Time for another chapter in the Raper Capital origin story. Part 6: 2019.

This was a most eventful year and the most difficult since I began my full-time money management adventure. I got carried out of numerous shorts at huge losses and my entire approach was questioned...

👇
First, the headline numbers. +15% on the yr vs the SPX +29%. In general I'll always take an absolute performance like that, but this felt like a total loss if you look at how I was doing through 1-3Q:
As you can see, I was on track for a smashing year (mid-30s%+) before 4Q happened and brought everything crashing down...

Looking at the top detractors ($NIO short calls, short $TSLA, etc) its pretty clear what happened...
Let's talk about the winners first. $AER bounced back from the 2018 obliteration, largely with the market. No rocket science there.

But $GAN was a huge winner, largely off the back of a tried and tested playbook: business inflection + better capital market (US relisting)...
...leading to significant rerating. You can read my original $GAN musings here:

rapercapital.com/2020/01/03/gan…

its funny to look back on it now and see how much the story has changed from what I thought it was; and also how much more the market is willing to pay for this biz...
...and is a continual reminder to me of how little we really know, both about the biz and the mkt's perception of it.

Also it doesn't show up on the top winners, but through 1-3Q I had variouse HUGE paper gains on my core shorts in $TSLA and $NIO.

These all reversed massively..
Let's talk a bit about what went wrong. First $TSLA as its easier.

$TSLA was always for me a credit-based short as I thought they had a balance sheet issue; a capital markets access issue; and, ultimately, a liquidity issue, in early 2019.
This was the principal reason why the stock was so weak in 1H 2019. But what was interesting - and fooled me - was the stock KEPT falling after doing an equity deal in April (?) that removed 1) trigger risk and 2) access to capital risk. The fact stock kept falling meant...
...I, and a lot of other credit shorts, thought we were right. But we were not. They had removed solvency risk and generally in balance sheet situations, if the 'trigger' is gone, whether you think its a fraud or not, you have to cover and move on.

It took me until the 3Q print.
Still, I'm obvi glad I covered when I did 🥴🥴

$NIO was something else entirely. I made a number of positioning/structuring mistakes, but the main problem was I nailed the fundamentals. See here for my original writeup:

valueinvestorsclub.com/idea/NIO_INC_-…
When you nail the fundamentals on a levered shitco fraud and it goes 80% in your favor, it is EXTREMELY DIFFICULT to check out of the story on time.

When $NIO lost its CFO, and resorted to selective disclosure to get by, I thought it was a bagel and piled on.
We all know how that ended. 🤮🤮

Most of the pain came through, again, sizing mistakes, and using derivatives (even 'pros' make huge errors).

Basically though the main learning/takeaway was to question entirely my shorting philosophy...
...because if a co like $NIO wasn't a zero given all the facts on the ground, and if capital would be endlessly extended, what good was/is credit analysis?

After this i really reined in my shorts and essentially stopped shorting in the US market...
...which caused me a ton of pain in early 2020, but saved me from trying to take the other side of obvious frauds/fads like $KODK, $GME, $AMC, etc, and thus, added to my performance the next two years.
In other words $NIO was a massively painful lesson and extracted probably 15pts of PnL from me in 2019, but nevertheless I learnt something from it that I continue to use, today.

As a wider point - I had now underperformed the mkt 3 out of the last 4 yrs...
...and had failed at raising $$ for a second time. So was feeling somewhat dejected on the work front heading into 2020. Nevertheless I took some comfort from being able to turn a decent year even in the face of massive blow ups in a very short time period.
Still, if I thought 2019 was challenging, 2020 was about to throw something else at me....

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeremy Raper

Jeremy Raper Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @puppyeh1

14 Sep
Here's an interesting example for the commodity shitco degenerates in my feed: Stanmore Resources, $SMR.AX.

Note this is extremely illiquid, as a result I have a tiny position, I think its more of a speculation than an 'all in' type call. But it is certainly intriguing...

👇👇
As always here at Raper Capital there is an event angle. $SMR.AX is 74% owned by a Singapore holdco, Golden Energy $AUE.SI, also v cheap but a different beast.

