1/ Finance Magnates reported yesterday that "UK Regulator Said Crypto Exchange Binance is Now Compliant"

Here's the link to that - financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency…

Won't lie, I was skeptical at first - but appears there's some credence to this headline.
2/ Cutting to the chase here - let's revisit the original notice the FCA published against @Binance on June 25th, 2021.

If you look closely, you'll notice the press release was last updated August 25th, 2021 (yesterday).
3/ Let's check out the 'FCA Register' for 'Binance Markets Ltd.' first (via the FCA's registry) - register.fca.org.uk/s/firm?id=001b…

Curiously, on the FCA's site...it does state that, "This firm is authorised for specific activities and product types" (doesn't specify what those are)
4/ Scrolling further down on that site, there's additional information about @Binance.

Honestly shocked that @binance was somehow able to resolve w/e issues they had with the FCA in less than two months...
5/ Let's not forget that @Binance literally could not obtain *any* banking in the UK just *two* short months ago.

HSBC, Santander, NatWest *and* Barclays all announced they were dropping @Binance as a client *last month!*
6/ What's even crazier is that @Binance reinstated their GBP deposits *and* withdrawals yesterday (Aug. 25th, 2021).

How has @Binance managed to slide under the radar with this? No matter - let's continue on.
7/ Going back to that FCA compliance check page - let's see what "restrictions" are imposed on the @Binance UK entity (if any at all).
7a/ Appears the first stipulation states @binance can't operate as a fractional reserve. Meh - nothing.
8/ Here's the other stipulation imposed on @Binance

Essentially just restricts them from 'promoting' or 'accepting' "any new applications for lending by retail customers through the operation of its Electronic Lending System" (?)
9/ Moving further along here, there's a section titled, 'Activities and services' where the FCA claims to provide greater info about what "regulated activities...this firm has FCA and/or PRA permission to provide" (among other info)
9a/ Expanding from there, a list of 9 individuals whom (don't expect to find them all in these four pictures ; this information can be extracted easily from the FCA's site though.
10/ Curiously, it appears that @binance is still allowed to operate in 'Gibraltar', specifically.
11/ Since we're here, we might as well be thorough! Let's check out who @Binance is "connected to" (according to the FCA).

Their records currently identify:

- Arch Emerging Markets Partner Ltd.

- ViCoHo Reg. Services Ltd.
12/ Last but not least, we can see that the FCA has been the sole overseers of @Binance's fate

FCA's final action on @binance seems ridiculously light when considering the fact that the exchange nearly lost *all* of its banking partners over the past two months alone.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Edwards

James Edwards Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @librehash

28 Aug
1/ Saw a promo for "Kobe NFTs" in an ESPN article and felt compelled to expose these NFTs for the fraud they really are.

espn.com/nba/story/_/id…

This thread will prove that there is *nothing* unique about NFTs (at all).
2/ To start with, the claim that "100% of the proceeds" are going to charity is patently false.

Only the "royalties" from secondary sales (i.e., when the auction winner later sells the NFT), will be donated to charity (Mamba & Mambacita Foundation)
2a/ Also, in case you missed it in the previous tweet, "Alastra said Cryptograph has been in touch with Bryant's camp, but the effort is not an official partnership with Bryant's trust."
Read 16 tweets
25 Aug
1/ I published a public comment for BIP340 a few months ago on the official Bitcoin GitHub

After publishing said comment, it was later removed (censored) by Gregory Maxwell (@Blockstream CTO "formerly"; listed as a co-founder of @Blockstream as well).

github.com/bitcoin/bips/b… ImageImage
2/ To start off, what Gregory Maxwell wrote is a demonstrable lie - full stop.

You can view my original comment here - github.com/bitcoin/bips/w…

As screenshots, what I wrote was comprehensive, to the point + included numerous references to published (peer-reviewed) ImageImageImage
3/ Before getting into all of that, let me address Gregory Maxwell's claim that my comment was "linked elsewhere while the comments below are ignored"; this is actually false. Image
Read 22 tweets
25 Aug
1/ Going to quickly outline for everyone why this is extremely concerning if you care (at all) about Bitcoin's ecosystem.

This thread is a must-read.
2/ @Blockstream, founded by @adam3us is the primary firm responsible for Bitcoin and LN's development (picture here proves the LN statement; next tweet proves the BTC dev. statement)

veriphi.io/en/blog/a-brie… Image
3/ Attached to this tweet are screens from Mosaic Ventures' (investor) website

"Out of 200ish committers in total, just a small number...working quasi-independently, are responsibnle for the *vast majority of code commits*."

mosaicventures.com/patterns/our-i… [published 2014] ImageImage
Read 23 tweets
22 Jun
1/ So the other day, a thread was started on here that proposed that @binance and their derivatives are potentially a major catalyst for the printing of $USDT.

Many laughed & dismissed this, so this thread will prove those people wrong (empirically) with verifiable fact.
1a/ To be clear, this entire thread is operating from the understood premise that Tether is a fraud, full-stop. Whatever is in their "reserves" is irrelevant to this conversation because its clear none of it is legally derived.

If you disagree, stop reading. Thanks.
2/ Many have stated that the core purpose of Tether is to simply pump the Bitcoin markets.

In other words, someone wakes up, scratches their ass - yawns, and says..."Hmm. Let's rocket Bitcoin up another $5k".

This is not the case (nor is it responsible for price pumps).
Read 14 tweets
31 May
1/ Tether isn't burning any of the USDT that its sending to the "burn address" on Tron.

TRC20 USDT smart contract = TR7NHqjeKQxGTCi8q8ZY4pL8otSzgjLj6t

"Burn" address = T9yD14Nj9j7xAB4dbGeiX9h8unkKHxuWwb

Treasury = THPvaUhoh2Qn2y9THCZML3H815hhFhn5YC
2/ We first became aware of the true identities of these addresses in a public way when Paolo "accidentally" minted 5B USDT to the Treasury address.

3/ From that point, @paoloardoino provided the transactions for the alleged burn -
Read 8 tweets
3 Apr
2/ The reason for this is rooted in archival nodes.

For those that don't know, a full node in blockchain is *required* for *trustless* validation of the blockchain.

Without one, you will inevitably be forced to trust the word of some 3rd-party intermediary
3/ The problem the $ETH ecosystem is facing (beyond gas fees) is the growing burden of running an $ETH archival node (full node).

Right now, a full archival node requires approx. 7 TB of space.

That's 1 TB of growth in just 4.5 months. +3 TB < 1 year

etherscan.io/chartsync/chai…
4a/ The burden of running an archival node was made painfully clear in a bombshell post by @BlockCypher back in May 2019 following the Constantinople hard fork

blog.blockcypher.com/ethereum-woes-…
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(