1/ One, beyond being “concerned”, MEPs call for concrete & practical cooperation to support TW in the context of the EU’s Indo-Pacific strategy & urge to include TW into existing platforms & working groups to help bypass China’s attempts to further isolate TW. @bueti
3/ Three, MEPs propose to change name of ‘European Economic & Trade Office in TW’ to ‘EU Office in Taiwan’. My take: MEPs’ convergence & language on TW provides solid ground for member states to build on, but they must want to do so for any of this to lead to meaningful progress.
4/ Steps for EU & member states to follow: recognise that peace & stability in Indo-Pacific are core interest for EU & that Taiwan is therefore of strategic importance to the EU;see TW as a key partner & understand the need to protect TW’s democracy & to work w/democratic allies;
5/ see TW on its own merit; acknowledge its central role in strategic industries & urge more cooperation & investment in areas where TW leads; encourage more econ, scientific, cult, pol and people-to-people, city to city exchange;
6/learn from TW’s experience of fighting against #disinformation - bottom-up, transparent & citizen-led; see such threat as part of a larger problem facing all democracies across the globe;
7/ recognise the importance of strengthening #China & #Taiwan expertise in Europe; help raise awareness in Europe about TW .
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@europarl is in the process of tabling its 1st ever stand-alone report on #Taiwan.
🧵 to unpack its importance: Report is solid indication EP is pushing Brussels to consider upgrading EU-Taiwan ties. But what ‘upgrade’ entails hangs on level of convergence between member states
The push is backed by a majority of MEPs, led by @bueti@gahler_michael@rglucks1 & more, with shared interest to ensure shift in Brussels on #China is real. This shift has already facilitated reconsidering ties w/Taiwan as a partner, not a ‘sensitive issue’
For now, having a report is more important than its actual content. BUT, report must be a core element of a strategic debate on Taiwan within Europe, which 1. sees TW on its own merit, not only through the lens of China;
On 20 Jan @Europarl_EN adopted its annual report on implementation of #CFSP outlining ways fwd for EU in the world, rapporteur @davidmcallister. #Taiwan plays a much more important role in MEPs’ demands on #China, BUT also includes consideration of TW on its own merits 🧵 1/
most importantly MEPs call for #EU *and* member states “to revisit their engagement policy with #Taiwan” - 1st time such language makes it into an EP report. MEPs go beyond the usual language advocating for TW’s “meaningful participation in int’l org” 2/
all this is a strong indication of: 1. increasing interest & willingness to pay more attention to #Taiwan in EP; 2. what to expect of the EP re ratification of #CAI; as @bueti said “there is no deal until EP says it is a deal”. 3/
For EU scholars advocating for stronger #EU-#Taiwan ties, it’s key to grasp what our European trade offices (15: 🇦🇹 🇧🇪🇨🇿🇩🇰🇫🇮🇫🇷🇩🇪🇭🇺🇮🇹🇱🇺🇳🇱🇵🇱🇸🇰🇪🇸🇸🇪) do on the ground, and how much the EU 🇪🇺 & its member states can & want to do with/in TW. Long🧵 follows:
Met with Frederic Verheyden, #Belgium’s representative this morning. A compelling talk, in many regards, not least bc of our Bruxellois connection & good company @maxime_ramon Sharing a few reflections, starting w/trade & investment, essence of all EU offices’ presence in TW 1/9
#EU is the nr 1 investor in #Taiwan, but few people in TW actually know. Challenges will remain for the EU to leverage its raw economic power in a political context, as well as to leverage a joint image, given its fragmentation 2/9