This thread will prove that there is *nothing* unique about NFTs (at all).
2/ To start with, the claim that "100% of the proceeds" are going to charity is patently false.
Only the "royalties" from secondary sales (i.e., when the auction winner later sells the NFT), will be donated to charity (Mamba & Mambacita Foundation)
2a/ Also, in case you missed it in the previous tweet, "Alastra said Cryptograph has been in touch with Bryant's camp, but the effort is not an official partnership with Bryant's trust."
3/ Moving on to the point - let's go check out these "unique" NFTs they're talking about.
7/ Let's check the keccak256 hash of the video we downloaded.
Attached to this tweet is a GIF of me uploading the video (I saved from the website) to this site - emn178.github.io/online-tools/k…
It shows that the hashes match.
7a/ In case you can't see the GIF above, here's a picture showing the checksum hash of the NFT.
Looks like it matches the one they gave under the authenticity.
8/ Let me double back to something I said in post #4a. I originally grabbed the Kobe NFT video (30 seconds), 2-3 days ago.
Then I published all of this information in the official Telegram (t.me/librehash)
9/ However, if you revisit the page now and right click the media, you'll see the video is only *5 seconds* (which means they swapped out the media).
I found that curious.
10/ For curiosity's sake, I decided to save the video under the name 'truncated_kobevideo.mp4'.
Then I used the same tool from before to derive the keccak256 checksum hash of the video.
This one ended up being *different*.
11/ So it is *possible* that after I publicly posted about this a couple of days ago that these guys saw my post and then swapped the media out on their NFT page so that nobody could repeat the steps I showed.
12/ Who knows! Either way, if anyone wants the original NFT again, go ahead and visit that site where I hosted the video at & download it.
Curiously, on the FCA's site...it does state that, "This firm is authorised for specific activities and product types" (doesn't specify what those are)
1/ I published a public comment for BIP340 a few months ago on the official Bitcoin GitHub
After publishing said comment, it was later removed (censored) by Gregory Maxwell (@Blockstream CTO "formerly"; listed as a co-founder of @Blockstream as well).
As screenshots, what I wrote was comprehensive, to the point + included numerous references to published (peer-reviewed)
3/ Before getting into all of that, let me address Gregory Maxwell's claim that my comment was "linked elsewhere while the comments below are ignored"; this is actually false.
2/ @Blockstream, founded by @adam3us is the primary firm responsible for Bitcoin and LN's development (picture here proves the LN statement; next tweet proves the BTC dev. statement)
1/ So the other day, a thread was started on here that proposed that @binance and their derivatives are potentially a major catalyst for the printing of $USDT.
Many laughed & dismissed this, so this thread will prove those people wrong (empirically) with verifiable fact.
1a/ To be clear, this entire thread is operating from the understood premise that Tether is a fraud, full-stop. Whatever is in their "reserves" is irrelevant to this conversation because its clear none of it is legally derived.
If you disagree, stop reading. Thanks.
2/ Many have stated that the core purpose of Tether is to simply pump the Bitcoin markets.
In other words, someone wakes up, scratches their ass - yawns, and says..."Hmm. Let's rocket Bitcoin up another $5k".
This is not the case (nor is it responsible for price pumps).
4a/ The burden of running an archival node was made painfully clear in a bombshell post by @BlockCypher back in May 2019 following the Constantinople hard fork