Right, so the most frightening aspect of this excellent piece from @d_spiegel is the increasing numbers of pregnant/recently pregnant women, with disproportionate numbers from minority ethnic groups, being treated in ICU for COVID.

Why is this happening?

amp.theguardian.com/theobserver/co…
Well, it may be complicated, but I strongly suspect that the poisonous, insidious and completely untrue rumours spread by horrendous anti-vax morons including Michael (racist, amongst other things) Yeadon have played a massive role here...

Whenever I engage on vax hesitancy, I
hear genuinely concerned young women reluctant to get the jab because they're worried by the 💩 that people like Yeadon have spread. Who can blame them? People like Yeadon use their past credentials (however much their present actions/views completely invalidate them) and a blend
of half-truths, "facts" taken completely out of context, outright lies and conspiracy, then blend them with biological impossibilities and misuse of terms such that even an alien who landed last night, drunk, would be able to correct them regarding human physiology.

So, what has
Yeadon, and others, been saying?

First, we know from multiple studies and the sheer number of vaccinees that have had babies safely that mRNA vax carries no risk whatsoever during pregnancy. @VikiLovesFACS summarises this regularly and does a far better job than I could.
What
really ISN'T safe during pregnancy is COVID, especially during the third trimester - increased risk of premature or still birth, and admissions to neonatal ICU. Also major risk to mother, not least blood clots etc.

Second, fertility...
Yeadon stated that SARS2 spike, the target
of all licensed vax except killed virus, harbours an identical, overlapping sequence of amino acids as found in a protein made in the placenta called syncytin 1. Its job is to help the placenta form its specialised blood vessels as it embeds within the uterus. Pretty important!
Thus, Yeadon said that the COVID vax will immunise you against your own placenta, which you'd therefore reject leading to miscarriage...

Scary stuff...imagine having difficulty conceiving and then hearing this as you're invited for your vaccine?

Thankfully, it's a huge pile of
First, before I briefly explain why, remember countless 1000s of women have already conceived after their vaccines. We have not become infertile in the UK (there's a male infertility scare story as well, but really not worth my thumb moving).

OK, so, as above, this lie is based
on a "fact" taken out of context...there IS indeed an identical run of amino acids between spike and syncytin of 4 or 5 amino acids...
BUT THIS CAN NEVER CAUSE YOU TO REJECT YOUR PLACENTA!
Here's why...and I should add that @andrew_croxford did a wonderful thread on this back in 2020 as well with actual numbers and sciency bits, do check it out.

First, you will find myriad examples of this type of short identical amino acid sequence throughout many of the proteins
within our bodies. This occurs because all proteins - we make somewhere over 20k in each cell of our body - are made of strings of the same 20 amino acids, ie our genetic code is relatively simple. Thus, as proteins can comprise many hundreds of amino acids, short regions of
identity are really VERY common indeed. Hence, if Yeadon is right, you'd actually immunise yourself against huge numbers of your own proteins, nevermind syncytin, and probably suffer a short but agonising death as your immune system destroyed your tissues.

Of course, this does
NOT happen. This is because our immune systems actually work within a natural context, defined by our genetics...duh!

In short, our white blood cells - T cells (footsoldiers that recognise infected cells) and B cells (antibody production, bit like artillery), are exquisitely
programmed to take action ONLY when they are shown a FOREIGN protein fragment of AT LEAST 8 or 9 amino acids, sometimes more. I.E. nature isn't stupid.

Also, these precision weapons require other safety checks before they're activated and around birth all of the cells that can
react against proteins in our own bodies are deleted.

So, our immune systems can neither perceive Yeadon's overlap sequence, nor possess the weapons to act against it...plus, the sequence is all over our protein repertoire...

I'm continually amazed that morons like Yeadon
continue to attack vaccines, when they're the only way through a pandemic that they think should be over...feet and shooting yourself spring to mind. @STWorg has brilliant insight as to perhaps why...

Lastly, if anyone is unaware of the sort of poison that Yeadon spreads, he's
thankfully no longer on twitter, but can be found spouting turds such as the link below from his mouth...

#VaccinesWork

archive.is/bpauI

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Griffin

Stephen Griffin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SGriffin_Lab

21 Aug
No, absolutely not.
Whilst this model may conceivably apply in the future, in my view this ignores some key issues.

