1/ Important observation: many respiratory viruses are much easier to culture at 33°C than 37°C – as predicted by temperature dependent viral tropism #TDVT
However, virologists normally put this down to the thermal sensitivity of the host CELLS – less interferon may be produced by cells at 33°C than 37°C doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1…
3/ Actually our immune defences do seem to be weaker when we breath cold air –this may explain the observation that standing still outdoors is correlated with increased mortality from respiratory disease (while outdoor exertion sufficient to cause sweating seems to be protective)
4/ But can our greater susceptibility when breathing cold air explain, on its own, the strange universal winter seasonality of respiratory viruses?
At least 4 lines of evidence say it can’t. In reality we also need to invoke the thermal sensitivity of virus itself. Here's why:
1. Viral resp infections are common year-round in the Tropics, but rare in temperate locations during summer. This weighs against the idea that breathing warm air significantly increases immunity. (Suggests instead that thermal sensitivity in resp-virs adapts to climate & season)
2. There are often sudden peaks in respiratory illness in early autumn (circles) – when air temperature has only dropped by a few degrees and is still above average. If immunity can be weakened by such a small temperature drop, why don’t we get far greater sickness in mid-winter?
3. Similarly, the very rapid short-term response of respiratory illness to temperature dips, and the simultaneous epidemics throughout large regions, suggest a HARVESTING mechanism in winter. Here are colds and flu in the Netherlands in winter 1925/26
4. Several influential studies from the 1950s and 60s using recycled “pedigree” strains suggest that our immunity is not greatly reduced by chilling/cold air. (Rather, it seems that the recycled viral strains used were unlike “wild” viruses.)
9/ Both mechanisms are supported by wet-lab studies and by the observation that outdoor exertion sufficient to cause sweating is (or seems to be) protective
(An anorak is a parka BTW, and a long-sleeved vest is an undershirt!)
10/ So . . . experiments are needed!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Fig 1 of Kanduc & Shoenfeld (2020) uses a very simple analysis: shows that CoV-2 shares many 6-chain amino acid sequences with human and mouse genomes, but not other genomes such as cow, pig, gorilla, chimp, rhesus monkey, fruit bat
2/ The same applies to polio, measles, dengue, influenza H1N1, smallpox, HPV, and Ebola viruses. Also bacterial pathogens like anthrax, plague and toxoplasmosis; all overlap more with mouse (and rat) than other animals.
3/ This implies we have frequently swapped pathogens with rodents - which we live very closely with. (Apparently bat experts say bats have the most dangerous viruses. But rodent experts say THEY, rodents, harbour the worst viruses!)
The problem is that we essentially have ONE observation - that hundreds of often unrelated viruses in all regions (outside the Tropics) with very diverse climates, have winter seasonality
2/
If we say the winter surge of colds in one place is due to eg school buses, business travel and humidity, but somewhere else it's sports events, snow and sunshine, we are cheating. We’re “overfitting” - we are using too many variables to model a 1-d phenomenon
3/
One reason I’m convinced that viruses moderate their pathogenicity much more than is often appreciated comes from observations of hemorrhagic fevers, which give fascinating insights
/1
People occasionally pick up viruses from animals especially rodents & bats. Usually they cause mild flu-like symptoms but here's the extraordinary thing: if they get a hold they often cause internal & external bleeding & are fatal – in spite of NOT being well-adapted to humans
/2
Ebola is one example. There are many others eg Rift Valley, Lujo, Bolivian and Brazilian hem. fevers. Ebola, Marburg, Crimean-Congo and Lassa hem. fevers can spread from person to person.
/3
IMO you can’t understand CoV-2 or any other virus without understanding the "virulence-transmission trade-off hypothesis"
This hypothesis was introduced in the 1950s to explain observations of myxomatosis. Basically, very mild strains became moderate, while very virulent ones also became moderate
The hypothesis says a virus must balance the amount of shedding against the time during which the shedding takes place – the time will be reduced if viral virulence is too great
1/ The Nobel laureate André Lwoff suggested part of the hypothesis in 1959, when he noted that the degree of virulence of viruses is often related to their level of thermal sensitivity
2/ In 1979, Richman and Murphy developed this further, discussing many examples of thermal sensitivity in natural and lab‐made viral strains, and noting that the near‐universal attenuation of ts strains made them good candidates for vaccines. doi.org/10.1093/clinid…
3/ The full hypothesis was proposed by Shaw Stewart and discussed at length in 2016, focusing on seasonality and the natural selection of strains with varying degrees of thermal sensitivity and pathogenicity
The UK 10-day self-isolation period is highly disruptive to industry.
But it may also be counter-productive in combating Covid-19.
2/ 5
We know that Covid-19 incubation periods vary hugely, with some illnesses appearing 2 or 3 days after exposure, but others taking 14 days or more.
Some of this variation is likely to be related to the properties of the particular “isolate” (ie strain) involved.
3/ 5
It is also likely that strains with short incubation periods are more pathogenic. This is the basis of the “virulence-transmission trade-off hypothesis” and has been proposed for several viruses including influenza and myxomatosis.