Modern Treasury is one of the hottest enterprise software companies out there, having recently raised $38m from Altimeter and Chetan P. at Benchmark. They’re focused on payment ops. But what is that, what do they do, and where are they going?
My longest deep dive yet 👇
1/ One of the reasons I chose to write about Modern Treasury today is b/c the quality of the team and the investors are so high that there is clearly something there.
2/ But the other is that payments, and payment ops in particular, are such a complex space that an explainer is particularly helpful to generalist investors.
3/ So, let’s start w/ the basics: Modern Treasury started w/ a focus on reconciliation.
What is reconciliation? It’s matching up inflows/outflows of cash from bank accounts to transactions that took place in the business.
4/ It’s easy to understand w/ an example from your own life: reviewing your bank statement at the end of each month. You see a bunch of entries — -$5 from Starbucks on 8/22, -$10 from Chipotle on 8/21, etc. and try to match it up to events in your life.
5/ i.e. did you actually get Starbucks on 8/22 and Chipotle on 8/21? And were your purchases of those amounts? You do this for every transaction you see to make sure that every dollar has been accounted for, and no money left your bank account that shouldn’t have.
6/ Well, businesses have to do the same thing. They pay and receive money and have to reconcile the inflows/outflows with their accounting, invoicing, and ERP systems.
7/ The difference is that the scale is way bigger. Imagine if you’re Uber, for example. You’re receiving millions of payments every day from riders, and disbursing those payments to drivers. You’re also dealing w/ millions of refund requests, chargebacks, in-app balances, etc.
8/ Oh, and you’re doing this across dozens of countries in different currencies across likely hundreds of your own bank accounts. Clearly, hand reconciliation of the sort you and I do is not an option.
9/ This is where Modern Treasury started when they launched in 2018. They built software which connects to all your bank accounts via APIs, and reconciles incoming/outgoing payments with actual transactions.
10/ So why did they start here? It makes a lot of sense when you consider that the three co-founders, Dimitri Dadiomov, Sam Aarons, and Matt Marcus, met at LendingHome, which is a loan marketplace.
11/ There, they dealt w/ tons of payments issues - collecting money from investors, disbursing to borrowers, tracking repayments, etc. Some of these transactions would even happen w/ paper checks! If even a penny is unaccounted for, that’s a major problem, because it’s investor $
12/ They built a version of Modern Treasury, called Rainmaker, internally at LendingHome. And when they realized the problem was applicable to a broader set of companies, they founded Modern Treasury.
13/ Since founding, they’ve added a bunch of additional features. “Continuous accounting” syncs up with your ERP/accounting system so that you can close your books near instantly.
They also have API triggers to initiate ACH, wire, and real-time payment transactions from code.
14/ Where will Modern Treasury go from here? Their hypergrowth (23% monthly in 2020) suggests they’re solving real problems.
At the same time, there are some risks. 1st is how bespoke the setup process is for each customer.
15/ There is a lot of work to onboard a new customer. As Modern Treasury says on their website, you need to (1) open a corporate bank account (2) enable direct transmission (essentially get your bank to open up programmatic access to your account) (3) set up all workflows.
16/ You also need to handle all the integrations — with the accounting/ERP system, with the application code, with the invoicing system, etc.
17/ This is all a largely manual process that takes weeks to months. If you can’t largely automate this process, you’re always more of a consulting firm than a software firm. Modern Treasury needs to avoid getting stuck in that trap.
18/ They’re starting to move in this direction w/ their “instant bank partners” program where you can open an account quickly with a Modern Treasury partner bank. This helps speed up the account opening piece — but the rest remains to be seen.
19/ The other question is if their customers will in-source as they scale. This is a fundamental question w/ all infra-type companies: people asked similar questions about Twilio and even AWS at one point.
20/ Ultimately, if cost of a product scales with usage, it begins to make more and more sense for customers to pay the fixed eng. cost to build in-house as they gain scale, unless the product value or switching costs grow equally fast.
21/ I don’t have a strong enough understanding of the buy vs. build dynamics in this space to make a call, but this is a key risk to watch out for… esp. since Modern Treasury charges a % of txn volume in addition to a flat fee per txn (in the “pay as you go” plan listed on site)
22/ Overall, Modern Treasury is clearly solving a real problem and there is product-market fit, at least for certain companies with complex payments needs, like fintechs and marketplaces.