1. This is a novel virus and we don't understand it yet.
2. Long COVID is HUGE

BBC News - Is catching Covid now better than more vaccine?
bbc.co.uk/news/health-58…
3. We know infection, even in vaccinees can leave tissues damaged. We don't understand this yet either.
4. We aren't used to dealing with virus pandemics, where the sheer scale of infection can mean things are different to the endemic viruses we are used to.
5. This is hugely
important because we appear to still be at the start of several possible trajectories for SARS2 evolution. This is explained brilliantly here by folks far better qualified than I...

sciencemag.org/news/2021/08/n…
Read 16 tweets
1 Aug
Much has been made of the following SAGE document, which has been reported in the media with a focus on some of the worst case scenarios within it. It has also been dismissed by some scientific commentators...notably not virologists.

Some thoughts...

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
1. Clearly, this is not a press release! It is obviously a response to a broad-ranging brief designed to cover as many scenarios as possible. I'm genuinely surprised it has been released in this format.
2. Some suggest that this report is intended to stoke fear, I disagree.
As above, this has clearly been written to address a specific brief. There's nothing scientifically inaccurate in there whatsoever, each supposition is backed up by plausible rationale. However, whether something might happen, or will happen is usually a combination of humans and
Read 33 tweets
17 Jul
This needs urgent resolution and I am obviously in favour of vaccinating kids. A reminder of why:

1. Kids are not invulnerable to COVID. We saw record paediatric admissions this week. See threads from @jneill and @ProfColinDavis

2. #LongCovidKids

theguardian.com/world/2021/jul…
3. We are already at high levels of infection, this is set to go much higher. Even a small % of a massive number is...a BIG number.

4. Vaccines are MHRA approved for 12+ in the UK. Trials support they are incredibly efficacious and SAFE.

5. Other countries are, successfully.
6. Whether they begin or propagate outbreaks/transmission, schools are a big problem and current bubbles are too big, causing immense disruption, especially since masks were arbitrarily dropped. Ignoring infection is plain stupid, so...let's prevent it!

7. Some have suggested
Read 11 tweets
8 Jul
Strikes me that some may think taking a stand against the mass infection policy and freedom day means that I lack faith in our excellent vaccines and, apparently, am a "lockdown zealot".
I'd like to reassure everyone who knows/follows me or sees this at random that this is untrue
This sort of polarisation of debate is all too common on twitter, and is sadly churned up and propagated by certain cynical characters combined with consecutive failures in pandemic policy. It's in no way black and white, but the main thing is that we ALL want an end to this...
So, in an attempt to collect my thoughts, I've followed advice from @lucy_prodgers and FINALLY written a list...🤪

1. First, we have some AMAZING vaccines, developed by scientists and companies, importantly WITH govt backing, with efficacy and safety proven by trials and real
Read 24 tweets
20 Jan
In the spirit of reconciliation, maybe @MichaelYeadon3 @FatEmperor and @ClareCraigPath have a point, this could all be a conspiracy...
Of course, it involves every UK hospital trust falsifying admissions, bed occupancy, imposing OTT infection control, delaying other provision,
sending a huge swathe of an already massively under-strength workforce home for 10 days on Netflix, oh, and covering up a massive number of murders committed against NHS staff as COVID related, as well as forcing many others to spend endless hours receiving counselling...
Oh, but
we also can't forget the thousands of doctors pairing up to fake the cause of death on official certication to add more fear into the mix. They're also guilty of deliberately preventing families seeing dying loved ones, whilst also taking time to call personally and console their
Read 18 tweets
31 Aug 20
Upsetting to see so many half-truths, dismissive crap and bizarre media conspiracies floating around...sorry, have to get this off my chest.

1. No, of course there aren't as many infections as in spring. We had a lockdown, albeit truncated, and most people still distance...
2. Yes, there are fewer hospital cases and fatalities. This is proportionate to infections, plus more younger people infected. Care homes are better protected (finally) and most shielders did NOT pause, I suspect.

3. Cases are increasing, as is R0, but regional variation and
lower numbers in parts of UK keep it around 1 (or slightly higher in some parts). R0 is only 3 when you don't intervene!

4. No, the virus is not getting "weaker". It is infecting younger, healthier people better able to cope.

5. No, tests are not wildly inaccurate, they don't
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(