The short answer is not much has changed. Still (by far) my largest position w the best combo of absolute valuation; execution; and potential event/takeout catalyst.
I think tho some people are realizing the housing/renovation/remodel boom May well continue a good deal longer…
Which is basically the message if you listen to most all the building products/home interior 2Q calls.
Maybe one/some woke up to the fact that this is one of the best quality building products names globally but still absurdly cheap (<5x EV/ebitda, unlevered).
There have also been a number of high profile transactions that basically all occurred at multiples implying we are still mid-cycle for earnings power (Boral NA assets at 13-14x EV/ebitda, etc)
And of course the big one will be the Springs Window (global no2, after HDG) which should print shortly and rumor is well north of 10x EV/ebitda…
Obviously all this implying an HDG stock close or north of 200 EUR, let alone 100…
Which of course only underlines why I think the event angle remains in play….namely Sonnenberg coming back to bid again next April (when the window opens up)…
Because just like all of us they don’t know the future, and sonnenberg prob can’t wait a number of years for the cycle to turn (if it does).
Thus, at 100 or so the calculus is still basically the same. Risk/reward I can’t see anything ‘high beta’ that comes close to the setup…
And frankly I’m bemused when so many other investors are stumping up big cash to buy even minority stakes in inferior housing/building related businesses at 2-3x the multiple here…
Nothing really new but this basically sums up how i am thinking about it now. $HDG.NA
DYODD 🙏🏻👊🏻
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's an interesting example for the commodity shitco degenerates in my feed: Stanmore Resources, $SMR.AX.
Note this is extremely illiquid, as a result I have a tiny position, I think its more of a speculation than an 'all in' type call. But it is certainly intriguing...
As always here at Raper Capital there is an event angle. $SMR.AX is 74% owned by a Singapore holdco, Golden Energy $AUE.SI, also v cheap but a different beast.
Note that Golden bid for the whole co at $1 last April...
Stock was in the low 80s at the time - despite coal prices being in the toilet (post COVID) and a few operational issues.
Unclear why they couldn't mop up the entire thing, I guess there were a few holdouts, they went from 31% to 75% but couldn't get it done.
We will come to the next chapter soon enough but here's a recap to catch you up. 2014-19 was an exploratory period where I developed my investment style; tried to launch a fund, 2x, and didn't get it going; and had overall success punctuated by extreme volatility at times...
I grossed 220% over six yrs (vs SPX ~100%), whilst running ~30% average net exposure (ie beta-adjusted neutral), but punctuated by bouts of extreme volatility and underperformance.
Indeed most all the outperformance was generated in the early years when credit analysis 'worked'
To recap:
2014: +119% vs SPX +12%
2015: +39% vs SPX -1%
2016: +1% vs SPX +10%
2017: +21% vs SPX +19%
2018: -25% vs SPX -6%
2019: +15% vs SPX +29%
Cumulative performance: +220% (21.5% CAGR) vs SPX +100% (12.2% CAGR)
Time for another chapter in the Raper Capital origin story. Part 6: 2019.
This was a most eventful year and the most difficult since I began my full-time money management adventure. I got carried out of numerous shorts at huge losses and my entire approach was questioned...
First, the headline numbers. +15% on the yr vs the SPX +29%. In general I'll always take an absolute performance like that, but this felt like a total loss if you look at how I was doing through 1-3Q:
As you can see, I was on track for a smashing year (mid-30s%+) before 4Q happened and brought everything crashing down...
Looking at the top detractors ($NIO short calls, short $TSLA, etc) its pretty clear what happened...
If I had to summarize the state of play in a GIF it would be
Honestly the FY numbers were OK to fine. Overall EBITDA (pre-leases) was flat YoY despite large COVID issues (lockdowns affecting work; labor shortages, etc). Adjusting from leases, 'true' EBITDA was $16mm (and worth noting the trajectory much stronger in 2H):
Let's break it down by segments. Core homebuilding saw a big increase in starts - +14% yoy - a bit higher than I expected, but lower earnings as margins got hit by shortages and inefficiencies. Actually I think the Balance sheet tells part of the tale too...
Recall in 2018 I was still working at a fund in 🇬🇧 so was running long only and VERY concentrated (just a handful of core names). Still, 2018 was pretty painful, -25% vs the SPX -6%, most all the pain due to the huge Q4 drawdown in $AER:
Actually worth looking at the quarterly progression of returns. If you remember 2018 you'll recall 4Q was an absolute bloodbath (the 'taper tantrum') with many stocks falling out of bed for no apparent reason. $AER was no exception.
Some of these cyclical valuations are getting downright absurd. Today's example: Kloeckner $KCO.DE
This is not a particularly great biz (mild understatement) but let the numbers speak for themselves. 1.6bn EV (pre-2Q nos), currently doing 200-250mm EBITDA per QUARTER 🤪🤪
EV post-2Q will be ~1.5bn (they'll generate a bunch of cash), and prob 1.3-1.4bn post 3Q. Post 3Q - almost in the bank - they'll basically be <1x net levered (vs 4-5x a yr ago).
Like many other biz in this space, one good yr has completely fixed the B/S...
Again what's interesting here is what the mkt seems to imply will happen. This biz is run-rating 800mm+ EBITDA - so is on <2x EV/EBITDA currently - and there's no sign the environment is rolling over...
But who cares if it does? The biz did 200mm EBITDA pre-COVID in a good year