23/ What remains to be seen is how broadly their software is applicable to the largest companies in the world, many of whom have custom-built payment ops software and/or have large payment ops teams doing this work manually (oftentimes offshore).
24/ I'm excited to see Modern Treasury's trajectory over the next 5-10 years.
I, for one, am an optimist - the quality of people, product velocity, and founders' domain expertise lead me to believe they'll work through any challenges!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the past, I’ve written about Tiger Global, Coatue, Dragoneer, Greenoaks: crossover funds that take minority positions in hypergrowth companies.
Today, I want to write about a firm with a different approach. This firm, Invus, is less well known but just as interesting.👇
1/ You probably haven’t heard of Invus, but their track record speaks for itself. They’ve 27x’d investor money in their evergreen fund since ’98 & manage more than $8bn today.
But more interesting is how they did it: they’re a PE firm, but structured diff. from most PE shops.
2/ A little bit of context on PE helps to illustrate how Invus is so different. The major insight of most early PE firms (Blackstone, KKR, etc.) was that by taking companies private, you could aggressively lever them in ways that you couldn’t as a public company shareholder.
The Investment Group of Santa Barbara (IGSB) has one of the best long-term investing track records out there, and was the training ground of Dragoneer founder Marc Stad. But since they don’t manage external $ and are super low-profile, few have heard of them. Let’s change that 👇
1/ IGSB describe themselves as “business builders” - they started out in public equities way back in the late 70s, but increasingly have shifted towards incubating & building businesses themselves with a team of <20 people.
2/ Their most well-known incubated biz is AppFolio, which IGSB had been involved w/ for 7 years and owned 1/3rd of at the time of their 2015 IPO...
Greenoaks is the best investment firm that you’ve never heard of. They've returned 51% annually since 2012 on the back of early bets on Coupang, Deliveroo, etc.
But because they’re ultra-secretive, they’re talked about way less than they should be. I'll try to change that.👇
1/ First, some more details on Greenoaks. They’re tech-focused, based in SF, and manage well over $15bn (exact AUM is not public) with a <15-person investment team.
2/ They focus on privates, and are hands-on w/ portfolio companies. Some current investments include Brex, ScaleAI (which they passed on before co-leading the Series E), Discord, Robinhood, Toast, Airtable, Cockroach Labs, TripActions, etc.
Last week, I did a deep dive into the backstory of Tiger Global. After, I got a lot of requests for a similar deep dive into their $48bn peer Coatue, another super successful Tiger Cub.
So here it is: everything you need to know about Coatue and its founder, Philippe Laffont. 👇
1/ Philippe graduated from MIT in 1991 w/ a degree in Computer Science.
He applied for jobs in 3 different divisions at Apple, and got rejected from all 3. Instead of becoming an engineer, he decided to take a job at McKinsey in Madrid.
2/ FWIW, Philippe has said that he's not sure his technical background has really been that useful as a tech investor.
Many of the best tech investors do not have technical degrees, and most PhDs are not particularly talented investors, so he doesn't think it really correlates.
Everybody has heard of Tiger Global these days. But the firm and its founder, Chase Coleman, are notoriously secretive... so I did some research on the backstory.
Everything you need to know about Chase Coleman and the rise of Tiger Global (warning: long thread)👇
1/ Coleman was born into wealth, and he was childhood friends with Julian Robertson's son on Long Island.
His first job out of college was as an analyst for Robertson at Tiger Management.
2/ He covered tech for Robertson, and made partner within just three years. Most other partners were far older.
Why I think $ANGI could be a $70bn+ company in 10 years (vs. ~$7.5bn today). Long thread below 👇
In short, it's fixed price, fixed price, fixed price.
1/ First, some context.
Angi is the clear leader in home services. Nobody else is even close. And it’s a really hard market to get into - you have to (1) onboard hundreds of thousands of SPs, many of whom are not very tech-savvy and (2) build demand from millions of customers
2/ Reminds me of $SFIX in some ways - massive TAM and they are the clear leader, but it’s super hard to get the details right & experience to be great - which means they've penetrated TAM slower than expected.
At the same time, it's really hard for new entrants to come in.