Note that Golden bid for the whole co at $1 last April...
Stock was in the low 80s at the time - despite coal prices being in the toilet (post COVID) and a few operational issues.

Unclear why they couldn't mop up the entire thing, I guess there were a few holdouts, they went from 31% to 75% but couldn't get it done.
Read 19 tweets
13 Sep
We will come to the next chapter soon enough but here's a recap to catch you up. 2014-19 was an exploratory period where I developed my investment style; tried to launch a fund, 2x, and didn't get it going; and had overall success punctuated by extreme volatility at times...
I grossed 220% over six yrs (vs SPX ~100%), whilst running ~30% average net exposure (ie beta-adjusted neutral), but punctuated by bouts of extreme volatility and underperformance.

Indeed most all the outperformance was generated in the early years when credit analysis 'worked'
To recap:

2014: +119% vs SPX +12%
2015: +39% vs SPX -1%
2016: +1% vs SPX +10%
2017: +21% vs SPX +19%
2018: -25% vs SPX -6%
2019: +15% vs SPX +29%

Cumulative performance: +220% (21.5% CAGR) vs SPX +100% (12.2% CAGR) Image
Read 10 tweets
3 Sep
Let's check in on one of my fave little Aussie shitcos, Simonds Group $SIO.AX. You can read the original thread here:



If I had to summarize the state of play in a GIF it would be
Honestly the FY numbers were OK to fine. Overall EBITDA (pre-leases) was flat YoY despite large COVID issues (lockdowns affecting work; labor shortages, etc). Adjusting from leases, 'true' EBITDA was $16mm (and worth noting the trajectory much stronger in 2H):
Let's break it down by segments. Core homebuilding saw a big increase in starts - +14% yoy - a bit higher than I expected, but lower earnings as margins got hit by shortages and inefficiencies. Actually I think the Balance sheet tells part of the tale too...
Read 11 tweets
1 Sep
Since $HDG.NA is breaking out to new highs and I’m getting a fair few inbounds, let me open the kimono a little as to my thinking here…
The short answer is not much has changed. Still (by far) my largest position w the best combo of absolute valuation; execution; and potential event/takeout catalyst.

I think tho some people are realizing the housing/renovation/remodel boom May well continue a good deal longer…
Which is basically the message if you listen to most all the building products/home interior 2Q calls.

Maybe one/some woke up to the fact that this is one of the best quality building products names globally but still absurdly cheap (<5x EV/ebitda, unlevered).
Read 8 tweets
23 Aug
The first rule of media is 'give the people what they want' and in Fintwit that means either gains porn; loss porn; or uninformed COVID commentary 😂

Today's chapter in the Raper Capital origin story: 2018. Loss porn 🥴🥴

Previous chapters available here👇👇
Recall in 2018 I was still working at a fund in 🇬🇧 so was running long only and VERY concentrated (just a handful of core names). Still, 2018 was pretty painful, -25% vs the SPX -6%, most all the pain due to the huge Q4 drawdown in $AER:
Actually worth looking at the quarterly progression of returns. If you remember 2018 you'll recall 4Q was an absolute bloodbath (the 'taper tantrum') with many stocks falling out of bed for no apparent reason. $AER was no exception.

I was actually doing fine, Q1-Q3...
Read 9 tweets
6 Aug
Some of these cyclical valuations are getting downright absurd. Today's example: Kloeckner $KCO.DE

This is not a particularly great biz (mild understatement) but let the numbers speak for themselves. 1.6bn EV (pre-2Q nos), currently doing 200-250mm EBITDA per QUARTER 🤪🤪
EV post-2Q will be ~1.5bn (they'll generate a bunch of cash), and prob 1.3-1.4bn post 3Q. Post 3Q - almost in the bank - they'll basically be <1x net levered (vs 4-5x a yr ago).

Like many other biz in this space, one good yr has completely fixed the B/S...
Again what's interesting here is what the mkt seems to imply will happen. This biz is run-rating 800mm+ EBITDA - so is on <2x EV/EBITDA currently - and there's no sign the environment is rolling over...

But who cares if it does? The biz did 200mm EBITDA pre-COVID in a good year
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(