCA has been the sole overseers of @Binance's fate
FCA's final action on @binance seems ridiculously light when considering the fact that the exchange nearly lost *all* of its banking partners over the past two months alone.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This thread will prove that there is *nothing* unique about NFTs (at all).
2/ To start with, the claim that "100% of the proceeds" are going to charity is patently false.
Only the "royalties" from secondary sales (i.e., when the auction winner later sells the NFT), will be donated to charity (Mamba & Mambacita Foundation)
2a/ Also, in case you missed it in the previous tweet, "Alastra said Cryptograph has been in touch with Bryant's camp, but the effort is not an official partnership with Bryant's trust."
1/ I published a public comment for BIP340 a few months ago on the official Bitcoin GitHub
After publishing said comment, it was later removed (censored) by Gregory Maxwell (@Blockstream CTO "formerly"; listed as a co-founder of @Blockstream as well).
As screenshots, what I wrote was comprehensive, to the point + included numerous references to published (peer-reviewed)
3/ Before getting into all of that, let me address Gregory Maxwell's claim that my comment was "linked elsewhere while the comments below are ignored"; this is actually false.
2/ @Blockstream, founded by @adam3us is the primary firm responsible for Bitcoin and LN's development (picture here proves the LN statement; next tweet proves the BTC dev. statement)
1/ So the other day, a thread was started on here that proposed that @binance and their derivatives are potentially a major catalyst for the printing of $USDT.
Many laughed & dismissed this, so this thread will prove those people wrong (empirically) with verifiable fact.
1a/ To be clear, this entire thread is operating from the understood premise that Tether is a fraud, full-stop. Whatever is in their "reserves" is irrelevant to this conversation because its clear none of it is legally derived.
If you disagree, stop reading. Thanks.
2/ Many have stated that the core purpose of Tether is to simply pump the Bitcoin markets.
In other words, someone wakes up, scratches their ass - yawns, and says..."Hmm. Let's rocket Bitcoin up another $5k".
This is not the case (nor is it responsible for price pumps).
4a/ The burden of running an archival node was made painfully clear in a bombshell post by @BlockCypher back in May 2019 following the Constantinople hard fork